South Korea: Post-M&A Disputes In Korea

Last Updated: 12 November 2006

By Kap-You (Kevin) Kim* and John P. Bang**

Korea has seen a dramatic increase in international commercial disputes in recent years. Among these, post-M&A deal disputes have become increasingly common and acrimonious. As the authors detail below, a historically unique set of circumstances set the stage for this swift rise in international disputes in Korea. The authors, leading the International Arbitration and Litigation team at Bae, Kim & Lee, one of Korea’s preeminent law firms, have had the opportunity to see and be involved in the process firsthand, and share their perspectives below.

I. M&A Boom Of The Asian Financial Crisis

The recent spike in international disputes in Korea has roots that go back to the latter half of 1997, when the Asian Financial Crisis, constituting the greatest economic crisis in Korea’s history, hit the nation. The Korean government had run out of its foreign currency reserves and had no choice but to seek a substantial bail-out by the IMF. In an attempt to achieve the BIS capital ratio requirements imposed by the Korean government and the IMF, commercial financial institutions in Korea undertook self-rescue measures by demanding the prompt repayment of corporate loans and even ceasing to grant new corporate loans to those corporations with poor credit standing. These strict lending and repayment policies imposed heavy financial costs and liquidity demands on Korean companies, pushing many to the verge of insolvency.

These desperate times demanded desperate measures at every level of Korean business. The conditions forced even the Chaebols – Korean conglomerates – to restructure their businesses to reduce debt by various means such as selling non-core businesses, inducing foreign capital and downsizing subsidiaries. In the vortex of this corporate business restructuring process, scores of foreign companies entered into M&A transactions with Korean companies, often purchasing outright, or securing a majority interest in, various Korean enterprises. As a result, foreign investment levels more than doubled between 1997 and 2000, rising from US$7 billion to US$15.7 billion.

II. Resultant Wave Of M&A Disputes

Through this flashflood of restructuring and M&A deals, by the end of 2000, Korea was able to meet most of the structural performance criteria in the timeframe specified in the three-year IMF-supported program, thus averting an economic collapse. Since then, the Korean economy has made a solid recovery. But regardless of the overall economic success, a significant number of the M&A transactions that occurred during the crisis period have, in recent years, given rise to a variety of disputes between the corporate parties. We explain below several common problems that have led to such disputes, and offer some examples from our experience.

1. Conflict between boilerplate provisions and negotiated terms

One common feature of the current genus of M&A deal disputes is inconsistency between contractual terms. Perhaps due to the high-pressured nature of the economic environment existing when such deals were negotiated and drafted, occasionally some discrepancy between provisions found in standard boilerplate provisions in the contract and those specifically negotiated for the deal has given rise to conflicting expectations. This discrepancy often forms the basis for a legal dispute.

By way of example, the authors recently represented the creditors of a former Korean passenger vehicle manufacturer and distributor in an ICC arbitration, seeking the return of escrow account funds against, among others, a large foreign automobile manufacturer and distributor. The dispute in this arbitration started when, due to natural land subsidence, cracks developed in the walls and floors of the automobile manufacturing plant acquired by the purchaser, necessitating millions of dollars in repairs. As a result, the purchaser refused to disgorge the multi-million dollar (USD) escrow fund held in reserve pending satisfaction of representations and warranties in the contract. The boilerplate language in the asset purchase contract included a representation by the seller that the purchased assets were to be in good operating condition and repair, subject to normal wear and tear consistent with the age and use of assets. Although the subsidence would seem facially to be in violation of such a general representation, as we successfully argued to the tribunal, the land subsidence had been factored into the negotiations, drawing down the plant’s value and ultimate sale price. Nonetheless, had the parties made an express provision acknowledging the subsidence and exempting it from the general "good working condition" representation, the dispute would likely never have arisen. Numerous examples could be cited demonstrating a comparable complication.

2. Disclosure problems

Another common source of conflict is the tension between the obligation of a seller to disclose material problems and the due diligence obligation of the buyer to make itself aware of discernible problems through a reasonable inspection. Frequently, parties will prepare a schedule of known problems or liabilities and declare in their general representations and warranties that the seller will be responsible for all liabilities except as set out in that schedule. Problems arise when a liability that was apparent to any reasonable due diligence inspection is not included on the schedule of exempt liabilities. For instance, the same arbitration concerning the Korean automobile maker mentioned above involved a claim for a multi-million dollar (USD) key money (lease) deposit to a lessor which went bankrupt over two years before the asset purchase. The car maker was not able to recover its money and had to simply accept it as a financial loss. The loss was apparent in the financial documents provided by the seller for the buyer’s due diligence review, but not expressly reflected in the schedule of excluded liabilities. Our argument, once again accepted by the tribunal, was that if the buyer had failed to note the liability, which was by no means concealed, then it had been reckless in its due diligence review.

III. Arbitration as the chosen method for dispute resolution

In a large percentage of cases, the parties to such M&A transactions concluded between a Korean enterprise and a foreign counterpart during the financial crisis of the late 1990s opted for international arbitration as the method of dispute resolution. The likely reasons for this are several. First of all, dispute resolution is typically one of the final points discussed in negotiations, after the parties have settled on the material terms concerning the substance of the contract. It seems an afterthought to parties who, in forging a deal, do not have in the forefront of their minds the possibility of disputes. Moreover, the parties would rather not have such an "afterthought" arise as a sticking point that threatens to derail the substance of a deal that has already been agreed to in essence. Thus, they tend to be reasonably acquiescent on this point, as parties are often willing to accept what is perceived as a neutral venue – international arbitration under an established set of rules like the ICC – rather than demand litigation in the courts of their home country.

There is no question that arbitration can offer distinct advantages and a level of party-control that court-based litigation does not. The parties often fail to realize, however, that if not properly drafted, an arbitration provision – along with related clauses establishing governing law, locus, arbitration system and even language – can often not only be the source of unnecessary costs, but can often be determinative of the outcome of a dispute. For instance, the site of arbitration has implications aside from just travel expenses for one or both parties. Generally, even if the parties have selected a set of arbitration rules for disputes, many countries have their own statutes which apply to certain procedural matters, particularly if the parties have not decided such matters. For instance, the Korea Arbitration Act, which applies to any arbitration brought in Korea, calls for the law of the State most closely connected with the subject-matter of the dispute to be applied in the absence of party agreement on that point. Occasionally, parties will fail to designate governing law in the contract, and this oversight can be outcome-determinative, since the applicable law can make or break a party’s case. The Arbitration Act also places strict limits on discovery and establishes the role of courts in matters such as enforcement. Such matters are obviously vital to successful prosecution of a case and should be researched thoroughly by the parties’ counsel so they understand the exact ramifications of their arbitration provision.

Clearly, an arbitration clause must be drafted carefully, even specifying such details as the language in which the arbitration is to be conducted or the number and method of choosing arbitrators. If not, costs can very easily skyrocket in the resolution of such procedural uncertainties.

IV. Succeeding In The Korean Arbitration Trend

As summarized above, the number of international arbitration and litigation cases has risen sharply in Korea in connection with the M&A deals executed during the Asian Financial Crisis. This has been a remarkable trend witnessed in Korea in the field of cross-border disputes, and such post-completion M&A disputes calling for arbitration as the dispute resolution method are expected to continue in the foreseeable future. Knowing some of the common issues giving rise to such problems is helpful not only to the arbitration practitioner, but also to contract drafters who seek to avoid pitfalls. The authors hope the information shared here can be of assistance, and invite further inquiries from readers.

* Partner and head of the International Arbitration & Litigation Practice Group, Bae, Kim & Lee, Seoul, Korea. Mr. Kim is also an Adjunct Professor of Law, College of Law, Seoul National University and College of Law, Sogang University.

** Senior Foreign Legal Consultant of the International Arbitration & Litigation Practice Group, Bae, Kim & Lee, Seoul, Korea

THE AUTHORS have been at the front lines of the international arbitration trend in Korea. Their firm, Bae Kim & Lee, was in the vanguard of law firms through the Asian Financial Crisis and even today is unique among major Korean law firms in having a dedicated International Arbitration and Litigation Practice Group, consisting of 8 dedicated, full-time lawyers and support staff. Heading that practice, the authors have represented numerous major corporate clients, both domestic and foreign, in arbitration proceedings in number of different locations around the globe and under the rules of all major international arbitral institutions including, among others, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB), the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association (JCAA) and the Singapore International Arbitration Commission (SIAC). Over their years of experience, they and their team have represented clients, domestic and foreign, in a broad range of industries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions