United Arab Emirates: DIFC Courts Sign A Memorandum Of Guidance For The Reciprocal Enforcement Of Money Judgments And A Memorandum Relating To References Of Questions Of Law With Singapore

The UAE and Singapore have, in recent years, enjoyed a strong relationship. Bilateral trade between Singapore and the UAE has jumped from S$4.4 billion in 2001, reaching S$11.6 billion in 2009 and is expected to have increased further since. More than 300 Singaporean companies are currently said to be working in the UAE, operating in the fields of infrastructure, real estate, communications, transportation, water treatment and IT ‒ to name a few. Similarly, investment by UAE companies in Singapore has also grown significantly in recent years in areas such as oil and gas storage, refinery, and exploration. In the area of law, the UAE, particularly the DIFC, has looked to Singapore as inspiration in bringing about a climate of trust and confidence in the judiciary. As an example of this, the DIFC Courts in 2005 appointed eminent Singaporean lawyer and arbitrator Mr Michael Hwang SC as its Deputy Chief Justice, who was in 2010 elevated to the position of Chief Justice.

Further evidence of Dubai's commitment to developing and strengthening its ties with Singapore can be found in the memorandum of guidance ("MOG") entered into by the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts ("DIFC Courts") and the Supreme Court of Singapore, on 19 January 2015. The Supreme Court of Singapore is made up of the High Court and the Appeals Court and, as of January 2015, the Singapore International Commercial Court (the "SICC").

There is currently no formal treaty between the UAE and Singapore for the reciprocal enforcement of court judgments; nor is the UAE a member of the Commonwealth of Nations whose judgments would have been enforceable in Singapore under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act, and vice versa. The MOG now provides detailed guidance as to both the criteria and procedure for the recognition and enforcement of money judgments of the Singapore Courts in the DIFC Courts, and vice versa. In short, it is a guide for each Court, setting out how cross-border enforcement is to be conducted in the future. But the MOG is not binding on the DIFC Courts or the Supreme Court of Singapore.

In signing up to the MOG, the DIFC Courts and Supreme Court of Singapore have undertaken to apply a common law approach to the reciprocal enforcement of foreign judgments. This approach requires that:

(a) the court which rendered the judgment must have had jurisdiction to determine the dispute;

(b) the parties to the original court proceedings and the enforcement proceedings must be the same (or derive their title from the original parties);

(c) the judgment must be final and conclusive (even though it may be subject to appeal); and

(d) the judgment must be a money judgment (judgments ordering fines, taxes or penalties are not).

When these criteria are satisfied, neither Court will re-examine the merits of any judgment which is sought to be registered and enforced in the other jurisdiction. We note that there remain a very limited number of grounds for challenging recognition (for example, suspicion of fraud, issues of public policy and the judgment being contrary to the principles of natural justice). It should also be noted that the terms recorded in the MOG between the DIFC Courts and Singapore do not apply to the enforcement of money judgments in the local UAE courts.

The signing of this MOG is noteworthy as this is the first such memorandum entered into by the DIFC Courts and a South East Asian state. The DIFC Courts have also entered into MOGs with the Commercial Courts of England and Wales, the New South Wales Supreme Court, the Federal Court of Australia and most recently the Kenyan High Court. These MOGs demonstrate Dubai's commitment to providing another layer of certainty for investors in these jurisdictions doing business in Dubai as they provide significant reassurance and guidance about the procedures for enforcing money judgments in the respective jurisdictions.

The signing of this MOG is particularly relevant for Singapore in light of the launch of the SICC, which was introduced as a new platform for the resolution of the international commercial disputes in the Asia Pacific region. One of the main concerns in relation to the SICC's effectiveness has been the enforceability of its judgments internationally. This was the subject of our previous e-bulletin which may be accessed here.

Notwithstanding the MOG's non-binding status, it is a significant step  taken by the Supreme Court of Singapore in an attempt to improve  the  enforceability  of  its  judgments  in  other  jurisdictions. It  will  be  interesting  to  see whether  other  reciprocal enforcement agreements between Courts emerge in the coming years if it proves to be an effective, and certainly more expedient, means of increasing enforcement prospects. Certainly the UAE has been a leader in adopting this approach, in contrast to the traditional outreach to other states, with a view to negotiating and entering into bilateral treaties.

Signing of the Memorandum of Understanding on References of Questions of Law (the "MOU")

The DIFC Courts and Supreme Court of Singapore have additionally entered into a document setting out a procedure for dealing with issues of foreign law. Under that procedure, instead of having to engage expert witnesses to opine on foreign law in the usual adversarial manner, the MOU allows the Courts to direct the parties to take steps to have any contested issue of foreign law determined by the other Court.

The Supreme Court of Singapore has previously entered into a similar agreement with the Supreme Court of New South Wales ("Singapore-NSW MOU"). This is in line with the procedure adopted by certain common law courts in referring questions of foreign law into each other's courts – for example, as per the Westacre Investments v Yugoimport case. In that case, a question arose in relation to an English law point and the Supreme Court of Singapore proceeded to direct the judgment creditor to apply to an English court for an authoritative statement of the relevant English law.

Inspired by this, the New South Wales Supreme Court Act was amended to empower its Supreme Court to order, subject to certain conditions, that proceedings be commenced in a foreign court to answer questions as to the principles of foreign law. In addition to Singapore, the New South Wales Supreme Court has also entered into a similar memorandum of understanding with the state of New York.

Under the MOU, the requested Court would undertake to answer the question of law as expeditiously as its procedures would allow. By way of a parallel, the current Singapore Rules of Court, (Order 101), allow the Singapore High Court or the Court of Appeal to order that a question of NSW law be referred to the NSW Court. It is likely that Order 101 will now be extended to include referrals arising from the MOU.

Whilst we view the issuing of the MOU as a positive and potentially cost-effective method dealing with issues of foreign law, it remains to be seen how such references will be dealt with in practice. Would such responses bind the requesting Court? Can they be appealed? In particular, the MOU provides (in addition to the formal application route) for "less formal forms of communication and consultation" between the Courts regarding questions of law. It is not clear what this entails, and how would the result of such forms of communication be deployed in practice.

Furthermore, it remains to be seen whether parties to the dispute will have much influence over the decision to refer queries to the other Court. The idea of a referral to a different Court, if made without party explicit consent, is certainly a novel one. Moreover, how the process of referrals sits with the concept of exclusive jurisdiction (as would be stipulated in the parties' underlying contracts) is one that the Courts may also need to consider.

What does all this mean for business? For businesses investing in South East Asia, the MOG and the MOU mean that the DIFC Courts are now a serious option for the resolution and eventual enforcement of disputes. From the Singapore perspective, with the introduction of the SICC, boasting a variety of international judges hoping to bring international expertise to the domestic court system of Singapore, it will be interesting to see what place the referral system under the MOU will have.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions