Hong Kong's Administrative Appeal Board Affirms Privacy Commissioner's Decision On Clandestine Photo-Taking Of Artists By Media Organizations

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
The Administrative Appeal Board affirmed the decision to issue enforcement notices to two magazines in relation to their clandestine photo-taking of artists at their private residence.
Hong Kong Privacy

On January 6, 2014, the Administrative Appeal Board affirmed the decision by the Privacy Commissioner in Hong Kong to issue enforcement notices to two magazines in relation to their clandestine photo-taking of artists at their private residence because the clandestine photo-taking amounted to "unfair means" by which personal data of the artists were collected and therefore contravened Data Protection Principle 1(2) under the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. The Principle provides that "[p]ersonal data shall be collected by means which are (a) lawful; and (b) fair in the circumstances of the case."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More