ARTICLE
28 February 2014

Landlords Succeed In Landmark Case

DS
DMH Stallard

Contributor

DMH Stallard is an award winning South East law firm with offices in London, Brighton, Gatwick, Guilford, Hassocks and Horsham. DMH Stallard has grown rapidly since it was established in 1970, and continues to maintain its focus on building long term relationships with clients to help deliver their goals and objectives.

Further to my article last week, we have today learned that the Court of Appeal has found in favour of landlords in the much anticipated case of "Jervis & Others v Pillar Denton and Others".
United Kingdom Real Estate and Construction

Further to my article last week, we have today learned that the Court of Appeal has found in favour of landlords in the much anticipated case of Jervis & Others v Pillar Denton and Others (the Game administration).

To recap: Game entered administration one day after its quarter rent date fell due in March 2012 and its administrators relied on previous case law (Goldacre and Luminar) that they were not liable to pay sums that fell due (rent and service charges) prior to their appointment, as an administration expense. The landlords would have to prove for those sums in the usual way as unsecured creditors.

The landlords challenged this and today succeeded. Accordingly, we will now be dealing with a 'pay as you go' scenario in which, if the administrators are using the leasehold premises for the purposes of the administration, rent and service charges will be payable as an administration expense for the period in which they are in occupation.

This is a landmark decision which will have huge ramifications for both administrators and landlords. Landlords will naturally be pleased to see their position ameliorated in the current insolvency regime. At first glance, it is a blow to administrators and other classes of creditors as there will be less sums to distribute after having satisfied landlords. However, at least administrators will have certainty of their rental liabilities, if they occupy the premises for the purpose of the administration. This may not be the end of the matter, however, as an appeal to the Supreme Court is being considered.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More