Malta: Shattering The Norms Of Traditional Economics

Last Updated: 17 October 2013
Article by Mark Bamber and Jan Grech

Agents in an economy are supposed to be rational. People – wearing multiple hats as consumers, investors, employers or employees – take decisions on an everyday basis. The task at hand for decision-makers is seemingly simple and intuitive in that a decision (leading to an action, belief or desire) ought to be taken solely if the benefits outweigh the costs. If people always behave rationally, then why do we often observe behaviour which contradicts rational decision making?

In practical terms, why do we make commitments to follow a strict diet and a rigorous exercise routine, and postpone it to tomorrow? Why is it that we tip waiters whom we are never going to meet again? Why is the pain associated with a loss greater than the happiness associated with a win, even though the monetary amount at stake is the same? Why do we find it easier to spend with credit cards rather than splurging an equivalent amount of physical cash? These contradictions or perverse observations are not just anomalies of a general framework, occurring intermittently and rarely. Rather, shockingly enough, they are observed frequently in a consistent and predictable manner.

If you think that such biases in human behaviour are trivial and dismissible, think again! Irrational behaviour is the primary underlying factor which led to the property market bubble in the U.S., pulling down much of the world economy in recession. It is also at the heart of the sovereign debt crisis where irresponsible governments have borrowed and spent beyond sustainable levels. All of this leads to an important question. If decision-makers consistently make systematic errors, with wide-ranging and painful consequences, is it not reasonable (rational?) to ditch the traditional theories of economics and adopt this novel frame of mind? More importantly, from a micro perspective, are businesses fully aware of irrational behaviour and the effects it has on everyday decision-making?

Frame-up?

An example of a consistent bias.

In order to demonstrate how irrational human beings can be, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky conducted a simple experiment among University students, intended to show a violation of decision-making consistency and coherence. There are many ways in which the same decision problem can be framed, often by re-formulating wording, presenting additional alternatives or looking at the same option from a different perspective. However, framing the same decision problem differently should not, according to the principles of rationality, alter preferences. Surprisingly enough, due to human perception imperfections, preferences are affected!

Consider the following example1. Assume there is an outbreak of a new disease which, if untreated, is 1 Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), pp. 453-458. expected to kill 600 people. Due to resource constraints, the Government can implement either one of two Programmes: Programme A or Programme B. With Programme A, the government will distribute 200 vaccines. Therefore 200 lives will be saved for sure. With Programme B, the government will distribute vaccines to all 600, but the vaccine has a 1/3 probability that it will work (saving all 600 lives), and a 2/3 probability that it would not work (no people will be saved).

Many of you would choose Programme A over Programme B. In fact, 72% of respondents in the experiment chose A.

Now let us frame the decision problem differently. If Programme A is adopted, 400 people will die for sure. If Programme B is adopted, there is a 1/3 probability that nobody will die and a 2/3 probability that 600 people will die.2

Astonishingly, even though both decision problems are identical, 78 percent of respondents now chose Programme B. Re-framing has caused a shift of preferences.

From this Kahneman and Tversky deduced that, when faced with choices involving gains, we prefer certainty (risk-averse). When faced with choices involving losses, we would be willing to take a bet (risk-taking). This is only one type of human irrationality.

From where does this bias come from?

The human species is the smartest animal living on the planet. We are selfaware, creative and can demonstrate unmatched computational and metacognitive abilities. Particularly relevant to this discussion is our ability to reason, solve problems and make decisions. However, before we pat ourselves on the back for being smart, there is one thing to note – humans can also be incredibly obtuse when it comes to decision-making!

It is interesting to investigate the roots of this human ineptitude. This is far from being a case of a few bad apples making wrong decisions – humans can be predictably irrational as we make the same mistakes over and over again. Even when we receive negative feedback, and learn about our biases, we are still prone to such cognitive traps.

Laurie Santos, Professor of Psychology at Yale University, believes there are two hypotheses which can explain human biases and irrational behaviour. We are either subject to an overly complicated environment which we have artificially created ourselves, such as financial markets. In this sense, we are not capable of understanding the complexities of these systems and thus make consistent errors. Alternatively, humans are innately predisposed to conduct such errors.

To test this hypothesis, researchers have conducted experiments in controlled environments, which can be considered as the bread and butter of psychologists and behavioural economists. More specifically, to test whether human biases are the result of ancient evolutionary thrusts, researchers sought the help of our very close cousins – brown capuchin monkeys – which broke from the human evolutionary branch some 35 million years ago.

Monkeys were presented with simple economic decisions, using tokens to 'buy' food from human participants. Interestingly enough, the capuchins make very good monkey economists – they all prefer more to less when exchanging tokens for grapes.

However, in subsequent experiments, risk and uncertainty was introduced. Astonishingly, when monkeys were presented with two options – either 2 extra grapes with a 50/50 chance or 1 bonus grape for sure – monkeys chose the latter, playing it safe (risk-averse monkey) when facing bonuses. On the other hand, when monkeys were presented with losses – 2 less grapes with 50/50 chance or 1 less grape for sure – monkeys took a risk and chose the first option!

This underlines two types of biases both humans and monkeys exhibit – relativity and loss aversion. Clearly, we both treat losses differently than gains. It seems that we hate losing much more than we love winning, and this behaviour is ingrained in the nature of our evolutionary history.

What is important here is not the fact that evolution has shaped us with a cognitive mindset which displays consistent errors in judgement. What is important is that we can recognise our limitations, accept them, and figure a way to overcome them. In the same way humans have invented planes to overcome biological limitations, we can also invent tools to overcome our cognitive ineptitude.

Classical economics vs. behavioural economics

Classical economics thrives on the concept of Homo Economicus, a rational, logical and self-interested individual who weighs benefits and costs before taking a decision. Homo Economicus is not swayed by gut feelings. He does not mindlessly follow the herd, nor is he tricked by marketplace illusions. Conveniently enough, the rational Homo Economicus is perfect when it comes to designing elegant and rigorous economic theories and models which are meant to explain human behaviour in different contexts. But do they really?

Actual human beings are nothing like this. We often display behaviours which can be considered irrational, self-sabotaging or purely altruistic, contrasting starkly with Homo Economicus' characteristics. These perverse observations, which could not be explained by the prevailing economic wisdom, created quite a stir in the field of economics. Indeed, up until two decades ago, this sub-branch of economics called behavioural economics, lambasted by those who felt it challenged existing doctrines, was largely sidelined by neo-classicists. Nowadays, even though still relatively new, this discipline has garnered widespread attention and is the subject of highly interesting empirical research meshing psychology and economics.

From where did it all start?

The roots of behavioural economics can be traced back to the 1940's when Herbert A. Simon - a political scientist, economist, sociologist, and psychologist – developed the concept of "bounded rationality" which explains how humans take decisions within the limits (or boundaries) of available information, cognitive capacity shortcomings and limited time at hand. In this case, individuals do not seek to optimise every outcome arising out of a decision-making process, but rather opt for a satisfying outcome. Simon was eventually awarded a Nobel Prize in Economics (1978) for his pioneering work in the area of organisational decision-making within the context of uncertainty.

However, perhaps the starkest wakeup call to traditional economics was when Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky published a paper3 dealing with how individuals demonstrate inconsistent preferences when the same problem is presented in a different format. Unlike the prevailing economic doctrine at the time, which advocated that the actual value of alternatives is what matters most (implicitly assuming a rational decision-maker), the paper argued with distinctive mathematical rigour, that framing highly influences people's decisions. In other words, humans tend to act irrationally, since framing the same problem in a different way should not, in principle, affect choice preference.

This revolution in economic thinking sparked more research in the area, propelling behavioural economics from anathema in the late 70's to a lucrative and exciting discipline which still generates academic interest till this day. The principles of behavioural economics were first applied in the field of finance, and then later on permeated the fields of consumer choice, organisational decision-making and policy-making.

Concluding remarks

It might be tempting to consider behavioural economics as an alternative to the more traditional neo-classical economics, replacing more than 200 years of established doctrine. This is erroneous. Traditional economics and the standard economic model based on rationality can still be relevant for policy making. Behavioural economics merely adds a layer of complexity by relaxing the assumption of rationality, acknowledging that humans have bounded rationality, and their decisions are affected by seemingly trivial things.

In this respect, behavioural economics enhances the standard economic model, not replace it altogether. This discipline is still young and there is so much more to learn. Hopefully, by applying cognitive economic principles, we can better understand the intricacies of human behaviour in order to devise better macro-economic policies.

Footnotes

1. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., 1981. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), pp. 453-458.

2. 1/3 probability that nobody dies is equivalent to saying that the expected lives saved are 200. Similarly, 2/3 probability that 600 people will die is equivalent to 400 expected deaths. Notice how this is the same.

3. Source: Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), pp. 263-291.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Mark Bamber
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Practice Management
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.