Bermuda: Futter v HMRC And Pitt v HMRC: An Offshore Perspective

On 9 May 2013 the Supreme Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment in the jointly heard appeals of Futter v HMRC and Pitt v HMRC [2013] UKSC 26. The judgment has provided the courts of England and Wales with certainty on the so-called "rule in Hastings-Bass" and on the setting aside of voluntary dispositions on the grounds of mistake.

The judgment does not have a direct impact upon offshore jurisdictions, but those working in the fiduciary industry will inevitably wish to take note of the Supreme Court's decision, of the potential for offshore courts to follow suit and of the possible legislative responses. This article seeks to explain the key findings of the Supreme Court and what they may mean for those working offshore.

Pitt v HMRC, Futter v HMRC and the rule in Hastings-Bass

In essence, the rule in Hastings-Bass is concerned with the unpicking of decisions made by trustees without giving proper consideration to matters which ought to have been taken into account. The leading decision until now was given in the case of Sieff v Fox [2005] 1 WLR 3811, and was thought by HMRC to be too lenient on trustees who had taken tax advice that turned out to be defective.

It is now clear that for the Hastings-Bass rule to apply under English law, trustees' inadequate deliberations must have been "sufficiently serious as to amount to a breach of fiduciary duty". Without such a breach, the Court will not be entitled to intervene. Trustees that act in reliance upon professional advice (including tax advice that ultimately proves to be incorrect) will not, without having gone beyond the scope of their powers, be deemed to have acted in breach of duty.

Whilst tax consequences are relevant considerations for trustees to take into account, the Supreme Court warned that the "greater danger is not of trustees thinking too little about tax, but of tax and tax avoidance driving out consideration of other relevant matters."


The reformulated rule in Hastings-Bass will make it harder under English law for trustees to have decisions set aside on the basis that relevant considerations, and in particular negative tax consequences, were overlooked. In such circumstances, it is easy to foresee beneficiaries focusing sharply upon trustees and professional advisors in seeking to recover their losses. Whilst the Supreme Court's decision is likely to be persuasive in offshore jurisdictions, the courts are not bound to follow it and it is particularly apposite to note:

(i) That in Jersey consideration is actively being given to amending the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 so as to include a statutory version of the rule in Hastings-Bass as it existed prior to the Futter case. The intention would be to limit subsequent hostile litigation (between, inter alia, beneficiaries, trustees and expert advisors), save costs and provide certainty. It is likely, however, that even if the rule becomes part of Jersey law through statute, the decision on whether or not to grant relief under it in any particular case will be left to the Royal Court. Given the close ties between the Islands, and the need for them to remain competitive in the modern world, we would expect Guernsey and the Isle of Man to take this into account when amending their laws.

(ii) In the decision of Chief Justice Ground in the Bermuda case of GH & IJ v. KL (a section 47 application), he said that:

"While it may be that Evershed MR in the English Court of Appeal in Chapman v. Chapman [1953] 2 WLR 94 at 128 expressed a trenchant view that "it is no part of the functions of Her Majesty's courts to recast settlements from time to time merely with a view to tax avoidance," I think, with respect, that that is essentially obiter. In my judgment, if the proposal is otherwise plainly expedient, then there is no limitation in the statute which prevents its sanction simply on the grounds that it is designed in the interests of tax efficiency, and nothing to justify my importing such a restriction".

Pitt v HMRC: setting aside dispositions on the grounds of mistake

Where unforeseen consequences result from a settlor's transfer, it may be possible to have the transfer set aside on the grounds of mistake. Prior to Pitt there was, however, some inconsistency as to the circumstances that could give rise to this type of relief.

Previous case law suggested that the Court needed to distinguish between mistakes as to the "effect" and the "consequences" of a transaction before granting relief. This nuanced distinction could give rise to a relatively narrow (and not always readily identifiable) set of circumstances in which a transfer could be set aside. This approach had been rejected in the Isle of Man and in Jersey. The Supreme Court also rejected this approach in finding that the "true requirement" is for a "causative mistake of sufficient gravity [that] will normally be satisfied only when there is a mistake either as to the legal character or nature of a transaction, or as to some matter of fact or law which is basic to the transaction".

Following Pitt, a mistake must be distinguished from forgetfulness, mere ignorance or 'mispredictions', but the Court will closely examine the facts, circumstances and consequences in assessing the gravity of the mistake. It should also look at matters as a whole in determining whether it is just to leave a mistake uncorrected.

Whilst relief may still be available for mistakes that relate exclusively to tax, in cases of "artificial tax avoidance the court might think it right to refuse relief".


The Supreme Court's rejection of the effect/consequence distinction brings the English position into closer alignment with what could be termed the 'offshore' approach (most notably favoured by the courts of Jersey and the Isle of Man).

Lord Walker expressed misgivings (in the Pitt judgement) as to granting relief on the grounds of mistake where the only mistake had been as to tax consequences in the context of "artificial" tax avoidance are based on English public policy considerations. As the law currently stands in Jersey, such considerations would not concern the Royal Court. To quote from the judgement of Sir Philip Bailhache, in Re S Trust "the preference accorded to the interests of the tax authority in the UK is not one...with which we are sympathetic". The Royal Court was of the view that "Leviathan can look after itself"and that "in Jersey, it is still open to citizens so to arrange their affairs, so long as the arrangement is transparent and within the law, as to involve the lowest possible payment to the tax authority". But it is also likely that claims to set aside trustee decisions under the rule in Hastings-Bass may more often now be framed as claims to set them aside on the grounds of mistake.

The United Kingdom and Public Policy

It is clear that, in part, the decisions in these cases were based on public policy. In the modern world it would be naive to think that international financial centres can simply thumb their noses at onshore centres in their court decisions. Equally, though, is it right that their decisions should be determined by the public policies of other countries? And is the Privy Council therefore the correct final arbiter of their laws?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions