Is it true that globally mobile employees can sell their homes and not pay capital gains tax even if they rented it out for a number of years?
It is true in most cases. The general rule is that when you sell your home, the capital gain realised on the sale is exempt from capital gains tax. Based on the Income Tax Act, No 58 of 1962, you will pay no capital gains tax on the first R2,000,000 you make when you sell your home. There are, however, some restrictions on this exemption.
In order for the sale to be exempt, the home must be considered a primary residence based on income tax rules. These rules state that you must have used the home as your “primary residence”. Suppose that you are a globally mobile employee and invest in a new home in South Africa. You live in it for the first year, get a foreign assignment and rent the home for the next three years and, when the tenants move out, you move back in for another year. At the end of this five-year period, you sell your home.
How do you work out your capital gains tax liability? You used the property as your primary residence for 2 of the 5 years. Applying the primary residence test your capital gains tax exemption should only apply to those 2 years. Actually no, you may be able to sell the residence and not pay any capital gains tax at all. How is this achieved?
First, you must ensure that during the 3 year rental period you were either temporarily absent from South Africa or you were employed at a location further than 250 kilometres from the residence. Second, you must have resided in the home for a period of 1 year before and a period of 1 year after the rental period. Third, no other residence became your primary residence during the 3 year rental period. Fourth, and lastly, your period of absence from your home must not have exceeded 5 years.
If you satisfy all these requirements then you will be treated as having used the home for domestic purposes during your period of absence even if you were renting it out during that time. This means that you will be able to claim the capital gains tax exemption in full and not only for the 2 years that you actually stayed in the home.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide
to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Typically, a Modified Carry Arrangement is where an oil company finances petroleum operations on behalf of all parties to the contract including the NNPC and the oil company is expected to recover its cost...
In Star Deep Water Petroleum Ltd v. Lagos State Internal Revenue Service, the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT) Lagos division held that an assessment that is not compliant with the law cannot become final and conclusive.
Section 27(i) of the Companies Income Tax Act disallows "any expense of any description incurred outside Nigeria for and on behalf of any company except of a nature and to the extent that the Board ("FIRS") may consider allowable".
In May 2016, the Tax Appeal Tribunal (TAT) sitting in Lagos ruled that parties in Production Sharing Contracts (PSCs) with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), can take tax deduction for sole costs...
The South African Revenue Service recently published four draft interpretation notes dealing with the taxation of allowances and fringe benefit.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).