ARTICLE
20 September 2012

Retrospective Taxes Are Bad, Selective Retrospective Taxes Even Worse. Once Bitten, Twice Shy For The Chancellor?

M
Macfarlanes

Contributor

We are a distinctive law firm, combining expertise, agility, and a client-centric culture to address the most challenging legal demands and foster innovation. Our firm is structured around the needs of our clients, with whom we build long-lasting relationships, tackling complex issues in key practice areas.

Our approach is focused and deliberate. We assist clients with major transactions, including M&A, real estate, and financial products; handle significant litigation and investigations; and provide comprehensive private capital advice, particularly through our leading private client practice.

With offices in London and Brussels, and a strong international network, we collaborate with top lawyers globally to deliver the highest level of service. Our firm’s human-sized culture emphasizes long-term careers, fostering a cohesive, entrepreneurial environment where every team member can thrive.

Last Thursday, the Chancellor said in a Commons reply to Andrew Tyrie MP that retrospective taxes are acceptable where "the wishes of Parliament have been abused and avoided".
United Kingdom Tax

Last Thursday, the Chancellor said in a Commons reply to Andrew Tyrie MP that retrospective taxes are acceptable where "the wishes of Parliament have been abused and avoided". But, as we are often told, tax avoidance costs the UK £billions each year. Yet, there have been only a few instances of retrospective taxes in the last 10 years. The selective use of retrospective tax laws leaves an unpleasant taste in the mouth for anyone who believes that respect for the law applies to Government as well as the people. What was the basis of selection and was it fair and even-handed? Why did more egregious cases of avoidance go unpunished?

So, there is a rule of law issue here. The right way to tackle tax avoidance is by passing laws which make it ineffective in the future. Retrospective legislation needs to be a last resort, reserved for those cases where ample warning has been given of an intention to legislate in specific circumstances. If the Chancellor is prepared to use retrospective taxes to negate all avoidance, there would be no need of the GAAR which he is about to introduce. There was, however, some poetic justice in the outcome of the last instance of retrospection. The Chancellor accused the Indian Government of using retrospective taxes against British investors in India, only to have the accusation thrown back in his face.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More