In 2008, the Federal Court for Tax and Administrative Affairs
(FCTAA) created a Specialized IP Court to decide all the cases
related to IP rights, which started work in January 2009.
But whenever cases referred to arguments based on International
IP Treaties, such as the Paris Convention or TRIPS, the files were
sent to the High Bench of the FCTAA, as this Bench had exclusive
jurisdiction in this regard.
This generated two separate problems: the magistrates of the
High Bench mostly specialized in tax issues and decisions were
delayed for months, due to the Bench's backlog.
As a result the internal law of the FCTAA was amended last
month, empowering Specialized Courts to decide cases based on
At this point the only Specialized Court at the FCTAA is the IP
Court, but there are plans to open additional Specialized Courts,
starting with one on antitrust issues.
Additionally, the Federal Contentious Administrative Proceedings
Law (FCAPL) was amended to establish the "via sumaria"
(summary venue). This reform should reduce the periods provided to
parties, authorities, and the FCTAA to prosecute the nullity trial,
by establishing shorter deadlines.
At this venue, once the Court admits the trial, it has to
indicate the date to review and determine if the trial is ready for
the issuance of the decision on the merits, which cannot exceed 60
Lawsuits challenging administrative decisions going against
precedents set forth by the Mexican Supreme Court concerning
unconstitutional laws, or precedents from the High Bench of the
FCTAA, can be studied under this new venue.
The summary venue cannot be used for fines imposed for
infringement of IP rights, and therefore it will not be used in
patent or trademark infringement cases, but cancellation cases and
other decisions by the Mexican authorities with jurisdiction on IP
matters could be challenged through it.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Advocacia Pietro Ariboni Ariboni, Fabbri, Schmidt & Advogados Associados
The current Industrial Property Law, No. 9279/96, has been in
force in Brazil for over a decade. Generally speaking, the Law is
modern and in line with the principles of international treaties
such as TRIPS and the Paris Convention.
The Brazilian National Industrial Property Institute (INPI), by means of Resolution No. 107 of August 20, 2013, has changed the procedure to request recognition of highly renowned trademarks in order to simplify the proceeding.
The Industrial Property Law effective in Honduras was approved
by Decree No 12-99-E. Its dispositions are of public order and
have, inter alia, the objective of preventing acts against
industrial property or acts that constitute unfair competition.
While there is extensive case law protecting trade dress under the Unfair Competition Law, protection under trademark or industrial design law should be sought where possible
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”