Hong Kong: Sanctions For False Statements Of Truth

Last Updated: 15 September 2011
Article by Tom Fyfe and Melissa Chim

A court in Hong Kong has recently handed down significant custodial sentences (imprisonment) on two defendants who deliberately made or caused to be made false statements in court documents required to be verified by Statements of Truth. The recent case of re Kinform Limited DCMP 947 of 2011 (Kinform) appears to be the first example of such sentences since the civil justice reforms took effect in Hong Kong in April 2009. The case confirms that deliberately false Statements of Truth amount to contempt of court and can be visited with tough court sanctions.

Key points

  • A Statement of Truth should always be taken seriously and be made honestly.
  • Persons who make deliberately false Statements of Truth in court documents (such as witness statements, expert reports or pleadings) can expect to receive custodial sentences and not only a fine and/or an order of extra legal costs against them.
  • The same is true of those who cause others to make a deliberately false Statement of Truth on their behalf or who deliberately mislead their solicitors into making a false Statement of Truth.
  • Deliberately making a false Statement of Truth in a court document will be treated under the court's powers of committal for contempt of court.
  • It is not necessarily a defence to proceedings for contempt of court in connection with an allegedly deliberate false Statement of Truth that the court document concerned is not actually used at trial; a finding of contempt can still be made if the document verified by a false Statement of Truth is used in court proceedings and is likely to have interfered with the administration of justice (the court proceedings).
  • Proceedings for contempt of court in this context can be dealt with by a single judge in a civil court and not necessarily in a criminal court. That said, given the seriousness of a finding of contempt of court, such a finding should only be made pursuant to a criminal standard of proof; namely, beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Where the maker of a Statement of Truth is mistaken but not dishonest, then that does not amount to contempt (although such a mistake in a court document could adversely affect the outcome of the court proceedings for the party on whose behalf the document is used).
  • Where a solicitor makes a Statement of Truth on behalf of a client not realising that it is based on deliberately false instructions, the solicitor could be called as a witness in any contempt proceedings against the client. In these circumstances, the protection normally afforded to solicitor-client communications by legal professional privilege may not apply.


Statements of Truth were introduced into civil litigation proceedings in Hong Kong pursuant to the civil justice reforms in April 2009. Court documents such as pleadings (formal statements of case), witness statements and expert reports are required to be verified by a Statement of Truth (RHC O.41A r.2). The wording of a Statement of Truth is prescribed in the court rules (RHC O.41A r.5). One such example is:

"I believe that the facts stated in this [Witness Statement] are true".

Affidavits (or affirmations) are similar to witness statements but are generally used to give evidence at court hearings before a trial and do not require a Statement of Truth; however, affidavits (or affirmations) are also sworn (or affirmed), and if done so dishonestly can also result in contempt of court proceedings.


In Kinform the plaintiff sued several defendants for the price of goods sold and delivered. The defendants in their defence claimed that the goods were not of satisfactory quality. As part of the defence, the defendants relied on an alleged letter of complaint (the letter of complaint) which they claimed confirmed that the defendants had complained to the plaintiff about the goods before the court proceedings. In particular, the first defendant caused the defendant's solicitor to sign a Statement of Truth as to particulars of the defence that relied on the letter of complaint.

The plaintiff applied for early judgment (without trial) but that application failed in large measure because of the false defence particulars relating to the letter of complaint. The proceedings continued and subsequently the first and third defendants each gave a witness statement (containing a Statement of Truth) that also relied on the letter of complaint.

Following the exchange of documents between the parties, the plaintiff's solicitors became suspicious as to authenticity of the letter of complaint and whether it had been back-dated. The plaintiff's solicitors commenced proceedings for contempt of court against the first and third defendants based on, among other things, the Statements of Truth in the particulars of the defence and the two witness statements. At the beginning of the trial of the plaintiff's claim the defendants effectively abandoned their defence.


The main issue in the contempt of court proceedings was whether the plaintiff had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the letter of complaint was not authentic and, if so, whether the first and third defendants had deliberately caused to be made or had made false Statements of Truth.


The court found that the letter of complaint was not authentic and decided that three acts of contempt had been committed; two by the first defendant and one by the third defendant. The first defendant had committed contempt of court by causing the defendants' solicitors to make the Statement of Truth that they had in the particulars of the defence and in making a false Statement of Truth in his witness statement. The third defendant had also committed contempt of court with respect to the Statement of Truth in his witness statement.

The court held, among other things, that it was enough for a finding of contempt to be made that a false document had or was likely to have interfered with the course of justice. Whilst perjury was generally understood to relate to making a deliberately false court oath (for example, at trial), in terms of punishments, the court was content to refer to sentences for perjury (the maximum sentence for which in Hong Kong is seven years).

With this in mind the following passage of the court's judgment on sentencing makes for salutary reading:

"Like the commission of the offence of perjury, the giving of a false statement verified by a statement of truth would undermine the whole process of our system of justice and the Court will not tolerate such an act. A clear message has to be sent to all litigants that they must not lie when they put forward their case in the form of pleadings or witness statements".

The court sentenced the first and third defendants to periods of imprisonment of five and six months respectively. The third defendant came off slightly worse, having been an ex-employee of the plaintiff and, apparently, having shown less remorse than the first defendant.


As noted, this appears to be the first time that custodial sentences have been handed down in Hong Kong in connection with contempt of court proceedings arising out of deliberately false Statements of Truth. In doing so, the court has sent out a strong message.

Generally speaking, the perceived wisdom is that lower courts may be harsher in these sorts of situations than higher courts. However, irrespective of any appeal by the first and third defendants against the sentences, the court's underlying policy in handing down custodial sentences (as expressed in the above quoted passage) is likely to be favourably reviewed by a higher court.

In many other cases of contempt of court (involving, for example, willful breach of a court order) it not uncommon for a court to hand down a fine or, in more serious cases, a custodial sentence of weeks rather than months. In that light, the two sentences handed down in Kinform are noteworthy.

If that was not bad enough the case has presumably been an expensive exercise for the defendants. In addition to the custodial sentences, the court has also ordered that the defendants pay the plaintiff's legal costs on a higher basis and the overall outcome will presumably have a significant adverse effect on the defendants' livelihoods.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.