The Lower Chamber of Parliament has approved an amendment which
would formally remove the remaining restrictions for foreigners
buying property in the Czech Republic. The bill reflects the expiry
of the transition period applicable to agricultural land and
forestry areas that the Czech Republic negotiated upon their
accession to the EU.
Since joining the EU, the Czech Republic had been allowed to
apply a 5-year transition period for residential properties and a
7-year period for agricultural land and forests. As the latter
transitional period has not been extended, the general EU principle
of free movement of capital shall prevail. Consequently, as of 1
May 2011 there shall effectively be no legal obstacle for a foreign
investor to buy any kind of real estate in the Czech Republic. This
change will open new opportunities for foreigners to acquire
agricultural and forest land, which is still significantly cheaper
than in Western European countries.
This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron
McKenna's free online information service. To register for
Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq
Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance
only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now
articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to
give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates
to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication
and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent
The original publication date for this article was
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
The Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 4 July 2013 No. 131-V ЗРК 'On introducing amendments to certain legislative acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan in relation to introduction of new forms of Public Private Partnership and extension of spheres of its application' came into force on 22 July 2013.
The Republic of Cyprus (hereinafter "Cyprus") has been the target of many European Countries due to it's allegedly lack of money laundering measures that damage the European Union. Is the reaction of these European Union Countries justified?
Policy Exchange have published an excellent paper today on fiscal prudence and claim that 'the UK will continue to have one foot hovering precariously over a fiscal abyss unless the next government draws up a strong set of rules to tackle the £1.1 trillion national debt.'
Turkey as a member of NATO and due to its geographic location has been allocated the highest funds from the budget to defence industry for many years.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”