ARTICLE
31 March 2011

Dismissal And Vacation On The Same Day

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

Any period of vacation granted to an employee being dismissed should not be permitted to begin until the following day, to avoid claims that the employee is protected from dismissal.
Poland Employment and HR

Any period of vacation granted to an employee being dismissed should not be permitted to begin until the following day, to avoid claims that the employee is protected from dismissal.

The Supreme Court has clarified this issue in a case involving an employee who, in the same letter, was both dismissed and granted vacation starting on the same day.

The employee was handed the letter after finishing a night shift from 10pm to 6am.

Employees cannot be dismissed while on vacation under Article 41 of the Labour Code.

However, the Supreme Court ruled that:

  • Article 167(1) of the Labour Code implies that employees should use up any unused holiday entitlement during their notice period, where permitted by the employer
  • therefore there is no conflict between Article 167 (1) of the Labour Code and the employee protection under Article 41
  • this means it is permissible under the Labour Code to dismiss and grant vacation at the same time
  • in this case, the employee was dismissed first and then granted vacation (not the other way round)
  • the two events occurred on the same calendar day but on different working days: the vacation only began when the next night shift was due to start (at 10pm that evening)
  • the employee was not protected between the end of his last shift at 6 am and the start of his vacation at 10pm (which was the period in which he received the letter)

Law: Case No. II PK 116/10 (Supreme Court); Labour Code, articles 41, 167(1)

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 29/03/2011.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More