United States: Structured Thoughts - News For The Financial Services Community. March 29, 2010

In this issue of Structured Thoughts, we continue our discussion of regulatory initiatives affecting structured products in Europe, with a review of the complex/non-complex product question. We also provide a summary table of all current regulatory initiatives in Europe affecting structured products. This issue also includes a summary of the SEC's statement on the use of derivatives by funds, and a summary of the current state of legislation regulating derivatives and commodities.

CESR Public Consultation Relating to Application of the Mifid Appropriateness Test to Certain Structured Products

Suitability and Appropriateness Under Mifid

The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive consists of the Directive 2004/39/EC of 21st April 2004 on markets in financial instruments ("Mifid Level 1 Directive" or "Mifid L1"),1 together with the implementing Directive 2006/73/EC of 10th August 2006 as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms ("Mifid Level 2 Directive" or "Mifid L2")2 and the implementing Regulation (EC) No 1287/2006 of 10th August 2006 as regards record-keeping obligations for investment firms, transaction reporting, market transparency, admission of financial instruments to trading and defined terms (the "Mifid Level 2 Regulation").3

Under Mifid's conduct of business regime, an investment firm must assess the "suitability" and/ or "appropriateness" of a service or product it provides to its clients (or potential clients), depending on the complexity of the investment products involved.

  • Suitability test for advised sales: Whenever providing investment advice or discretionary portfolio management to a client (whether a "retail client" or a "professional client," including "eligible counterparties"4), an investment firm must appraise the investor's financial situation and investment objectives, in addition to the appropriateness of the product or service for the investor. (Mifid L1, Article 19(4); Mifid L2, Articles 36 and 37).
  • Appropriateness test for non-advised (execution only) sales: For other investment products or services, the appropriateness test should be applied, to determine whether the investor has the necessary knowledge and experience in the relevant investment field to understand the risks involved. (Mifid L1, Article 19(5); Mifid L2, Article 36).

However, the practical application of the appropriateness test is limited by the fact (i) that firms are entitled to assume that a professional client has the necessary knowledge and experience (Mifid L2, Article 35(2)) and (ii) that certain transactions in "non-complex" financial instruments which are initiated by the investor are exempted (Mifid L1, Article 19(6)) (the "execution only exemption").

Product Categorisation: Complex vs. Non-Complex Instruments

How a particular product or instrument is categorised is significant under Mifid, as one of its key objectives is to prevent complex products from being sold on an "execution only" (i.e., non-advised) basis to retail investors, unless the seller is satisfied that retail investors have the experience and/or knowledge to understand the risks involved.

Consequently, the Committee of European Securities Regulators ("CESR") has focused its analysis on financial instruments which are, or can be, transacted by retail clients.

Non-complex instruments

Under paragraph 6 of Mifid L1, Article 19 (Conduct of business obligations when providing investment services to clients), "non-complex" instruments include:

  • shares admitted to trading on a regulated market or in an equivalent third country market;
  • money market instruments;
  • bonds or other forms of securitised debt (excluding those bonds or securitised debt that embed a derivative);
  • UCITS (and other collective investment undertakings); and
  • other non-complex financial instruments.

For what constitutes other (not automatically) non-complex financial instruments, an in-depth risk-based analysis must be carried out to determine whether the instruments can be classified as complex or non-complex for the purpose of the appropriateness test.

For this purpose, the criteria are laid down in Mifid L2, Article 38 (Provision of services in non-complex instruments) as follows:

  • the product or instrument must not fall within paragraphs 4 to 10 of Mifid L1, Annex I (List of Services and Activities and Financial Instruments), Section C (Financial Instruments), which lists practically all forms of options, futures, swaps and other derivatives relating to securities, currencies, interest rates, financial indices, commodities or other assets, as well as derivative instruments for the transfer of credit risk and financial contracts for differences ("CFDs");
  • it does not fall within paragraph 1(18) of Mifid L1, Article 4 (Definitions) ("transferable securities"), subparagraph (c), i.e., any other securities which give the right to buy or sell any such transferable securities or which give rise to a cash settlement by reference to transferable securities, currencies, interest rates, indices or commodities;
  • there are "frequent opportunities to dispose of, redeem, or otherwise realise" at publicly available prices, i.e., either market prices or prices made available (or validated) by independent valuation systems;
  • it does not involve any actual or potential liability exceeding the cost of acquiring the instrument; and
  • "adequately comprehensive information on its characteristics is publicly available and is likely to be readily understood" to enable an average retail client to make an informed investment decision.

To such (other non-complex) instruments, the "execution-only" exemption is not available in relation to retail clients and the appropriateness test always applies.

The rationale for such treatment is that the complexity of the instrument impacts an investor's ability to understand the risks involved and consequently the level of investor protection called for. As derivative instruments derive their value from another instrument or asset, embedding a derivatives adds another layer of complexity which investors need to examine before they are able to make an informed investment decision.

It has, however, been noted by some commentators that there is not necessarily a correlation between complexity and risk and the inclusion of a derivative within a product can limit some of the risk the investor would otherwise assume. It has also been noted that some products with embedded derivatives are still relatively easy to understand and the broad brush approach of preventing all products embedding a derivative from applying the execution-only exemption is not necessarily appropriate.

Complex instruments

As indicated above, other financial instruments which are covered by paragraphs 4 to 10 of Mifid L1, Annex I, Section C, or paragraph 1(18)(c) of Mifid L1, Article 4 as described above are deemed to be complex.

CESR Consultation Paper: Mifid Complex and Non-Complex Financial Instruments for the Purpose of the Directive's Appropriateness Requirements (14th May 2009)5

Noting that recent market developments have altered the risk profile of many financial instruments, making it even more difficult to gauge the associated risks, particularly for retail investors, on 14th May 2009, CESR launched a public consultation to highlight certain issues relating to how the "appropriateness" requirements apply to "complex" versus "non-complex" financial instruments under Mifid.

In the consultation paper, CESR outlined its views on the interpretation and application of the specified categories of (automatically) "non-complex" instruments under Mifid L1, Article 19(6), and the criteria applied to "other noncomplex" instruments under Mifid L2, Article 38, and invited comments from market participants.

Specifically, CESR listed in Annex I a range of types of Mifid financial instruments according to the following three categories:

  1. Automatically non-complex (under Mifid L1, Article 19(6)), which lists, among other products (i) ordinary (common & preference) shares; (ii) money market instruments and bonds which do not embed a derivative, specifically including "traditional covered bonds" (but not "structured covered bonds"); and (iii) UCITS.
  2. Other non-complex instruments to be assessed against the criteria in Mifid L2, Article 38, which lists, among other products, (i) shares not admitted to trading on a regulated market or admitted to trading in a third country market; (ii) depositary receipts for shares or for bonds or other forms of securitised debt; (iii) non- UCITS funds (unless the final Directive on Alternative Investment Fund Managers ("AIFM Directive") prescribes a different treatment);6 and (iv) other instruments not specifically mentioned in Mifid L1, Article 19(6).
  3. "Always complex" according to the criteria in Mifid L2, Article 38(a), which largely lists financial instruments which are covered by paragraphs 4 to 10 of Mifid L1, Annex I, Section C, or paragraph 1(18)(c) of Mifid L1, Article 4, including: (i) swaps, options, futures and other derivatives; (ii) subscription rights, callable shares, convertibles shares; (iii) money market instruments and bonds which embed a derivative, such as structured instruments including convertible bonds, exchangeable bonds, callable/puttable bonds, credit-linked notes, index-linked notes, asset-backed securities ("ABS"), collateralised debt obligations ("CDO") and structured covered bonds; and (iv) warrants and CFDs.

Referring to these lists as illustrative and non-exhaustive lists of examples, CESR then stipulated 33 specific questions for market participants to consider for possible comment. In particular:

  • the proposed categorisations of certain instruments, particularly as regards the debt versus equity or UCITS versus non-UCITS distinctions or references and the treatments of subscription rights, convertibles, derivatives, ABS, covered bonds and other forms of securitised debt; and
  • the factors potentially relevant to the interpretation and application of Mifid L2, Article 38 (for example, lack of liquidity) and the definition of certain concepts under it (for example, "frequent opportunities to dispose," "publicly available" prices or other information).

CESR Feedback Statement and Q&As

On 3rd November 2009, CESR published a feedback statement,7 together with a Q&A paper,8 in relation to its public consultation which closed on 17th July 2009.

In the consultation paper, CESR had sought feedback on its illustrative and non-exhaustive categorisations of Mifid financial instruments and its views on how they were likely to fit within the complex and non-complex categories, for the purposes of the appropriateness test under Mifid L1, Article 19(5) and Mifid L2, Articles 36 (Assessment of appropriateness) and 37 (Provisions common to the assessment of suitability and appropriateness).

The following is a summary of CESR's responses to the principal issues, as set out in its feedback statement:

  • Depositary receipts: CESR clarifies that depositary receipts in respect of shares fall outside the definition of "shares" under Mifid L1, Article 19(6) and must be assessed against the Mifid L2, Article 38 criteria.
  • Convertible shares: CESR believes that convertible shares (i.e., convertible preference shares) are complex as they fall within the type of transferable securities described in Mifid L1, Article 4(1)(18)(c), which are expressly excluded from eligibility as "other non-complex financial instruments" under Mifid L1, Article 38.
  • Subscription rights: CESR accepts that, where subscription rights are being purchased or exercised in the primary market, they should be regarded as part of the relevant share or other financial instrument being offered, not as separate financial instruments in themselves, and given the same categorisation as the share or instrument. However, where subscription rights are being purchased in the secondary market, CESR believes they should be regarded as "complex" under the Mifid L1, Article 38 criteria, as they fall within Mifid L1, Article 4(1)(18)(c).
  • Other forms of securitised debt: Although money market instruments and traditional bonds (including traditional covered bonds) should continue to be treated as non-complex unless they embed a derivative, CESR believes there are different types of investments that could fall under the category of "other forms of securitised debt," not all of which can accurately be described as non-complex. Although it accepts that some instruments may be easier to understand than others, CESR believes that the majority of these instruments should be categorised as complex, either because they embed a derivative (e.g., all ABS) or because the complexity of their structure makes them difficult to understand. CESR is, however, prepared to revise its previous position for a third group of products (e.g., some structured products) that could be assessed against the Article 38 criteria and treated as non-complex.
  • Instruments embedding a derivative: CESR notes that many respondents contested the view that instruments embedding a derivative should always be regarded as inherently complex and that many believed the determining factor should be whether the presence of the derivative creates or increases risks.
  • Fixed income products: CESR believes that the general treatment of fixed income products and their categorisation as complex or non-complex should be considered in the forthcoming Mifid review by the European Commission (the "Commission").
  • Structured deposits: CESR clarifies its agreement with the Commission's position that deposits are strictly banking products and that only deposits embedding a derivative (with the potential to reduce the initial investment) fall within the scope of Mifid and would be treated as complex.
  • Convertible and exchangeable bonds: CESR believes convertible and exchangeable bonds should be regarded as complex because they embed derivatives. CESR notes that if an instrument is explicitly excluded from the non-complex list in Mifid L1, Article 19(6), it cannot gain non-complex status through Mifid L2, Article 38.
  • Callable and puttable bonds: CESR believes callable and puttable bonds should be regarded as complex, as they embed a call or a put option. CESR disagrees with respondents which argued that these should either be treated as automatically non-complex or be assessed against the Article 38 criteria.
  • Covered bonds: Whilst accepting that the on- and off-balance sheet structures may have a mere difference of legal form rather than substance, CESR considers that only traditional covered bonds fall within the meaning of "bonds" under Article 19(6) which are automatically non-complex. Pending the Mifid review, structured covered bonds should be treated as complex if they embed a derivative or incorporate a complex structure, and otherwise assessed against the Article 38 criteria.
  • UCITS and other collective investment schemes: CESR notes that, under Mifid L1, Article 19(6), UCITS is automatically non-complex even if it invests in some complex instruments. Units in other types of collective investment schemes must be assessed against the Article 38 criteria, although CESR notes that the AIFM Directive will have a bearing upon the treatment of funds that are not UCITS.
  • Exchange Traded Commodities ("ETCs"): There is a range of different structures in use for ETCs which must be assessed on a case by case basis. However, CESR believes that most of them are likely to be categorised as complex, due to being structured as a CFD or as a debt instrument or other transferable security embedding a derivative.

The Q&A confirms and clarifies CESR's approach to categorisation described in the feedback statement, including the treatment of:

  • shares and subscription rights;
  • money market instruments, bonds and other forms of securitised debt;
  • units in collective investment undertakings, including both UCITS and non-UCITS;
  • certain other products, such as ETCs; and
  • other non-complex financial instruments according to the Article 38 criteria.

Next Steps

The Commission is due to carry out a post-implementation review of Mifid in 2010.

In its feedback statement on complex vs. non-complex instruments for the Mifid appropriateness test, CESR also expressed the view that the Commission should consider in its Mifid review, inter alia, the treatment of (i) shares admitted to trading on an MTF (possibly amending Article 19(6) for automatically non-complex treatment, rather than assessment under Article 38 criteria), (ii) secondary market disposals of subscription rights and (iii) fixed income products.

CESR disclaimed any attempt on its part to address any current or future proposals by the Commission to extend the application of the Mifid standards.

In late 2009, CESR also conducted public consultations on other issues arising under Mifid, including those on "Understanding the definition of advice under Mifid"9 and "Inducements: Good & poor practices."10 CESR is expected to publish its feedback statements in due course.


1 The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive consists of the Directive 2004/39/EC of 21st April 2004 on markets in financial instruments, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/l_145/l_14520040430en00010044.pdf .

2 Directive 2006/73/EC of 10th August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive, http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_241/l_24120060902en00260058.pdf .

3 Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1287/2006 of 10th August 2006 implementing Directive 2004/39/EC as regards record-keeping obligations for investment firms, transaction reporting, market transparency, admission of financial instruments to trading, and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2006/l_241/l_24120060902en00010025.pdf .

4 Under Mifid L1, Article 24(2), "eligible counterparties" include regulated banks, investment firms, insurance companies, collective investment schemes or pension funds and their management companies, as well as national governments, public bodies, central banks and supranational organisations. Mifid L1, Annex II defines "professional clients" to include, as well as eligible counterparties, (i) large undertakings meeting 2 out of 3 size requirements as to balance sheet total (at least €20 million), net turnover (at least €20 million) and/or own funds (at least €2 million) and other institutions investors under Mifid L1, Annex II (Professional Clients for the purpose of this Directive) and (ii) other clients who have opted in to be treated as professional clients, subject to meeting 2 out of 3 criteria relating to experience, knowledge and size of financial instruments portfolio (at least €500,000, including cash deposits). A "retail client" is a client who is not a professional client. Mifid L1, Article 4(1)(12).

5 CESR Consultation Paper: Mifid complex and non-complex financial instruments for the purpose of the Directive's appropriateness requirements (14th May 2009), http://www.cesr.eu/popup2.php?id=5721 (comments deadline: 17th July 2009).

6 See Morrison & Foerster News Bulletin: Update on the proposed AIFM Directive (25th February 2010), http://www.mofo.com/files/Publication/b75a43ea-af81-42eb-9c29-6a6ed92a397c/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/796feb3f-01be-4e8d-8c44-70f4953d27ae/100225AIFM.pdf .

7 CESR Feedback Statement: Mifid complex and non-complex financial instruments for the purposes of the Directive's appropriateness requirements (3rd November 2009), http://www.cesr-eu.org/data/document/09_558.pdf .

8 CESR Q&A: Mifid complex and non-complex financial instruments for the purposes of the Directive's appropriateness requirements (3rd November 2009), http://www.cesr.eu/popup2.php?id=6158 .

9 CESR Consultation Paper: Understanding the definition of advice under MiFID (14th October 2009), http://www.cesr.eu/popup2.php?id=6137 (comments deadline: 14th December 2010).

10 CESR Consultation Paper: Inducements: Good & poor practices (22nd October 2009), http://www.cesr.eu/popup2.php?id=6146 (comments deadline: 22nd December 2010).

To read this document in its entirety please click here.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Peter Green
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.