United States: Self-Charged Management Fees Under The Passive Loss Rules

Last Updated: December 14 2000
Article by Ronald A Morris

Where an individual or other person subject to the passive loss rules owns an interest in a passive activity and also lends money or provides services to the activity, the question arises as to whether the non-passive interest or fee income received may be offset by the person's share of expenses and losses of the passive activity. Proposed regulations generally permit a netting of the interest expense of the passive activity (often referred to as self-charged interest) against interest income, but do not specifically address other types of self-charged income or expense.

The Tax Court recently held that an individual's share of management fee expenses incurred by pass-through entities engaged in passive activities, consisting of fees paid to an S corporation of which the individual was the principal shareholder, may be offset against the fee income allocated to the individual as a shareholder of the S corporation. Hillman v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. No. 6 (February 29, 2000). Thus, the fee income could be offset by management fee expenses under the passive loss rules. The decision is noteworthy not only for its conclusion on the substantive issue presented, but also for its analysis regarding (i) the effect of statutory language directing that regulations be issued to implement provisions of the statute and (ii) the impact of an alleged failure by Treasury to comply fully with such directives.

Background

The passive loss rules under section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") generally limit the deductibility of losses from passive activities, as incurred by an individual, closely held corporation, or certain other persons, to such person's income from passive activities for the taxable period. The term "passive activity" generally includes any "rental activity", that is, an activity "where payments are principally for the use of tangible property" (including real property), regardless of whether the taxpayer materially participates in that activity.

In real estate as well as other contexts, an individual or other person subject to the passive loss rules frequently has more than one economic interest in a rental activity. For example, a member of a partnership conducting a rental activity may also derive interest or fee income from a loan to the partnership or from management or other services provided to the partnership.

Generally, interest income attributable to a loan or fees attributable to the provision of services to an entity conducting a passive activity will not be treated as income from that activity, and therefore will not be taken into account in determining passive income or loss from that activity. Thus, for example (absent the application of the special rule discussed below), if the sole shareholder of an S corporation receives $10 of interest annually under a debt obligation of the corporation held by him, the corporation conducts a rental activity, and the rental activity operates on a break-even basis excluding the interest expense (such that the corporation has a net loss of $10 after the interest expense), the individual's $10 of interest income from the loan cannot be offset by the $10 of passive loss passed through to the individual as a shareholder of the S corporation -- notwithstanding that, on an aggregate basis, the individual has no net income from his combined holdings as a creditor and stockholder of the corporation.

When the passive loss rules were enacted in 1986, subsection (k) of section 469 (now subsection (l)) provided, in relevant part, that "The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out provisions of [section 469], including regulations . . . (2) which provide that certain items of gross income will not be taken into account in determining income or loss from any activity (and the treatment of expenses allocable to such income)."

Although the statute does not refer specifically to self-charged interest or other items, the Conference Report for the Tax Reform Act of 1986 identified the treatment of self-charged interest as an issue, and stated that a taxpayer receiving interest income with respect to a loan to a pass-through entity in which he has an ownership interest should be allowed to offset the interest expense passed through to the taxpayer against the interest income. The Report also stated that the regulations expected to address self-charged interest "may also, to the extent appropriate, identify other situations in which netting of the kind described above [for self-charged interest] is appropriate with respect to a payment to a taxpayer by an entity in which he has an ownership interest" (H.R. 99-841, at II-147 (1986)).

In 1991, the IRS proposed a regulation setting forth rules applicable to lending transactions between a taxpayer and a pass-through entity in which the taxpayer holds a direct or qualifying indirect interest. Where the taxpayer holding an ownership interest in a pass-through entity has lent money to the entity, the proposed regulation recharacterizes the interest income attributable to the loan as passive activity income, thus permitting a netting against that income of the taxpayer's share of passive interest expense of the entity.

The regulation (Prop. Reg. § 1.469-7) was proposed to be effective for taxable years after 1986, but has not yet been finalized. No similar "netting" rules were proposed with respect to other self-charged items, such as management fees for services provided to a pass-through entity by the holder of an ownership interest in the entity.

The 'Hillman' Case

David Hillman ("Hillman") owned, throughout 1993 and 1994 (the years at issue), more than 90% of the stock of Southern Management Corporation ("SMC"), an S corporation. SMC provided real estate management services to approximately 90 partnerships, joint ventures, and other pass-through entities (collectively the "partnerships") that were involved in real estate rental activities.

Hillman also owned, directly or through an upper-tier entity, interests in each of the partnerships.

The opinion states that Hillman did not participate in the activities of the partnerships during the years at issue, but that Hillman did materially participate in the real estate management activity of SMC.

Hillman and his wife (the petitioners) received compensation from SMC which was deducted by SMC as an expense. SMC in turn separately reported management fee income (after deduction of expenses) on the Schedule K-1s issued by the corporation to Hillman.

The management fee expenses of the partnerships were "passive" since the fees were incurred in real estate rental activities. The portion of the management fee paid by each partnership to SMC that was allocable to Hillman's ownership interest in the partnership, however, was treated by the petitioners as an expense incurred in non-passive activities.

The IRS issued a notice of deficiency disallowing the petitioners' treatment of the management fee expenses passed through to Hillman as non-passive. The notice of deficiency referred to the proposed regulation providing that certain interest from lending transactions may be treated as self-charged (and therefore netted). The disallowance was apparently based on the fact that no regulation had been issued concerning special treatment of self-charged items other than interest.

Consistent with the notice of determination, the Commissioner argued before the Tax Court that the netting result sought by the petitioners was available only as to lending transactions with respect to which the proposed regulation permitted self-charged interest income to offset interest expense. Since no regulation had been issued permitting netting of other self-charged items, Hillman was not entitled, under the passive loss rules, to offset his share of management fee expenses against associated management fee income.

The court observed that the Commissioner did not dispute that the circumstances before the court comported with the circumstances described in the proposed regulation referred to above that permit netting, but for the fact that the proposed regulation dealt with interest and not management fee expenses.

The petitioners argued that the proposed regulation was arbitrary, capricious, and in violation of the Congressional mandate to issue appropriate regulations under section 469, insofar as the proposed regulation omitted provisions to address self-charged items other than interest. They also argued that in the absence of specific regulations dealing with items other than interest, the court should interpret the statute, in light of the legislative history, as authorizing special treatment (that is, netting) for other self-charged items.

The court ultimately accepted the petitioners' argument that the provision of section 469 requiring Treasury to prescribe appropriate regulations was "self-executing" with respect to this issue, and therefore that (at least absent any specific regulation to the contrary) netting should be permitted with respect to self-charged items in addition to interest.

The opinion states that in light of the legislative history calling for netting of at least some self-charged items, and the statutory directive to issue such regulations as are appropriate to implement section 469, the Commissioner's position that specific regulations were necessary to permit netting with respect to non-lending transactions, and that such netting could not occur absent an applicable regulation, was difficult to accept.

Having decided that the absence of regulations on self-charged items for non-lending transactions did not justify the Commissioner's conclusion that no such netting was permissible, the court quickly concluded that netting should be permitted under the circumstances presented in this case.

The court observed that, to the extent of Hillman's allocable share of the partnerships' management fees, there was no "net accretion of wealth" to Hillman by reason of the management service fees; in effect, Hillman was simply paying the fees to himself. The court then reasoned that requiring Hillman to include those fees in his income, while suspending the offsetting deduction under the passive loss rules, would result in a mismatch (of income and expense) and not advance any established tax policy.

Observations

On a technical level, the Commissioner's argument that the statute, and perhaps the committee reports (to the extent relevant), gave the IRS the discretion to decide whether or not to permit any netting of self-charged expenses other than interest, and that by not issuing such regulations netting was effectively disallowed by the statute itself, had some merit, especially since the provision authorizing regulations did not specifically refer to self-charged interest or other items.

The court was clearly troubled, however, by the failure of the government to present any argument as to why netting, apparently permissible for lending transactions, should not be permitted for self-charged amounts arising from other transactions. Also, the circumstance that the government was prepared to give operative effect to a proposed regulation to permit the desired netting treatment with respect to self-charged interest may have effectively precluded the Commissioner from arguing, notwithstanding the committee report discussion referred to above, that no special rule was appropriate for self-charged items as a class.

If regulations had been issued dealing with self-charged expenses in non-lending transactions, it appears highly likely to the authors that, taking into account the legislative history and the underlying policy considerations, such regulations would have permitted netting in the circumstances before the court. If the court was of the same view, it may well have considered it unfair for the IRS to attempt to deny the taxpayers the same treatment merely because no such regulations had been issued.

Perhaps the most surprising aspect of the case is the Commissioner's decision to pursue this tax deficiency in the courts without being prepared to justify the failure to issue a regulation addressing the treatment of self-charged items other than interest (or to finalize Prop. Reg. § 1.469-7), or to otherwise address as a substantive matter whether netting should be permitted for such items.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Ronald A Morris
 
In association with
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
Accounting and Audit
Anti-trust/Competition Law
Consumer Protection
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy, Re-structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Transport
Wealth Management
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.