ARTICLE
11 October 2019

Voice Broker Settles CFTC Charges For Misappropriating Confidential Customer Information

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A voice broker settled CFTC charges for (i) mishandling confidential customer information, (ii) failing to retain audio recordings of block trades and (iii) failing to supervise.
United States Finance and Banking

A voice broker settled CFTC charges for (i) mishandling confidential customer information, (ii) failing to retain audio recordings of block trades and (iii) failing to supervise. The voice broker ("owner") was the founder, president, sole member, and associated person of a firm registered as an introducing broker ("IB").

According to the CFTC, the owner failed to disclose to customers that he was acting as a counterparty when facilitating block trades between IB customers and the firm's proprietary trading account. As a result, the CFTC stated, the owner (i) misappropriated material nonpublic information by trading on customers' block trade orders and (ii) created a "false impression" to customers that he was their broker instead of a potential counterparty. As a result, the CFTC alleged, the owner realized over $400,000 in trading profits in his proprietary trading account.

Additionally, the CFTC found that the owner failed to retain audio recordings of his block trades conducted over the phone. The CFTC found that a third party, to which the owner outsourced the audio recordings, had experienced a technical issue which resulted in the loss of all of the recordings.

To settle the CFTC charges, the IB and owner jointly agreed to (i) cease and desist from violating CFTC regulations, (ii) pay a civil monetary penalty of $1.5 million, (iii) a suspension until January 3, 2022 and (iv) comply with the conditions and undertakings outlined in the Offer.

Commentary

Bob Zwirb

While there is no information relating to how the amount of the respondent's alleged wrongful gains was determined, the Order here represents one of the clearest and most informative descriptions by the CFTC of the alleged wrongdoing, how the conduct runs afoul of the CEA and CFTC rules, and why the conduct harmed customers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More