United States: Sixth Circuit Allows Discovery In Private International Commercial Arbitrations

Last Updated: October 1 2019
Article by Sabrina N. Jiwani, Paul M. Levine and Gonzalo S. Zeballos

28 U.S.C. § 1782 is a powerful tool that permits foreign litigants to obtain broad U.S. discovery in aid of their foreign court litigation. Bank records and key documents can be obtained and witnesses can be deposed – all with a subpoena, just like in any federal litigation. But whether this discovery could be used in private commercial international arbitration was an unresolved question. Indeed, the appellate courts that had addressed this issue previously had essentially prevented litigants from using § 1782 to aid their international arbitrations.

Therefore, the recent ruling from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Abdul Latif Jameel Transportation Company Ltd. v. FedEx Corporation, 2019 WL 4509287 (6th Cir. Sept. 19, 2019) was significant. The Sixth Circuit has issued the first appellate ruling that expressly holds § 1782 does apply to private international arbitrations.

Litigants involved with private commercial arbitrations can now seek evidence in the Sixth Circuit – and potentially others – using this detailed opinion as justification. Anyone contemplating or engaged in a contract with an international arbitration clause should think carefully about whether they should (or should not) contract around U.S. discovery or, at the very least, address the point during the early stages of an arbitration. And persons holding yet-to-be-confirmed arbitration awards can consider taking § 1782 discovery sooner rather than later in an effort to recover assets.

Prior Landscape of § 1782

Section 1782 enables foreign litigants to use the United States’ broad discovery process to obtain documents and evidence which may be otherwise unavailable within the confines of a foreign proceeding. The statute provides that “any interested person” involved in proceedings before a “foreign or international tribunal” may obtain evidence from any person or entity located in the United States. In addition to its aid in litigation, § 1782 is extremely powerful tool to that allows judgment creditors to use the U.S. discovery to locate assets.

But prior attempts to use § 1782 in private international commercial arbitrations have led to mixed results. The Second and Fifth Circuits both stated that the word “tribunal” did not include private foreign arbitrations and, instead, would apply only to governmental tribunals and other state-sponsored adjudicatory bodies.1 In addition, most (but not all) district courts found that § 1782 was inapplicable to private commercial arbitrations.2

The Intel Decision

In 2004, the Supreme Court rendered its opinion in Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 542 U.S. 241 (2004). That opinion is the seminal decision in all § 1782 litigation, providing the key test in how to obtain evidence under the statute. The Supreme Court required that all applicants under § 1782 meet the three mandatory factors in the statute, which requires that the applicant is an “interested person” seeking discovery from a person or entity located in the judicial district for use before a “foreign or international tribunal.” If so, four more discretionary factors were weighed:

  1. Is the person from who discovery is sought an entity to the foreign proceeding where discovery could be had?
  2. The nature of the foreign tribunal, the character of that proceeding and the receptivity of the foreign tribunal to U.S. court assistance.
  3. Is the § 1782 discovery an attempt to circumvent foreign proof gathering restrictions?
  4. Whether the discovery sought is unduly burdensome.

In addition, the Supreme Court hinted, without expressly deciding, that § 1782 evidence could be obtained for foreign commercial arbitrations. The Supreme Court looked to a functional test – was the foreign tribunal a “first instance decisionmaker” that gathers and weighs evidence to resolve a dispute – to determine a quasi-judicial body could be a tribunal under § 1782.

After Intel, the Eleventh Circuit revisited the meaning of “tribunal” under § 1782. The Eleventh Circuit was initially receptive to applying § 1782 to private international arbitrations, stating that Intel provided substantial guidance in favor of adopting a broader definition of “tribunal” to include arbitration proceedings.3 This decision was short-lived, as two years later the Eleventh Circuit sua sponte vacated its 2012 opinion and replaced it with a narrower one (that still authorized the discovery).4

The Abdul Latif Decision

The Sixth Circuit’s decision arose from two arbitrations: (1) one pending in Dubai pursuant to the rules of the Dubai International Financial Centre-London Court of International Arbitration; and (2) the other in Saudi Arabia. The § 1782 applicant sought documents related to the contract negotiations and performance of two contracts between it and the foreign subsidiary of the respondent (a U.S. corporation). The United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee in Memphis, where the respondent is located, denied the application because private international commercial arbitrations were not “foreign or international tribunals” and the statute did not encompass the foreign arbitration because § 1782 does not define “tribunal.”

The Sixth Circuit reversed. “We hold that this provision permits discovery for use in the private commercial arbitration at issue.” The court examined the word “tribunal” according to both dictionary definitions and use of the word “tribunal” in legal writing. A review of United States sources showed that American lawyers and judges have long understood the word “tribunal” to include privately contracted-for arbitrations. The Second and Fifth Circuits’ decisions, based largely on an interpretation of the legislative history, got that history wrong and, in any event, ignored the plain terms of the statute. The variety of policy considerations argued against § 1782 discovery could not overcome the plain terms of the statute. And the Sixth Circuit made clear that the discretionary factors enunciated in Intel could still limit or deny discovery, just as in every § 1782 application.

Future Considerations

The Sixth Circuit’s opinion can be used powerfully. Most obviously, discovery can be obtained within the Sixth Circuit for a foreign commercial arbitration. Litigants engaged in foreign commercial arbitrations now have a direct vehicle to expand their discovery options in foreign arbitrations (subject to any restrictions in those foreign arbitrations).

This decision will have ramifications in other circuits. The Eleventh Circuit had previously adopted this approach, only to change its mind later on. Other circuits have yet to reach the issue. And the Second and Fifth Circuits may need to look anew to their prior pre-Intel decisions.

Anyone with an international arbitration clause must consider the ramifications of this opinion. Did you assume that an international arbitration would not lead to U.S. discovery? That may not be the case. Parties, of course, can contract around this eventuality if they so desire and, at a minimum, can address the possibility of § 1782 discovery in an early procedural hearing with the arbitrators.

Holders of arbitration awards typically had to wait for confirmed judgments, which sometimes took years to resolve before foreign vacatur proceedings. Those parties should consider moving forward with § 1782 discovery in the United States to start locating assets.


1 Republic of Kazakhstan v. Biederman Int’l, 168 F.3d 880, 881 (5th Cir. 1999) (holding that there was no evidence of congressional intent to extend § 1782’s reach to international commercial arbitration); NBC v. Bear Stearns & Co., 165 F.3d 184 (2nd Cir. 1999). These private commercial arbitrations are different than international investment arbitrations involving foreign governments, which have consistently been held to be “tribunals” for the purposes of § 1782. E.g., In re Application of Chevron Corp., 709 F. Supp. 2d 283, 291 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).

2 Compare In re Winning (HK) Shipping Co. Ltd., 2010 WL 1796579 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 30, 2010) (concluding that a private international arbitration conducted by the London Maritime Arbitrators Association constituted a § 1782(a) tribunal because the arbitration arose pursuant to a private agreement and could collect evidence and issue a decision on the merits) with In re Operadora DB Mexico, S.A. DE C.II., 2009 WL 2423138 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2009) (concluding that the ICC International Court of Arbitration was not a § 1782(a) tribunal because it issued decisions that were not judicially reviewable, derived power from a private agreement and was tasked with resolving disputes independently of state-sponsored tribunals).

3 In re Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A., 685 F.3d 987 (11th Cir. 2012).

4 In re Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones S.A., 2014 WL 104132 (11th Cir. Jan. 10, 2014).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions