United States: The Evolution Of New York Appellate Practice

Last Updated: September 25 2019
Article by Thomas R. Newman and Steven J. Ahmuty,Jr.

This summer marks the 30th anniversary of our joint authorship of the Appellate Practice column, as well as Thomas Newman's 44th year as its author. At these milestones, we reflect on the evolution of New York appellate practice over the past three decades, focusing on technological advancements and efforts to reduce appellate court backlogs and delays.

Thirty years ago, electronic legal research was still a novelty. Law firms maintained extensive libraries of print-based case reporter volumes and other primary and secondary research materials. Law librarians served as the conduit to these print publications for the legions of associates who scoured them and weekly advance sheets searching for that elusive case in point. Decisions were manually "Shepardized" through Shepard's Citation Service to locate any negative subsequent history. This was an arduous, time-consuming process that ran the risk of incomplete results even for the most skilled researchers.

By the mid-1990s, many lawyers and law firms had transitioned at least partially from print-based materials to electronic legal research via online services such as Lexis and Westlaw, which offered cases, legislation and secondary materials in full-text format on searchable databases. The stand-alone UBIQ terminal, which put the Lexis dial-up service directly on a lawyer's desk, became a status symbol among tech-savvy lawyers. New CD-ROM technology utilizing hypertext search systems briefly gained popularity as legal publishers migrated their print content to the CD-ROM platform. By the late 1990s, however, advances in the World Wide Web spelled the demise of CD-ROM research by giving lawyers access to case law, legislation and secondary materials from jurisdictions all around the world, either through subscriptions to commercial databases such as Lexis and Westlaw, or from a vast array of publicly available websites. Today, court websites accessed via desktop computers, tablets and smartphones provide instant online access to decisions, rules of practice, calendars and archives of live-streamed oral arguments. The impact of these advancements on appellate practice has been immeasurable in terms of speed, accuracy and range of available information, although "information overload" has become a common complaint among lawyers.

Three decades ago, the IBM Wheelwriter was the pinnacle of stand-alone typing and word processing technology. Multiple drafts of a brief, especially revisions late into the night, were sure to provoke the ire of the typing pool. Typewritten briefs were typically sent to an appellate printer for type setting followed by hand delivery to the court, a process that took several days. With the evolution and proliferation of personal computers and printer technology in the late 1990s, word processing software gradually replaced the traditional electric typewriter as the sole means of document production. This was augmented by computer networks incorporating document management software and intranets that enabled lawyers and clients to collaborate on briefs. Once computer-generated briefs became the norm, digital printing replaced type setting and is still used today in courts that permit briefs and record materials in paper format.

Ironically, although lawyers, judges and their staffs have long had access to sophisticated electronic legal research databases and platforms, until recently they were still constrained to read copies of briefs and record materials the old fashioned way in paper format. The standard way of checking a record cite in a brief was to manually leaf through the bound pages of the record on appeal or appendix until the cited page was found.

This changed in the Appellate Division on Sept. 17, 2018 with the implementation of the statewide Practice Rules of the Appellate Division (22 NYCRR Part 1250), which, in certain cases, require electronic filing of digital copies (searchable PDFs) of briefs and of record materials in addition to copies of those documents in paper format (see Rule 1250.9). Under the Electronic Filing Rules of the Appellate Division (22 NYCRR Part 1245), digital briefs must contain bookmarks linking the tables of contents of briefs and records to the corresponding page of the document (see Rule 1245.5[f]). The Second Department further requires that cited authorities in briefs and motions must be hyperlinked to a PDF of the cited authority, which must be attached to the digital copy of the brief. See Technical Guidelines of the Second Department. Clicking on a hyperlinked case citation brings one instantly to the decision itself. The Court of Appeals similarly requires the submission of briefs and record material in digital format as companions to the required number of copies of printed briefs and record materials filed. See Rule 500.2. Today, the entirety of a massive multi-volume appellate record can be accessed via the Internet or stored on a tablet for access anywhere in the world.

The improvements in efficiency and productivity attributable to technological advancements will grow with each breakthrough. For example, is there a role in the future for artificial intelligence (AI) in appellate practice? AI-based systems are already in use for legal research, document review, contract analysis, and outcome prediction such as ranges of settlements and verdicts on similar facts. Will appellate courts use AI in the future to assist in deciding selected non-complex appeals—for example, the sufficiency of the allegations in a complaint to state a garden-variety cause of action—by analyzing facts and applying law, subject to the oversight of and final approval by appellate judges? While AI probably will never replace the creativity, judgment and experience of appellate lawyers and judges, it will likely play some role in appellate practice and process in the future.

Reduction of Case Delays and Backlogs

We cannot stress enough that the justices of the Appellate Division and judges of the Court of Appeals, and the non-judicial staff who support them, are extremely hard-working and firmly committed to the just and expeditious resolution of all matters. These courts have taken multiple steps to reduce case delays and backlogs caused by the explosion of civil litigation over the past three decades. Only a few of these initiatives are mentioned here.

Years ago, every appeal in the Court of Appeals was decided with full briefing and oral argument. In 1980, in order to expedite its proceedings and dispositions, the court promulgated Rule 500.4 (now Rule 500.11) of its Rules of Practice, which employs an alternative track of sua sponte merits (SSM) treatment of selected appeals, on the court's own motion, for expedited review without full briefing or oral argument. Such appeals are determined on the record, briefs and decisions filed in the court below, supplemented by counsels' letter submissions on the merits. Rule 500.11(b) states that an appeal may be selected for SSM review based upon (1) questions subject to a limited scope of review; (2) recent, controlling precedent; (3) narrow issues of law not of statewide importance; (4) unpreserved issues of law; (5) a party's request for such review; or (6) other appropriate factors. Of the 136 civil and criminal appeals decided in 2018 on the normal course or on the SSM procedure, 32 (23.5%) were decided upon SSM review. Twenty-one were civil matters and 11 were criminal matters. See 2018 Annual Report of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals [2018 Annual Report], p.4.

Prior to 1985, CPLR 5601(a) authorized an appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals from a final order of the Appellate Division that was one of reversal or modification or was rendered over a single dissent. In order to ease the burden of the court's sizable caseload, the 1985 amendment to CPLR 5601(a) completely eliminated any appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals on the basis of a reversal or modification and adopted more stringent requirements for an appeal as of right on the basis of a dissent (i.e., now requiring "a dissent by at least two justices on a question of law in favor of the party taking such appeal"). This significant limitation on the court's jurisdiction concomitantly reduced its caseload by largely transforming the court into a certiorari court in which the jurisdictional predicate for the majority of its cases is permission to appeal granted by the Appellate Division or Court of Appeals. In 2018, for example, the "permission to appeal" jurisdictional predicate accounted for 73% of the court's civil appeals. See 2018 Annual Report, Appendix 5.

Unlike the Court of Appeals, "finality" is not a jurisdictional requirement in the Appellate Division. Almost every type of non-final order is immediately appealable to the Appellate Division as of right, the only qualification being that it "involves some part of the merits" or "affects a substantial right." See CPLR 5701[a][2][iv-v]. Barring legislative curtailment of the Appellate Division's civil jurisdiction, a drastic step, the growth of appellate caseloads will continue to be an unfortunate byproduct of New York's liberality in allowing interlocutory appeals. This problem is particularly acute in the Second Department, where major population growth over the past three decades in the counties comprising the Second Department has caused a dramatic increase in the volume of civil litigation and associated appeals. In 2018, for example, the Second Department had a larger civil caseload than the other three departments combined, measured both by records on appeal filed and by total dispositions. See The New York State Unified Court System, 2018 Annual Report, p. 38, Table 2. Indeed, in 2018 the Second Department accounted for 65% of the total civil dispositions in the Appellate Division. Id.

By last year, it could take as long as 18 months for a perfected civil appeal to be calendared for oral argument in the Second Department and then additional time for the decision. See Alan D. Scheinkman, 2nd Department Is Changing the Way It Operates to Reduce Backlogs, NYLJ (Sept. 4, 2018). To address this backlog, Presiding Justice Scheinkman introduced several initiatives, including an increase in cases on the day calendars for oral arguments, mandatory mediation in perfected cases, and reduction of the number and length of extensions, as well as the number of motions for extensions. Id. In a similar effort to improve judicial efficiency, the First Department has reduced its panels from five to four justices. See First Department Introduces Four-Judge Panels, Upsetting NY Bar Associations, NYLJ (March 5, 2019); see also Alan D. Scheinkman, Finding the Perfect Number: Part Two, NYLJ (Aug. 27, 2019). In the meantime, various proposals over the past three decades to amend the state Constitution to permit the Legislature to establish a Fifth Department of the Appellate Division on Long Island, splitting up the Second Department to alleviate its imbalanced case load, have failed to gain traction due to unresolved political issues. Undoubtedly, we have not heard the last of the possible creation of a Fifth Department to better balance the caseloads across the Appellate Division.

Thirty years ago, when courts and lawyers had more time at their disposal, there were fewer if any restrictions on the size of briefs and the time allowed for oral argument. Today, arguments, whether written or oral, are circumscribed by word and time limitations imposed by the courts. Initially, the Appellate Division instituted page limitations for briefs, but with advances in word processing software that could cram more and more text onto a single page through the use of condensed typefaces and font spacing, the Appellate Division substituted word limitations, currently 14,000 words for principal briefs and 7,000 words for reply and amicus briefs. See 22 NYCRR 1250.8[f][2]. The limitations on argument time developed as a consequence of the "hot bench," in which the court's familiarity with the facts and legal issues is presumed, and the need to increase the number of cases on the calendars to address the backlog issue. While the Court of Appeals and four Departments of the Appellate Division ostensibly allow 30 minutes and 15 minutes per side for argument, respectively, in practice counsel are typically allotted 10 or 15 minutes in the Court of Appeals, and in the First and Second Departments the time is often cut down to 7 or 8 minutes on the call of the calendar. While some lawyers grouse about these word and time limitations, they undoubtedly have the salutary effect of forcing appellate advocates to select the strongest issues and arguments for the briefs and oral argument, write a brief that focuses on what matters to appellate judges, and present an oral argument in a way that succinctly and directly addresses the court's concerns regarding the position advanced by the advocate. This is part of the unique skill set of successful appellate practitioners.

Originally published by New York Law Journal.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions