United States: Decision By D.C. Judge Deepens Mystery Of OCC Fintech Charter's Legal Status

Last Updated: September 19 2019
Article by Dustin N. Nofziger

As it has been well-reported, including in this blog, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced an intention to allow FinTech companies to apply for special purpose national bank (SPNB) charters on July 31, 2018. This led to parallel legal challenges being filed by the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Earlier this year, the OCC filed motions to dismiss in each case, arguing that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the OCC's actions and that the cases were not yet ripe. In May and September 2019, the respective district courts reached differing conclusions on these motions to dismiss. The New York district court denied the OCC's motion to dismiss in May, thereby allowing DFS's lawsuit to proceed, while last week the D.C. district court granted the OCC's motion to dismiss.

By way of background, the merits issue in these cases is whether the OCC exceeded its authority under the National Bank Act (NBA) by promulgating a 2003 regulation, 12 C.F.R. § 5.20(e)(1)(i), that provides that the OCC may charter SPNBs that "conduct at least one of the following three core banking functions: Receiving deposits; paying checks; or lending money." DFS and CSBS contend that the regulation exceeds the OCC's authority to the extent that it would allow the OCC to charter FinTech companies as SPNBs that do not receive deposits (e.g., to charter money transmitters as SPNBs). The OCC, meanwhile contends that the NBA's use of the term "business of banking" is ambiguous, and that the OCC's interpretation of that ambiguous term set forth in its regulation is entitled to Chevron deference from the courts.

Denial of OCC Motion to Dismiss DFS Lawsuit

In May 2019, the New York district court denied the OCC's motion to dismiss the action brought by DFS. On the issue of standing, the court held that DFS had adequately alleged that it was subject to an imminent invasion of a legally protected interest for two reasons. First, New York consumers would lose the protections that New York law and DFS oversight provide if FinTech businesses were able to obtain SPNB charters, thereby availing themselves of the federal preemption of New York law. Second, DFS would suffer direct economic harm due to lost revenues from assessments that DFS would otherwise levy on FinTech companies licensed by DFS if those companies were instead chartered by the OCC as SPNBs. On the issue of ripeness, the court held that DFS's claims were ripe, meaning that the court would not exercise its discretion to decline to exercise jurisdiction because the case would be better decided later. While no FinTech company has yet applied for a SPNB charter, in the court's view the OCC had taken sufficient steps towards the issuance of SPNB charters for FinTechs, for example by announcing its intention on July 31, 2018 to "accept[] applications for national bank charters from nondepository financial technology (fintech) companies," for the court to hear the case.

In the context of considering whether DFS had failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under Federal of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), the New York court also considered the merits of DFS's lawsuit. In so doing, it found that Chevron deference to the OCC's interpretation of the term "business of banking" in the NBA was not warranted because the term "unambiguously requires receiving deposits as an aspect of the business." This conclusion was largely based on the New York court's reading of Civil War-era dictionary definitions of "banking" and "bank" that mentioned deposit-taking; a law review article regarding the purpose of the NBA that discussed deposit-taking; and two Congressional amendments to the NBA enacted more than 100 years after the original enactment of the NBA that the court felt suggested that subsequent Congresses understood the term "business of banking" in the NBA to require deposit-taking.  

Dismissal of CSBS Lawsuit

In contrast to the New York district court, the D.C. district court dismissed CSBS's lawsuit on the grounds that CSBS lacked standing and that its claims were unripe. According to the D.C. court, CSBS lacked associational standing because it had failed to plead an actual or imminent harm to any of its state regulator members (e.g., DFS). The D.C. court found it significant that not a single FinTech had applied for a SPNB charter in the 16 years since the OCC's promulgation of 12 C.F.R. § 5.20(e)(1)(i), and it held that CSBS had failed to allege in its complaint that any particular CSBS member would suffer any actual or imminent harm. In terms of ripeness, the D.C. court held that the dispute would be sharpened if the OCC chartered a particular FinTech – or decided to imminently charter a particular FinTech. (In a prior decision granting a prior OCC motion to dismiss a prior CSBS complaint, the D.C. court had noted that CSBS's prior complaint stated that the term "Fin[T]ech" can encompass an "almost unimaginably wide variety of services," and had opined that "[c]ourts are ill-equipped to prospectively draw lines as to which hypothetical Fin[T]echs, if any, may be chartered.") Unlike the New York court, the D.C. court did not reach the merits issues.

Where Do Things Go from Here?

CSBS may appeal the dismissal of its lawsuit by the D.C. district court or, alternatively, it may seek to refile its lawsuit once additional evidence has accumulated that its claims are "ripe" (e.g., once an application for a SPNB charter has been filed by a nondepository Fintech). The DFS lawsuit, on the other hand, has been cleared by the New York district court to move forward to summary judgment and, potentially, to trial. Given the New York court's substantial foray into the merits, however, the OCC and DFS currently are working together to craft a proposed final judgment, that, once accepted by the New York court, would be appealable to the Second Circuit. While this process is pending, the OCC has received multiple extensions from the district court of its deadline to answer DFS's complaint. The OCC's deadline to answer the complaint is currently set for September 30, 2019, although it may be again extended if the parties need additional time to confer on the proposed final judgment.  

Somewhat ironically – given the D.C. district court's holding that the CSBS case was not yet ripe in part due to the lack of an extant application by a FinTech for a SPNB charter – it seems unlikely that any FinTech company will apply for a SPNB charter until there is greater certainty about the charter's legality. In the absence of a Supreme Court or perhaps appellate court decision upholding the charter as legal, any non-depository FinTech that applies for a SPNB risks the charter being attacked by one or more state regulators and/or CSBS.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions