ARTICLE
4 September 2019

Practical Considerations For America Invents Act Trial Strategies

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
Since their inception in 2012, more than 9,600 AIA trials have been filed. The Federal Circuit has decided over 420 appeals stemming
United States Intellectual Property

Since their inception in 2012, more than 9,600 AIA trials have been filed. The Federal Circuit has decided over 420 appeals stemming from Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) AIA trial decisions. The Supreme Court has also considered several AIA trial practices. The growth of this niche area of practice stems from the appeal of parallel litigations before both federal district courts and the PTAB, which allow the PTAB to consider invalidity issues. It is common practice for defendants accused of patent infringement to also pursue validity challenges before the PTAB.

In this article, Finnegan attorney Kara Specht discusses how recent changes in case law and rules related to America Invents Act trial proceedings require approaching trial strategy in new ways. Read the full article here.

Originally Publish by For the Defense

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More