ARTICLE
22 August 2019

CFPB Proposes Settlement In Connection With High-Interest Credit Offers

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The CFPB and the State of Arkansas proposed a settlement in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, against brokers for violations of the Consumer Financial
United States Finance and Banking

The CFPB and the State of Arkansas proposed a settlement in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, against brokers for violations of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 and the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The violations were related to misrepresentations of high-interest credit offers.

According to the CFPB, Andrew Gamber, and several entities he operated, made high-interest offers on credit to consumers and, in particular, to disabled veterans. The CFPB found that Mr. Gamber falsely claimed that (i) the offered product was a sale of payments when it was actually a high-interest credit offer, and (ii) consumers would receive funds during a specified timeframe. In addition, the CFPB stated that Mr. Gamber did not inform consumers of the interest rate on the credit offer.

Under the CFPB's proposed settlement, Mr. Gamber and his companies would be permanently banned from engaging in any activity in relation to brokering agreements between pension recipients and third parties. The CFPB also imposed (i) a $2.7 million judgment of redress, (ii) a $1 civil money penalty to the CFPB, and (iii) $75,000 to the Arkansas Attorney General's Consumer Education and Enforcement Fund instead of a civil money penalty to the State of Arkansas. However, the CFPB stated that if Mr. Gamber pays $200,000 in consumer redress, the $1 civil money penalty to the CFPB and $75,000 to the State of Arkansas, then the CFPB will suspend the full payment of the $2.7 million judgment for redress.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More