ARTICLE
13 August 2019

The European Courts Recognize Creditors' Interests In State Aid Decisions

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
This may now provide a plausible route for creditors to attack State aid approvals of bank resolution, something that has been very difficult to date.
European Union Finance and Banking

In this article we examine a recent landmark case where the European Court of Justice recognized that if a creditor challenges a national banking resolution process on the grounds that it has suffered damage, it should also have legal standing to bring a case against the relevant State aid decision as these processes are inextricably linked.

This may now provide a plausible route for creditors to attack State aid approvals of bank resolution, something that has been very difficult to date — despite the extraordinary damage that such decisions do to creditors.

Read this chapter in Shearman & Sterling's 2019 Antitrust Annual Report, "The European Courts Recognize Creditors' Interests in State Aid Decisions."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More