United States: A Deepening Divide: Fifth Circuit Adds To Split Regarding Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Over Social Security Claims

Bankruptcy court jurisdiction over Medicare issues is increasingly important given the distressed state of the health care industry and skyrocketing level of bankruptcy filings by health care providers. On May 10, 2019, in Benjamin v. United States (In re Benjamin), 1 the Fifth Circuit rejected the argument that the "recodification canon" deprives bankruptcy courts of the requisite subject-matter jurisdiction to hear Social Security claims, bolstering the minority view previously articulated by only the Ninth Circuit 2 regarding whether Section 405(h) of Title 42 (the "Medicare Act") bars bankruptcy courts from adjudicating Social Security and/or Medicare disputes. Benjamin involved a specific inquiry into whether 42 U.S.C. § 405(h) divests bankruptcy courts of the jurisdiction to hear Social Security claims. As bankruptcy court jurisdiction over Medicare claims is derived from the same statute, the Fifth Circuit's decision will likely have further significant implications.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) determined that the debtor in Benjamin received an overpayment of Social Security benefits, thus entitling the SSA to recoup the overpayment from him by withholding some future Social Security benefits. 3 The SSA denied the debtor's request for waiver, and he properly appealed to an administrative law judge. 4 Before the appeal was decided, the debtor filed for bankruptcy under chapter 7 in May 2017 and initiated an adversary proceeding against the SSA. The debtor alleged that the SSA improperly recouped his benefits and sought recovery of the withheld amounts. 5 The SSA moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, arguing that the debtor must first exhaust the administrative appeal process, or alternatively, for failure to state a claim. 6 The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's dismissal on jurisdictional grounds, resulting in the debtor's appeal to the Fifth Circuit. 7

The sole issue before the Fifth Circuit was whether the bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to hear the debtor's claims. 8 In pertinent part, 42 U.S.C. § 405(h) states:

No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as [provided in § 405(g)]. No action against the United States, the Commissioner of Social Security, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 or 1346 of Title 28 to recover on any claim arising under [Title II of the Social Security Act]. 9

As the court explained, the third sentence of § 405(h) "strips district courts of the most obvious sources of federal jurisdiction for any claims arising under Title II of the Social Security Act." 10 The second sentence "then channels a certain class of those claims into § 405(g), which . . . grants jurisdiction to district courts to review final agency decisions made after a hearing." 11 Finding, however, that the bankruptcy court was not barred from relying on its general grant of jurisdiction in 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) to hear the debtor's claims, the Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded for a more detailed determination of whether, notwithstanding jurisdiction under § 1334, those claims are channeled by § 405(h)'s second sentence into § 405(g): "If they are, then the [bankruptcy] court must determine if jurisdiction under § 405(g) exists. But if not, then the bankruptcy court has jurisdiction under § 1334 to hear Benjamin's claims." 12

The Fifth Circuit's Analysis

The debtor advocated for plain reading of § 405(h) — i.e., as a bar of jurisdiction under §§ 1331 and 1346, but not § 1334. 13 The SSA argued for the adoption of the approach of the Third, Seventh, Eighth and Eleventh Circuits: a bar of § 1334 jurisdiction as well, despite it not being listed in the statutory text. 14 The court reviewed several decisions of its sister circuits, among them the Seventh Circuit's Bodimetric Health Services Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty, the first to find that § 405(h)'s third sentence included a hidden jurisdictional bar. 15

As originally enacted in 1939, § 405(h) barred federal courts of jurisdiction over all actions brought under 28 U.S.C. § 41, which at the time contained virtually all jurisdictional grants to federal courts, "now scattered throughout Title 28." 16 In 1984, Congress recodified and revised § 405(h) to its current form, which on its face deprives federal courts of jurisdiction over Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid disputes under §§ 1331 and 1346 only. 17 The codification revision was labeled in the relevant act as part of a litany of "Technical Corrections," and Congress instructed that none of the technical changes "shall be construed as changing or affecting any right, liability, status, or interpretation which existed (under the provisions of law involved) before [the amendments' effective] date." 18

In Bodimetric, the Seventh Circuit found that this language "clearly expressed Congress's 'intent not to alter the substantive scope of section 405(h). Because the previous version of section 405(h) precluded judicial review of diversity actions, so too must newly revised section 405(h) bar these actions.'" 19 More recently, the Eleventh Circuit expanded upon this body of case law and held that § 405(h) specifically barred jurisdiction under § 1334 — reasoning that "the 1984 amendments to section 405(h) were a codification and not a substantive change." 20 The Eleventh Circuit's conclusion was based on the recodification canon: When legislatures codify the law, courts should presume that no substantive change was intended absent a clear indication otherwise. 21

Acknowledging the recodification canon's usefulness in certain instances, the Fifth Circuit found it applicable only "in the absence of a clear indication from Congress that it intended to change the law's substance." 22 Finding the "most obvious source of congressional intent" to be the clear statutory text, the court rejected the notion of a hidden jurisdictional bar in § 405(h). "[Section 405(h)] mean[s] what it says. And it says nothing about section 1334." 23Finding that the recodification canon cannot be used to "trump clear text" that is otherwise unambiguous, the Fifth Circuit applied the plain meaning of § 405(h) — "a meaning that, everyone agrees, does not bar § 1334 jurisdiction." 24

The court's inquiry did not end there. Noting that per another sentence of § 405(h) 25 § 405(g) only comes into play where a would-be plaintiff is challenging (1) a disability determination (2) for which the statute requires a hearing, the court remanded the case and instructed the bankruptcy court to determine whether the debtor's claims "are channeled by section 405(h)'s second sentence into section 405(g)." 26 If so, the bankruptcy court must determine whether it has jurisdiction over the debtor's claims under § 405(g). 27

Benjamin highlights a circuit split of critical significance to those dealing with the insolvency of health care providers. Often, Medicare and Medicaid issues are inextricably entwined with other factors leading to a bankruptcy filing. If bankruptcy courts do not have the jurisdiction to decide reoccurring issues in health care bankruptcies — such as disputes over Medicare reimbursements — then the utility of having a single forum to address issues is severely affected. Until the Supreme Court weighs in on the recodification canon, this area will remain unsettled.


1 No. 18-20185, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14071 (5th Cir. May 10, 2019).

2 Sullivan v. Town & Country Home Nursing Servs. Inc. (In re Town & Country Home Nursing Servs. Inc.), 963 F.2d 1146, 1155 (9th Cir. 1991).

3 Benjamin, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14071, at *2.

4 Id. at *2–3. This appeal remained pending as of the date of the Fifth Circuit's opinion.

5 Id. at *3.

6 Id.

7 Id. at *3–4.

8 Id.

9 42 U.S.C. § 405(h) (2012); see Benjamin, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14071, at *4.

10 Benjamin, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 14071, at *5.

11 Id.

12 Id. at *18–19.

13 Id. at *5.

14 Id. at *5–6. Help Center

15 Id. at *6 (citing Bodimetric, 903 F.2d 480, 488–90 (7th Cir. 1990)). Bodimetric evaluated whether § 405(h) stripped courts of their 28 U.S.C. § 1332 diversity jurisdiction to hear claims arising under the Medicare Act.

16 Benjamin, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS, at *6 (citations omitted).

17 Id. (citations omitted).

18 Id. at *6–7 (citations omitted).

19 Id. at *7; Bodimetric, 903 F.2d at 489. The Third and Eighth Circuits adopted the Bodimetric reasoning to reach the same conclusions. See Nichole Med. Equip. & Supply, Inc. v. TriCenturion Inc., 694 F.3d 340, 346–47 (3d Cir. 2012); Midland Psychiatric Assocs. Inc. v. United States, 145 F.3d 1000, 1004 (8th Cir. 1998).

20 Fla. Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Bayou Shores SNF LLC (In re Bayou Shores SNF LLC), 828 F.3d 1297, 1314 (11th Cir. 2016).

21 Benjamin, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS, at *7 (citing Bayou Shores, 828 F.3d at 1314).

22 Id. at *8–9.

23 Id. *8–9, *15 (citations omitted). The court also cited Justice Scalia: "The new text is the law, and where it clearly makes a change, that governs. This is so even when the legislative history . . . expresses the intent to make no change." Id. at *9 (quoting A. Scalia & B. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 257 (2012)).

24 Id. at *8, *10.

25 Id. at *16; see 42 U.S.C. § 405(h) (2012) ("No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as [provided in § 405(g).]").

26 Benjamin, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS, at *17–19.

27 Id. at *19.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions