United States: Supreme Court Holds That Disparate-Treatment Discrimination Must Be Based Upon Strong Basis In Evidence Of Potential Liability For Disparate Impact Discrimination

In Ricci v. DeStefano, decided on June 29, 2009, the Supreme Court ruled that "race-based action like the City's in this case is impermissible under Title VII unless the employer can demonstrate a strong basis in evidence that, had it not taken the action, it would have been liable under the disparate-impact statute." Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion for a 5-4 majority including Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. Justice Ginsberg filed a dissenting opinion joined by Justices Stevens, Souter, and Breyer. Justices Scalia and Alito also filed concurring opinions. Because its ruling is grounded on Title VII, the case has significance for all employers in both the private and government sectors.

In 2003, the City of New Haven, Connecticut ("the City") administered examinations in an effort to promote qualified applicants to fill vacant lieutenant and captain positions in its Fire Department. When they analyzed the test results, City officials found that the pass rate for black candidates was approximately half the pass rate of white candidates. Because of the limited number of vacant positions and promotion criteria, no black candidates would receive one of the 19 possible promotions. Based on concerns about being sued by black candidates who would not have been promoted, the City did not certify the exams, and no firefighters of any race received promotions.

Under existing law, employees may sue employers under Title VII under a "disparate treatment" theory alleging that the employer intentionally discriminated on the basis of race, or under a "disparate impact" theory alleging that a facially neutral practice that has the effect of disproportionately excluding members of a racial group. For example, previous Supreme Court cases have held that employers may be liable under the "disparate impact" theory if they use tests that produce a substantial and significant adverse effect on a specific racial group. Also, the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution provides individuals of all races "the equal protection of the law," and courts strictly scrutinize any government action that is based on racial classifications.

The plaintiffs were firefighters who would have received promotions but for the city's refusal to certify the test results. The plaintiffs argued that the City engaged in disparate treatment based on the plaintiffs' race, arguing that the scores were not certified because the higher scoring candidates were not black, in violation of both Title VII and the Equal Protection Clause. The City argued in the lower courts that its decision to not certify the exam results was not based on race, but instead was motivated by the City's goal to avoid a Title VII disparate impact lawsuit from African-Americans who might allege that they had been denied promotions based on a test that had disparate impact.

The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the City. A three judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which included Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor, affirmed without extensive analysis. The plaintiffs sought rehearing before the full Second Circuit, which was denied in a 7-6 vote over a strong dissenting opinion.

Justice Kennedy's opinion was based on Title VII, thereby avoiding the constitutional Equal Protection argument, and framed the issue as follows:

We consider, therefore, whether the purpose to avoid disparate-impact liability excuses what otherwise would be prohibited disparate-treatment discrimination.... Our task is to provide guidance to employers and courts for situations when these two prohibitions could be in conflict absent a rule to reconcile them. In providing this guidance our decision must be consistent with the important purpose of Title VII—that the workplace be an environment free of discrimination, where race is not a barrier to opportunity.

Justice Kennedy rejected bright-line standards urged by the firefighters that "it cannot be permissible for an employer to take race-based adverse employment actions in order to avoid disparate-impact liability," and that "an employer in fact must be in violation of the disparate-impact provision before it can use compliance as a defense in a disparate-treatment suit," stating that these standards are "overly simplistic and too restrictive of Title VII's purposes." Rather, Justice Kennedy noted that in previous affirmative action cases, the Court had held that "certain government actions to remedy past racial discrimination—actions that are themselves based on race—are constitutional only where there is a 'strong basis in evidence' that the remedial actions were necessary. Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 500 (1989) (quoting Wygant, supra, at 277 (plurality opinion)." Justice Kennedy justified use of this standard as follows:

Applying the strong-basis-in-evidence standard to Title VII gives effect to both the disparate-treatment and disparate-impact provisions, allowing violations of one in the name of compliance with the other only in certain, narrow circumstances. The standard leaves ample room for employers' voluntary compliance efforts, which are essential to the statutory scheme and to Congress' efforts to eradicate workplace discrimination.... [B]ut it is not so restrictive that it allows employers to act only when there is a provable, actual violation.

Reversing the judgment of the District Court, and finding that the firefighters were entitled to summary judgment in their favor, Justice Kennedy stated that the racially adverse impact of the test results was significant and "that the City was faced with a prima facie case of disparate-impact liability." However, Justice Kennedy then stated that a prima facie case of disparate-impact liability was "far from a strong basis in evidence" because the City could be liable only if the examinations were not job-related or consistent with business necessity, or if the City refused to adopt equally-valid, less-discriminatory alternatives. Justice Kennedy found that there was no genuine dispute that the examinations were job-related and consistent with business necessity, and that "[t]he City, moreover, turned a blind eye to evidence that supported the exams' validity." Accordingly, Justice Kennedy concluded as follows:

[T]here is no genuine dispute that the City lacks a strong basis in evidence to believe it would face disparate-impact liability if it certified the examination results.... Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examination and qualified for promotions.

In dissent, Justice Ginsburg emphasized the historical legacy of race discrimination in the firefighting profession, and argued that the lower court's decision should have been affirmed.

The outcome of this case provides guidance for both private and public employers about how to permissibly achieve racial diversity in the workplace while avoiding lawsuits. First, any employment testing should be carefully validated to avoid disproportionate impact on protected categories of employees. Second, employers should carefully examine test results for clear bias in favor of one racial group, and thoroughly investigate whether other available practices that serve their job-related evaluation purposes have less impact on a protected class. However, Justice Kennedy's opinion makes clear that mere fear of litigation, without a deeper analysis as to potential liability for disparate-impact discrimination, is not sufficient to engage in race-based workplace decisions.

In addition, while Ricci v. DeStefano involved promotions, the logic of the opinion is equally applicable to other employment decisions including hiring and termination practices. The clear message from the Supreme Court is that employers must tread carefully when considering race-based actions as a means of avoiding potential disparate-impact liability.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions