Regulatory Spring: Rulemaking By The Wage & Hour Division - June 21, 2019

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Last week, the comment period ended for the Department of Labor's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking to revise and update the regulations interpreting the Fair Labor Standards Act's
United States Employment and HR

Last week, the comment period ended for the Department of Labor’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking to revise and update the regulations interpreting the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (“FLSA”) regular rate of pay requirements.  Our Firm submitted comments, which can be found here.  In those comments, we:

  • Supported the Department’s proposal to treat vacation, sick, and other forms of paid time off similarly for the purposes of determining whether “cashed out” leave must be included in the regular rate. 
  • Agreed with the Department’s efforts to eliminate confusion over whether meal periods are properly excluded from the regular rate.
  • Noted that the Department’s proposal to align the exclusion of reimbursable expenses from the regular rate with the broader language and intent of the FLSA would also provide needed clarity to employers in states such as Illinois and California, which require reimbursement of expenses.
  • Requested that the Department provide further clarity on the types of “other similar payments” that can be excluded from the regular rate, such as employee wellness programs and fitness memberships, tuition benefits, sign-on bonuses, and employee discounts.
  • Supported the Department’s proposal to exclude state-law required show-up pay and call-back pay, as well as similar payments, from the regular rate.
  • Welcomed the Department’s clarification of the types of bonuses that can be excluded from the regular rate as discretionary.
  • Requested that the Department clarify its position with respect to the inclusion of certain benefits-type payments.
  • Proposed additional examples to support the Department’s clarification of how the regular rate should be calculated when an employer uses more than one method of payment (e.g., day rates and piece rates).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More