ARTICLE
19 June 2019

Location, Location, Location. Washington Federal Court Looks To Where Benefit Plan Was Signed And Negotiated In Agreeing To Transfer ERISA Class Action To Georgia

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
Much like buying a home, location can mean everything when defending a class action. Therefore, it is common for defendants to try and transfer class actions to what is viewed as a more favorable
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Much like buying a home, location can mean everything when defending a class action. Therefore, it is common for defendants to try and transfer class actions to what is viewed as a more favorable jurisdiction when there is at least a significant connection with that forum. When this happens, courts apply a largely predictable set of factors and considerations in deciding the motion. Perhaps it should come as no surprise that these factors become a little less intuitive when trying to transfer an ERISA class action, at least according to the recent decision in Mayfield v. ACE American Ins. Co., 18-cv-1695 (W.D. Wash. May 13, 2019).

In Mayfield, the plaintiff was a participant in his employer's welfare benefit plan, which included accidental death and dismemberment ("AD&D") insurance. ACE insured the plan's AD&D benefit. The plaintiff filed a putative ERISA class action lawsuit against ACE in the Western District of Washington, claiming he and others did not receive full insurance proceeds upon the death of covered individuals. ACE moved to transfer the case to the Northern District of Georgia, originally arguing that Georgia was a more convenient forum because more putative class members were in Georgia than Washington, the plan was administered in Georgia, and ACE had some employees with knowledge of the case in Georgia. On reply, ACE submitted additional facts and evidence showing that the plan was negotiated and executed in Georgia.

The court agreed with ACE and transferred the case to the Northern District of Georgia. The court found that the plaintiff's choice of forum was of minimal importance because it was a putative class action. Interestingly, the court seemed to give considerable weight to the fact that the plan was negotiated and executed in Georgia, finding this was a "considerable technical connection" to that forum. The court also found that litigation and travel costs would be reduced by having the case in Georgia rather than Washington.

The bottom line: When seeking to transfer an ERISA class action, don't forget to check where the at-issue plan was negotiated and executed. It may be the boost you need to get your motion granted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More