United States: Jay-Z Thrusts SEC Subpoena Enforcement Into The Spotlight: A Look At Recent Trends And Considerations


If you have 99 problems, you should make sure that a Securities and Exchange Commission subpoena enforcement action

is not one. On 3rd May, 2018, the SEC announced that it was seeking an order requiring Shawn Carter, better known as Jay-Z, to comply with a subpoena to testify in an ongoing investigation.1 The SEC staff uses subpoena enforcement actions to obtain the information they deem necessary to an investigation, as well as to vindicate their subpoena authority as a matter of principle. The SEC's public announcements of such actions — through press releases — are likely designed to deter parties that might consider non-compliance as well as to show the public that the SEC is vigilant about asserting its authority. But the SEC does not always enforce subpoenas in instances of non-compliance and, when it does, it does not always announce subpoena enforcement actions; indeed, in the past it rarely did. The SEC's public announcement regarding the Jay-Z subpoena enforcement action is reflective of a more recent trend to publicise these actions and appears to have obtained the desired effect of compliance with the subpoena. Given the fame of the subject, the SEC also succeeded in receiving broad coverage of its message of deterrence after the press picked up on the news of the enforcement action. But what lessons does this recent trend hold for those of us less accustomed to the spotlight? This paper explores recent trends in the issuance and enforcement of SEC subpoenas, including the increase in enforcement action publicity, and discusses considerations when choosing between complying with a subpoena and, alternatively, facing a subpoena enforcement action.


To compel someone to provide documentary and testimonial evidence in an investigation, the Commission must first authorise its staff to issue subpoenas by entering a formal order of investigation. A formal order of investigation generally outlines the scope of the investigation that the Commission has authorised. It typically recites publicly available information about the people or entities involved in the investigation, identifies and quotes the relevant statutes and rules that might have been violated, and designates the staff members who are authorised to administer oaths and issue subpoenas.2

The federal securities laws give the SEC nationwide authority to issue a subpoena to compel the provision of documents or testimony. 3 A subpoena may be issued requiring the production of any records 'deemed relevant or material to the inquiry', according to the SEC Enforcement Manual, 4 which also provides that a subpoena should not be used to conduct discovery in a pending litigation. 5 According to established case law, the staff has substantial discretion to determine the scope of an investigation as well as the scope of a subpoena. 6 To enforce the subpoena, the SEC is not required to show that the subpoenaed documents are actually relevant to an investigation. All that is required is a good reason to investigate and a showing of a 'reasonable belief' that the records sought are relevant to the investigation, which means that anything that touches a matter under investigation is fair game to compel. 7

An SEC subpoena is not self-enforcing; the Commission must file an action in federal court to enforce it.8 In actions filed to enforce subpoenas, federal courts have almost always ruled in favour of the SEC; however, the very process required at the SEC to obtain approval of a subpoena enforcement action might affect the decision to bring such an action, since this process inevitably delays the investigation. First, the decision to enforce a subpoena — let alone actually take action — does not occur the minute a subpoena recipient fails to satisfy a due date. The parties often negotiate further deadlines and the staff typically gives the subpoenaed party several chances to comply. The staff may also take time to internally deliberate the strength of a subpoena enforcement action, the necessity of the documents being sought and the potential harm to the enforcement programme should the staff permit the dereliction to go unaddressed.9 This part of the delay, that is, the interval between the SEC's issuance of a subpoena and filing an enforcement action, is often about three months, based on our review of the procedural facts recited by the courts in a sampling of 15 decisions ordering subpoena enforcement over the last 18 years. And the process weeds out those potential actions with a lower possibility of success, given possible defects in the subpoena.

In 2009, the SEC attempted to streamline the subpoena enforcement process. Historically, approval to file subpoena enforcement actions had to be granted by the full Commission, as with any action to be filed in federal court. In an effort to be more efficient after the SEC failed to detect Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme in 2008, the Commission delegated authority to issue and enforce subpoenas to the four or five associate directors below the level of division director, instead of requiring the full Commission to approve of such filings. 10 As the statistics recited below demonstrate, 11 that expansion in personnel authorised to commence actions to enforce subpoenas was accompanied by a slight increase in use of that authority in the following years (although probably not to a statistically significant degree). Under the current administration, there appears to have been a slight retrenchment in that authority; at the beginning of 2017, the SEC placed the authority to issue and enforce subpoenas with the directors of the Division of Enforcement rather than with their direct reports.

Moreover, the SEC's enforcement staff cannot rely upon immediate action by a court to enforce the subpoena and enable the staff to keep the investigation moving forward. In cases in which the court has ordered subpoena enforcement (versus those matters in which the court denied the SEC relief or the respondents agreed to respond to the subpoena without a court order), on average the court ordered enforcement of the subpoena about three months after the action was filed, and sometimes the staff has had to wait for up to a year for a court to order compliance.12 The average time between issuing a subpoena and obtaining a court order enforcing it is six months.

A case in point is the subpoena enforcement action filed against Shawn Carter. The SEC commenced the action on 2nd May, 2018, by filing an application for an order to show cause and an order requiring compliance with a subpoena in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The application recites this chronology: the SEC issued the first subpoena to Mr Carter on 16th November, 2017, requiring his appearance for testimony over two months later, on 23rd January, 2018; after he refused to appear on that date, the SEC issued a second subpoena a month later on 23rd February, 2018, seeking his appearance on 21st March, 2018. (The reason for issuing a second subpoena is unclear.) When he again refused to appear, the Commission commenced the subpoena enforcement action six weeks later. At an 8th May hearing, the court ordered Mr Carter to testify on 15th May, and he did testify.13 Thus, the time between issuance of the initial subpoena and the order enforcing it was about six months, although the route to get there was a little different — issuance of two subpoenas, followed by a relatively quick decision to bring enforcement action and swift resolution of the matter by the court. The court's alacrity might have been influenced by the high visibility of Jay-Z and the somewhat unprecedented level of media coverage of the SEC's subpoena enforcement action.

To read the full article click here


(1) SEC v. Shawn Carter, Litigation Release No. 24131, available at: https://www.sec.gov/litigation/ litreleases/2018/lr24131.htm (accessed 5th December, 2018).

(2) Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement: Enforcement Manual (2017) 'Enforcement manual', at 18. SEC Enforcement does not have to use subpoena authority to conduct an investigation. Staff can seek voluntary cooperation, which many established and reputable entities and people will willingly provide. In addition, to compel information from a registered entity, such as a broker-dealer, staff can use the SEC's examination authority.

(3) This is a greater geographical sweep than the subpoena power granted to federal district courts in civil litigation by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Securities Act § 19(b), 15 U.S.C. § 77s(b) (1994 & Supp. 1997); see also Ferrara, R. C. and Khinda, P. S. (1999) 'SEC Enforcement Proceedings: Strategic considerations for when the agency comes calling', (FNaa1), Administrative Law Review, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 1143–1195.

(4) SEC Enforcement Manual, §3.2.6 (28th November, 2017).

(5) Ibid.

(6) 17 C.F.R. § 202.5; Gewerter v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, No. CV-16-02556-PHX-DLR, 2016 WL 4074117, at *2 (D. Ariz. Aug. 1, 2016); Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc. v. S.E.C., 704 F.2d 1065, 1066 (9th Cir. 1983).

(7) Feiner v. U.S. S.E.C., 914 F. Supp. 2d 474, 478 (S.D.N.Y. 2012).

(8) SEC Enforcement Manual, §3.2.8 (28th November, 2017). ('If a person or entity refuses to comply with a subpoena issued by the staff pursuant to a formal order of investigation, the Commission may file a subpoena enforcement action in federal district court, seeking an order compelling compliance. See Section 21(c) of the Exchange Act.')

(9) As one example of these considerations, the staff might conclude that because the investigation is close to completion and their record is sufficient without the subpoenaed documents, investor protection will be better served by bringing a substantive enforcement action without waiting for the results of subpoena enforcement.

(10) Lynch, S. N. (2017) 'SEC's acting chair scales back enforcement unit's subpoena powers', Reuters Business News, 16th February.

(11) See Figure 1.

(12) S.E.C. v. Stilwell, No. 1:14-MC-257 ALC, 2014 WL 4631915, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2014); Matter of Application to Enforce Admin. Subpoenas of the Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Jones, No. CV 13-08314 DDP (EX), 2013 WL 12114776, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2013); S.E.C. v. Nicita, No. CIV 07CV0772WQHAJB, 2008 WL 170010, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2008); Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Andrew Farmer & Iridium Capital, Ltd., Civil Action No. 4:13-Mc-00014-Y (N.D. Tex.), Litigation Release No. 22680 (Apr. 18, 2013); S.E.C. v. Obioha, No. C 12-80109 WHA, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 12, 2012); S.E.C. v. Shanahan, 504 F. Supp. 2d 680, 681 (E.D. Mo. 2007); S.E.C. v. Sears, No. CIV. 05-728-JE, 2005 WL 5885548, at *1 (D. Or. July 28, 2005); S.E.C. v. Caramadre, 717 F.Supp.2d 217, 218 (D. RI. June 10, 2010); U.S. S.E.C. v. LovesLines Overseas Mgmt., Ltd., No. MISC. 04-302RWRAK, 2007 WL 581909, at *1 (D.D.C. Feb. 21, 2007); United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Sandberg, No. 17-MC-62 (JRT/TNL), 2018 WL 987685, at *2 (D. Minn. Feb. 1, 2018); United States Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Gustafson, No. 17-MC-55 (WMW/SER), 2018 WL 1629205, at *2 (D. Minn. Jan. 9, 2018); U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Movant, v. Steve H. Karroum, and FX & BEYOND CORPORATION, Respondents., 2015 WL 11571029 (D.D.C.); S.E.C. v. Finazzo, 543 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), aff'd, 360 F. App'x 169 (2d Cir. 2009); Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Kaplan, 397 F. Supp. 564, 567 (E.D.N.Y. 1975); Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. OKC Corp., 474 F. Supp. 1031, 1034 (N.D. Tex. 1979).

(13) The Associated Press (2018) 'Jay-Z questioned by SEC in New York', Bloomberg Business, 15th May, available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/ articles/2018-05-15/jay-z-questioned-by-sec-innew-york (accessed 5th December, 2018).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
28 Aug 2019, Webinar, San Francisco, United States

This CLE webinar will analyze the potential antitrust ramifications of joint ventures (JVs) and other collaborations between competitors and how to balance the pro-competitive efficiencies against the anti-competitive effects of a proposed JV.

1 Oct 2019, Other, Washington, DC, United States

Orrick is proud to host the AIPN for its final breakfast meeting of 2019 for a session titled “Helping the World Gasify”. As natural gas production and use is very unevenly distributed throughout the world, often gas produced in association with crude oil is sold below cost or flared.

25 Nov 2019, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Lorraine McGowen will be speaking on the upcoming “Evaluating the Financial Health of an Entity” panel at the New York session of the Pocket MBA: Finance for Lawyers and Other Professionals program, hosted by the Practising Law Institute.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions