Fund Manager And CIO Settle SEC Charges For Failure To Properly Value Assets

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A private fund manager and its chief investment officer ("CIO") settled SEC charges for compliance deficiencies that resulted in inaccurate valuations of client assets.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

A private fund manager and its chief investment officer ("CIO") settled SEC charges for compliance deficiencies that resulted in inaccurate valuations of client assets.

According to an SEC Order, the various compliance deficiencies allowed traders to (i) undervalue securities in order to sell them later at a purported profit and (ii) provide inaccurate information to its pricing vendor and then use those prices to value bonds. The SEC claimed that this was caused by the CIO's failure to implement a requirement under its existing valuation policy in order to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs.

Specifically, the SEC found that the CIO oversaw and approved valuations that traders marked as "undervalued" with notes to "markup gradually." The SEC stated that the committee charged with overseeing the valuation included the principal's relatives and members, who had "[no] relevant expertise."

In addition to finding a failure to implement existing policy, the SEC determined that the fund manager's policies did not (i) conform to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or (ii) address potential issues in its business practices, such as potential conflicts of interest and "its use of valuation models and pricing vendors."

To settle the charges, the private fund manager agreed to pay $5 million and the CIO agreed to a $250,000 penalty.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More