SEC OCIE Director Highlights Risks To Retail Investors

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
SEC Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations ("OCIE") Director Peter Driscoll highlighted key risks facing retail investors caused by bad actors and poor internal controls.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

SEC Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations ("OCIE") Director Peter Driscoll highlighted key risks facing retail investors caused by bad actors and poor internal controls.

Mr. Driscoll emphasized the following bad behaviors:

  • advisers overbilling or providing inaccurate information about client advisory fees and expenses by, among other things, inconsistently calculating the value of the client's assets;
  • advisers failing to comply with the Custody Rule (IAA Rule 206(4)-2);
  • broker-dealers, advisers and transfer agents misappropriating investor assets;
  • advisers providing inadequate conflicts of interest disclosures; and
  • firms or their personnel attempting to borrow from seniors without disclosing the risks or the firm's financial incentives.

OCIE examiners are addressing these risks by, among other things, examining (i) advisory fees and expenses, (ii) compliance with the Custody Rule, (iii) firms' handling of investor funds and assets, (iv) asset verification, (v) disclosure of conflicts of interest examinations, and (vi) potential senior financial abuse and exploitation.

In addition, Mr. Driscoll noted that while the OCIE has "very high expectations for [Chief Compliance Officers]," they do not bear ultimate responsibility for any failures of the firm's compliance program.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More