ARTICLE
30 April 2019

U.S. DOJ Claims Reinterpretation Of Wire Act Did Not Address State Lotteries And Its Vendors

LR
Lewis Roca

Contributor

Lewis Roca logo
Lewis Roca serves clients around the world in complex litigation, intellectual property, business transactions, labor and employment, regulatory counseling, and government relations.  With legal excellence and exceptional client service, we pride ourselves on our ability to win for our clients while serving their highest goals and needs.   
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to leave the gaming industry scratching their heads as it now claims the Office of Legal Counsel's
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) continues to leave the gaming industry scratching their heads as it now claims the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) November 2018 Opinion did not address the Wire Act's applicability to state lotteries and their vendors. This assertion came in a memo from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, dated April 8, 2019.

The memo is contradicted by the very language of the 2018 Opinion. There, the OLC acknowledged that some may have relied on the 2011 Opinion addressing the scope of the Wire Act as states subsequently began to sell lottery tickets online. The 2018 Opinion went on to state, "we do not believe that such reliance interests are sufficient to justify continued adherence to the 2011 opinion." Rather, the 2018 Opinion suggested Congress could broaden or narrow the Wire Act's prohibitions if it found it appropriate to protect such interests.

The change of position appears to be made in an effort to avoid standing in the consolidated New Hampshire Lottery lawsuit against the DOJ. In essence, the argument would be that the lottery and its vendor have no standing to file a suit because the DOJ's OLC Wire Act reinterpretation did not address state lotteries and its vendors. Thus, there would be no issue for the court to address if there would be no injury to the plaintiffs.

On Thursday, April 11, 2019, during a hearing that lasted over four hours, Judge Barbadoro gave the DOJ 14 days to determine whether the Wire Act applies to state lotteries. When counsel for the DOJ requested additional time, Judge Barbadoro responded, "Do the best you can." Now that the DOJ is forced to make a determination about the Wire Act's applicability to state lotteries and their vendors, it will be interesting to see how the DOJ will determine (and justify their position) the Act's applicability to other state-authorized gaming activity.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More