United States: Hacked Law Firms Left Holding The Bag

As a law firm, getting hacked is bad enough. But one Pennsylvania law firm learned an even harder lesson when it sued Bank of America to recover client funds stolen by hackers.1 In O'Neill v. Bank of America, a federal judge dismissed a law firm's claim that its bank bore ultimate responsibility after one of the firm's shareholders unwittingly transferred $580,000 from the firm's IOLTA account to computer hackers in Hong Kong. While the hackers were, "of course . . . the real culprit[s]," the court announced that "as between the law firm and the bank, the law firm must bear the loss."2 The law firm's hacking and the court's decision in O'Neill present important lessons for Kentucky practitioners about cybersecurity.

But first, how could a lawyer wire $580,000 of his clients' funds to computer hackers? In 2017, computer hackers gained access to the e-mail account of Gary Bragg, a shareholder of the law firm O'Neill, Bragg & Staffin, P.C.3 Using Bragg's account, the hackers e-mailed Bragg's partner, Alvin Staffin, and asked him to wire $580,000 from the firm's IOLTA account held at Bank of America to a bank in Hong Kong.4 Posing as Bragg, the hackers claimed a client needed to quickly transfer its money to close a loan transaction, but that Bragg would be out of the office and unable to authorize the transfer himself.5 Staffin, then, instructed Bank of America to transfer the money.6 By the time Staffin and Bragg discovered the ruse, it was too late. Staffin asked Bank of America to stop the transfer, but Bank of America refused, stating it could only request that the Hong Kong bank recall the transfer once that bank received the funds.7 By the time the Hong Kong bank froze the hacker's account, less than $24,000 remained in it.8

Bragg, Staffin, and their firm sued Bank of America. They alleged the bank committed breach of contract and negligence, that the bank violated the Pennsylvania Commercial Code by refusing to halt the wire transfer.9 The court, however, dismissed these claims.10 It did so largely because Bank of America's deposit agreement prohibited an account-holder from cancelling or amending a wire transfer request after Bank of America received it.11 Because Staffin had completed the wire transfer request, he "had no legal right to stop payment" of the clients' funds.12 And because the relationship between Bank of America and Staffin's firm was "purely contractual," the court in O'Neill found that Bank of America upheld its "duty of ordinary care" in complying with the deposit agreement.13

Pennsylvania's Commercial Code did no more to shift the risk of loss to Bank of America. The court recognized the Pennsylvania Commercial Code's "clear presumption" that cancellation of a wire transfer request is ineffective after the request is accepted by the receiving bank (here, Bank of America).14 Only if Bank of America had voluntarily agreed to halt the transfer, or if some other "funds-transfer system rule" otherwise allowed the cancellation would Staffin's cancellation request have been effective.15 While it would certainly lead to "harsh results," the court believed this presumption appropriately alleviated banks of responsibility and risk for wire transfers made "due to a mistake by the sender that could be neither known nor anticipated by the bank."16

Even though this case was decided in Pennsylvania, the same result could very well occur in Kentucky. For one, hackers are targeting law firms—and their wealth of sensitive client data—at a growing rate. In 2017, 22 percent of firms surveyed by the American Bar Association reported experiencing a data breach, up from 14 percent in 2016.17 What's more, the portion of Pennsylvania's Commercial Code that protected Bank of America against the risk of loss in O'Neill mirrors Kentucky's own provisions.18 As such, any Kentucky law firm with a similar deposit agreement risks shouldering the same responsibility should it fall victim to a similar scheme.

The lessons from O'Neill should be clear, but are worth repeating. First: computer hacking schemes are not always obvious. After all, it's not like Staffin thought he was sending client funds to the deposed prince of Nigeria.19 Rather, Staffin responded to an e-mail from his partner's actual e-mail account that concerned an actual client and referenced an actual IOLTA account number.20 In retrospect, the only red flag was that the hacker's e-mail featured a noticeable number of typos and unusually poor grammar.21 Staffin's example, then, reminds lawyers to scrutinize odd or suspicious requests, even when they appear to originate from real, known sources.

Second: talk on the phone. Staffin only learned that Bragg had not actually requested the wire transfer after he had called Bragg on the phone.22 Indeed, Staffin thwarted a second effort by the hackers to secure another, larger wire transfer when he offered a phone call to discuss the request.23 Deception like this over e-mail only works if the victim never stops to call the sender to confirm the validity of the request. Particularly when dealing with a client's sensitive data or money, lawyers are well advised to confirm transactions like the one in O'Neill over the phone or in person.

Third: lawyers should review their IOLTA account deposit agreements. Staffin's lawsuit failed mainly because Bank of America's deposit agreement placed the risk of a mistaken wire transfer request on the firm and not the bank. That same agreement also permitted Bank of America to overdraw the IOLTA account to sufficiently fund the wire transfer.24 That meant that even though Bragg's client had only deposited $1,900 in his firm's IOLTA account, Bank of America used the funds of clients held in the same account to complete the transfer.25 Lawyers maintaining IOLTA accounts should carefully review the allocation of risk posed by their bank's deposit agreement.

Finally, O'Neill gives lawyers reason to consider obtaining "cyber insurance." Cyber insurance policies may cover liability for costs arising out of privacy breaches and cyber extortion.26 Indeed, the risk of a data breach or cyber-attack, despite a lawyer's best efforts, may prove the warning by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility that firms fall into two categories: "those that have been hacked and those that will be."27 Kentucky firms should accordingly pause and take note to avoid what befell Bragg and Staffin in O'Neill.

Footnotes

1. O'Neill v. Bank of Am. Corp., 2018 WL 5921004, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193302, at *2-4, (E.D. Pa. Nov. 13, 2018).

2. O'Neill, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS, 193302, at *28-29.

3. Id. at *3-4.

4. Id. at *3-5. IOLTA accounts – or "Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts" – are maintained by law firms and used to hold nominal or short-time client funds. See, e.g., Kentucky SCR 3.830.

5. Id. at *4-5.

6. Id. at *5-6.

7. Id. at *7.

8. Staffin, Bragg, and their law firm ultimately recovered just $58,730.11 from the hacker's account after engaging Hong Kong counsel to recover the stolen funds. Id. at *8-9.

9. Id. at *10-28.

10. Id.

11. Id. at *11.

12. Id.

13. Id. at *25.

14. Id. at *19-20 (citing 13 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 4A211(c)).

15. Id. at *20.

16. Id.

17. David G. Ries, 2017 Security, American Bar Association (Dec. 1, 2017), https://www.americanbar.org/groups/law_practice/publications/techreport/ 2017/security/ (last visited Jan. 16, 2019).

18. Compare 13 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 4A211(c), with Ky. Rev. Stat. § 355.4A- 211(3).

19. The Nigerian Prince: Old Scam, New Twist, Better Business Bureau, https:// www.bbb.org/new-york-city/get-consumer-help/articles/the-nigerian-princeold- scam-new-twist/ (last visited Jan. 16, 2019).

20. O'Neill, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 193302, at *3-5.

21. Id. at *4-5.

22. Id. at *6.

23. Id. at *8.

24. Id. at *11-13.

25. Id.

26. Jeffrey A. Franklin, Cyber Insurance for Law Firms, American Bar Association ( June 29, 2017), https://www.americanbar.org/groups/gpsolo/publications/ gp_solo/2016/may-june/cyber_insurance_law_firms/ (last visited Jan. 16, 2019).

27. Formal Opinion 482: Lawyers' Obligations After an Electronic Data Breach or Cyberattack, American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility (Oct. 17, 2018), https://www.americanbar. org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/aba_formal_ , American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility (Oct. 17, 2018), https://www.americanbar. org/content/dam/aba/administrative/professional_responsibility/aba_formal_ op_483.pdf (last visited Jan. 16, 2019).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions