United States: Subordination Agreement Barred Bankruptcy Discovery Concerning Senior Debt

Last Updated: April 15 2019
Article by Timothy Hoffmann and Mark Douglas
Most Read Contributor in United States, September 2019

In In re Argon Credit, LLC, 2019 WL 169315 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Jan. 10, 2019), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled that, in accordance with section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a standby clause in a subordination agreement prevented a subordinated lender from conducting discovery concerning the senior lender's claims. According to the court, the subordinated lender's efforts to circumvent the clear terms of the subordination agreement by claiming that it was acting on behalf of the bankruptcy estate, or investigating the senior lender's alleged fraud, were unavailing.

Enforceability of Subordination Agreements in Bankruptcy

If the claims of one creditor or group of creditors are subordinated in accordance with the provisions of a valid and enforceable agreement, section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the subordination agreement is enforceable in a bankruptcy case to the same extent that it would be enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law.

In construing the validity, enforceability, and application of a subordination agreement, section 510(a) directs the bankruptcy court to look to applicable nonbankruptcy law—generally state law—as well as the terms of the agreement itself. See Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 510.03 (16th ed. 2019). If there is ambiguity in the agreement concerning the terms or extent of the subordination, a bankruptcy court may refuse to enforce it. See In re Bank of New England Corp., 364 F.3d 355, 367 (1st Cir. 2004) (remanding the case to the bankruptcy court to determine under New York law whether the subordination agreement actually provided for payment of postpetition interest on the senior debt prior to any payment on the junior debt), on remand, 404 B.R. 17 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2009) (finding that the parties did not intend to subordinate claims for postpetition interest), aff'd, 426 B.R. 1 (D. Mass. 2010), aff'd, 646 F.3d 90 (1st Cir. 2011).

Moreover, a chapter 11 plan need not necessarily give effect to the explicit terms of a subordination agreement in providing for the treatment of creditor claims. See In re Tribune Media Co., 587 B.R. 606, 614 (D. Del. 2018) (because section 510(a) is expressly excepted from section 1129(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, a nonconsensual chapter 11 plan that does not fully enforce a subordination agreement may be confirmed so long as "the plan does not discriminate unfairly, and is fair and equitable").

Argon Credit

Argon Credit, LLC, and Argon X, LLC (collectively, "Argon") operated an online lending platform providing near-prime consumer installment loans. To fund its operations, Argon borrowed $20 million in 2015 under a senior secured revolving credit facility. The debt was subsequently assigned to another lender (the "Senior Lender"), which subsequently increased the funds available under the revolving facility to $37.5 million (the "Senior Debt").

Certain Argon equity holders (collectively, the "Junior Lender") also made loans to Argon in 2015 (the "Junior Debt") on a subordinated basis. The subordination agreement and certain subsequent subordination agreements (collectively, the "subordination agreement") entered into by the Junior Lender and the Senior Lender provided for a "standby limitation" as follows:

Notwithstanding any breach of default by [Argon] . . . under the [Junior Debt agreement], the [Junior Lender] shall not at any time or in any manner foreclose upon, take possession of, or attempt to realize on any Collateral, or proceed in any way to enforce any claims it has or may have against [Argon] or any other Obligor unless and until the Obligations to the Senior Lender have been fully and indefeasibly paid and satisfied in full.

In 2016, Argon filed a chapter 11 case in the Northern District of Illinois. After converting the case to a chapter 7 liquidation, the bankruptcy court approved a stipulation (the "discovery stipulation") between the chapter 7 trustee and the Senior Lender coordinating discovery by the trustee and all "parties in interest" under Rule 2004 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure regarding the enforceability of the Senior Debt. In accordance with the stipulation, all discovery requests were initiated in the first instance by the trustee, unless a party in interest conferred in good faith with the trustee concerning requested discovery and the trustee elected not to pursue the request, in which case the party seeking discovery could request it directly without filing a separate motion for court approval under Bankruptcy Rule 2004.

The trustee sought discovery from the Senior Lender of various documents related to the Senior Debt. The Senior Lender moved to quash the subpoena. The Junior Lender objected and (with the trustee's approval) sought an order from the bankruptcy court enforcing the subpoena.

The Senior Lender argued that the standby clause in the subordination agreement precluded the Junior Lender from seeking the requested discovery. The Junior Lender countered, among other things, that the subordination agreement did not bar it from obtaining discovery: (i) on behalf of the trustee and/or the estate; or (ii) regarding the Senior Lender's alleged fraud in inducing Argon to incur the Senior Debt.

The Bankruptcy Court's Ruling

The bankruptcy court found that the standby clause in the subordination agreement was "an explicit and express 'silent seconds' provision aimed at preventing 'obstructionist behavior' [and] it [went] above and beyond the mere maintenance of the 'hierarchy of lien priorities'" in a subordination agreement (citing In re MPM Silicones, L.L.C., 2019 WL 121003, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 4, 2019)). According to the court, the clause prevented the Junior Lender "from using the bankruptcy process to affirmatively obtain discovery" from the Senior Lender regarding the Senior Debt.

Specifically, the court ruled that the Junior Lender could rely on neither the discovery stipulation nor Bankruptcy Rule 2004 to obtain discovery against the Senior Lender. The plain text of the subordination agreement, the court wrote, prevents the Junior Lender "from proceed[ing] in any way to enforce any claims" against the Senior Lender. According to the court, any act by the Junior Lender to obtain discovery concerning the Senior Debt "is a calculated, if intermediate, act to enforce" its claims against Argon. "It simply cannot be assumed," the court wrote, "that [the Junior Lender] is asking for discovery for no reason; [it] cannot be presumed [to be] irrational."

The bankruptcy court rejected the Junior Lender's argument that it was seeking discovery on behalf of the estate with the trustee's consent. Although the Junior Lender did coordinate its discovery requests with the trustee, the court explained, the trustee informed the Junior Lender that the estate could not afford to press forward with discovery demands after the Senior Lender refused the trustee's initial request for documents but did not oppose the Junior Lender's efforts to pursue further discovery. Nor did the trustee request that the Junior Lender perform duties on behalf of the trustee or the estate.

The court also rejected the Junior Lender's argument that the discovery stipulation somehow amended or waived the standby clause. According to the court, there was no clear indication that the Senior Lender, by entering into the discovery stipulation, either: (i) assented to a modification or amendment of the subordination agreement; or (ii) intentionally relinquished its rights under the subordination agreement, which generally benefited many parties in interest, not merely the Junior Lender.

Finally, the bankruptcy court was unpersuaded by the Junior Lender's argument that it should be allowed to investigate whether the Senior Lender fraudulently induced Argon to enter into the secured credit facility and the related subordination agreement by promising a $75 million line of credit that the Senior Lender never intended to provide. According to the court, Delaware law (which governed) does not permit nonenforcement of a bargained-for agreement between sophisticated commercial actors whenever one party claims that fraud has occurred. In addition, although a subordination agreement may be rescinded under certain circumstances as a remedy under Delaware law, the Junior Lender was not seeking rescission in this case. Thus, the subordination agreement would be enforced in Argon's bankruptcy case until a court ruled otherwise in an appropriate proceeding. In such a proceeding, the court wrote, the Junior Lender might be entitled to discovery from the Senior Lender "under the ordinary civil rules."


The court's ruling in Argon Credit indicates that, absent ambiguity or some other infirmity in a subordination agreement, a bankruptcy court will enforce the agreement in accordance with section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code. The bankruptcy court in Argon Credit foreclosed the Junior Lender from performing what the court perceived to be an end run around the express terms of the subordination agreement. As noted, however, the court did not rule out the possibility that the Junior Lender could obtain discovery in separate litigation over the enforceability of the subordination agreement.

Interestingly, in a footnote, the bankruptcy court noted that the Junior Lender's equity interest in Argon did not confer "party in interest" status on the Junior Lender independently of its claim based upon the Junior Debt because it had "no 'legally protected interest' based on the equity interest[] alone absent a showing of a possibility of a surplus estate" (citation omitted). Moreover, because the Junior Lender did not raise the argument, the court declined to consider whether its status as an equity interest holder made it a party in interest for purposes of the discovery stipulation. Had Argon's case not been converted to chapter 7 or had the estate had a surplus, this might have been a more significant issue. See 11 U.S.C. § 1109(b) (defining "party in interest" in a chapter 11 case to include "an equity security holder").

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions