ARTICLE
29 January 2019

CFTC Chair Denies Intent To Pull SEF Proposal

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
CFTC Chair J. Christopher Giancarlo stated that, contrary to certain news reports, he has not made a decision to retract the CFTC proposal to rewrite rules governing swap execution facilities.
United States Finance and Banking

CFTC Chair J. Christopher Giancarlo stated that, contrary to certain news reports, he has not made a decision to retract the CFTC proposal to rewrite rules governing swap execution facilities. (See generally " Swap Execution Facilities, the Sequel.") Mr. Giancarlo characterized claims suggesting that he was "walking away from fixing flawed SEF rules" as "absurd." He further stated that "[a]ny thought of re-proposing any elements of [the] proposal is premature before public comments [are] received and considered." Mr. Giancarlo's comments came in response to a report in The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday that Mr. Giancarlo "plans to abandon an existing proposal . . . and rewrite it after incorporating industry feedback."

Commentary / NihalPatel

Withdrawing the proposal - even if the CFTC were to change its mind and decide it was bad policy - would be somewhat surprising. The CFTC is not required to act on the proposal as is. It can choose, after reviewing comments, to (i) do nothing, (ii) issue a re-proposal, or (iii) move forward to final rules based on the existing proposal.

It remains unclear what exactly the CFTC intends to do, but not indicating its intentions would be a normal approach to notice-and-comment rulemaking. That is, Mr. Giancarlo seems to be suggesting that the CFTC will consider comments on the proposal and then decide what to do. (The comment period is scheduled to close on February 13.)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More