United States: Ninth Circuit Confirms: Apparently Honey Badger Does Care . . . About Trademarks

Last Updated: December 11 2018
Article by Brian Darville

The Ninth Circuit recently reversed summary judgment for Defendant Drape Creative Inc. ("DGI") and Papyrus Recycled Greetings, Inc. ("PRG") for using the Honey Badger trademarks – Honey Badger Don't Care and Honey Badger Don't Give a S___ – on greeting cards.  The court held that disputed factual issues existed as to whether defendant's use of the Honey Badger trademarks is explicitly misleading as to the source or content of the cards under the second prong of the Rogers v. Grimaldi test for balancing First Amendment interests in artistic expression and the Lanham Act's purposes in securing trademark rights.  Gordon v. Drape Creative, Inc., Case No. 16-56715, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 32796 (9th Cir. Nov. 20, 2018). 

Plaintiff Christopher Gordon created a popular YouTube video known for its catchphrases "Honey Badger Don't Care" and "Honey Badger Don't Give a S___".  Gordon, known creatively as Randall, added comedic narration using these phrases to a National Geographic video of a honey badger going about its business – taking honey from a bees nest while being swarmed by hundreds of bees, chasing jackals, attacking, killing, getting bit by and then eating a cobra, etc. – all the time aggressively ignoring the inherent peril.  The video went viral and Honey Badger Don't Care became one of America's Hottest Brands in November 2011.  Gordon registered Honey Badger Don't Care with the USPTO (including for greeting cards in Class 16) and owns common law rights in Honey Badger Don't Give a S___.

Between May and October 2012, Gordon's company – Randall's Honey Badger, LLC ("RHB") entered into licensing agreements with Zazzle, Inc. and The Duck Company for various honey badger themed products including greeting cards, using the Honey Badger marks. 

Beginning in June 2012, Defendants sold seven different greeting cards using the Honey Badger marks – Honey Badger Don't Care and Honey Badger Don't Give a S___."  For example, two "Election Cards" showed a picture of a honey badger wearing a patriotic hat and stated "The Election's Coming."  The inside of one card said "Me and Honey Badger Don't Give a $#%@! Happy Birthday."  The inside of the other card said "Honey Badger and me just don't care."  Happy Birthday."  Two "Birthday Cards" featured different pictures of a honey badger and stated either "It's Your Birthday!" or "Honey Badger Heard It's Your Birthday!"  Inside both cards said "Honey Badger Don't Give a S---."  The backs of the cards included the mark "Recycled Paper Greetings" and the web site URLs www.dcistudios.com and www.prgreetings.com.  DCI's president testified that he drafted all of the cards, could not recall what inspired the designs, but claimed he never heard of a video involving a honey badger.

Gordon sued for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act among other claims.  The district court granted summary judgment for defendants ruling that defendants' greeting cards were expressive works, and holding that Gordon's claims were barred by the test set forth in Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989).

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit observed that it has adopted the Second Circuit's Rogers test to strike an appropriate balance between First Amendment interests in protecting artistic expression and the Lanham Act's purposes in securing trademark rights.

Under Rogers, we read the Act "to apply to artistic works only where the public interest in avoiding consumer confusion outweighs the public interest in free expression."  Slip op. at *11-12 (quoting Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 900 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Rogers, 875 F.2d at 999)).  More concretely, we apply the Act to an expressive work only if the defendant's use of the mark (1) is not artistically relevant to the work or (2) explicitly misleads consumers as to the source or content of the work."  Slip op. at *12 (quoting Mattel, 296 F.3d at 901).  Effectively, Rogers employs the First Amendment as a rule of construction to avoid conflict between the Constitution and the Lanham Act."  Id.

The Ninth Circuit clarified the burden of proof under the Rogers test:

The Rogers test requires the defendant to make a threshold legal showing that its allegedly infringing use is part of an expressive work protected by the First Amendment.  If the defendant successfully makes that threshold showing, then the plaintiff claiming trademark infringement bears a heightened burden – the plaintiff must satisfy not only the likelihood-of-confusion test but also at least one of Roger's two prongs.  . . . .  That is, when the defendant demonstrates that First Amendment interests are at stake, the plaintiff claiming infringement must show (1) that it has a valid, protectable trademark, and (2) that the mark is either not artistically relevant to the underlying work or explicitly misleading as to the source or content of the work.  If the plaintiff satisfies both elements, it still must prove that its trademark has been infringed by showing that the defendant's use of the mark is likely to cause confusion."

Slip op. at *12-13 (citations omitted).

The Ninth Circuit determined that defendants met their initial burden of demonstrating that the greeting cards are expressive works protected under the First Amendment.  "Each of defendants' cards relies on graphics and text to convey a humorous message through the juxtaposition of an event of some significance – a birthday, Halloween, an election – with the honey badger's aggressive assertion of apathy."  Slip op. at *23.   The court observed that "[a]lthough the cards may not share the creative artistry of Charles Schulz or Sandra Boynton, the First Amendment protects expressive works '[e]ven if [they are] not the expressive equal of Anna Karenina or Citizen Kane.'"  Id. (quoting Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc., 724 F.3d 1235, 1241 (9 Cir. 2013)). 

Because defendants met their initial burden, the burden shifted to Gordon to raise a triable issue of fact as to at least one of the Rogers two prongs – that the mark is not artistically relevant to the underlying work or is explicitly misleading as to the source or content of the work.  Slip op. at *23.

The court found that use of the Honey Badger marks was "artistically relevant" to the defendants' greeting cards because "'the level of artistic relevance of the trademark or other identifying material to the work merely must be above zero.'"  Id. (quoting Brown, 724 F.3d at 1243). "'[E]ven the slightest artistic relevance' will suffice." Id. (quoting Brown, 724 F.3d at 1243).  The marks were relevant to defendants' greeting cards as the phrases were the punchline on which the cards' humor turns.  Slip op. at *24.  The court concluded that Gordon had not raised a triable issue of fact with respect to Rogers' "artistic relevance" prong.

Under the second prong of Rogers, the creator of the challenged work can be liable under the Lanham Act if the creator's use of the mark is "explicitly misleading as to source or content."  Slip op. at *24 (quoting Rogers, 875 F.2d at 999). 

"This second prong of the Rogers test 'points directly at the purpose of trademark law, namely to avoid confusion in the marketplace by allowing a trademark owner to prevent others from duping consumers into buying a product they mistakenly believe is sponsored [or created] by the trademark owner."  Brown, 724 F.3d at 1245 (other quotations omitted).  The "key here [is] that the creator must explicitly mislead consumers," and we accordingly focus on "the nature of the [junior user's] behavior" rather than on the "impact of the use."  Id. at 1245-46.

Slip op. at *24-25 (emphasis in original).

The Ninth Circuit rejected the district court's "rigid requirement that, to be explicitly misleading, the defendant must make 'an affirmative statement of the plaintiff's sponsorship or endorsement.'  Such a statement may be sufficient to show that the use of a mark is explicitly misleading, but is not a prerequisite."  Id., Slip op. at *25.  "In some instances, the use of a mark alone may explicitly mislead consumers about a product's source if consumers would ordinarily identify the source by the mark itself.  Id., Slip op. at *25-26.  "A more relevant consideration is the degree to which the junior user uses the mark in the same way as the senior user."  Id., Slip op. at *26.  It reasoned that "the potential for explicitly misleading usage is especially strong when the senior user and the junior user both use the mark in similar artistic expressions."  Id., Slip op. at *27-28.  "[U]sing a mark as the centerpiece of an expressive work itself, unadorned with any artistic contribution from the junior user, may reflect nothing more than an effort to 'induce the sale of goods or services' by confusion or 'lessen[] the distinctiveness and thus the commercial value of' a competitor's mark."  Id., Slip op. at *28-29. 

The court ruled that it could not decide as a matter of law that defendants' use of the Honey Badger marks was not explicitly misleading.  "There is at least a triable issue of fact as to whether defendants simply used Gordon's mark with minimal artistic expression of their own, and used it in the same way that Gordon was using it – to identify the source of humorous greeting cards in which the bottom line is "Honey Badger don't care."  The court held that a jury must decide whether defendants' use of the Honey Badger marks on one or more of the greeting cards is explicitly misleading as to the source or content of the cards.  Id., Slip op. at *30, 31.  It reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Okay.  Here's a link to Randall's video:  The Crazy Nasty--- Honey Badger 

Rating:  PG-13 (Mild profanity; Animal on animal violence)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions