ARTICLE
15 October 2018

CAFC Affirms PTAB's Priority Determination In Natural Alternatives v. Iancu

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Iancu., No. 2017-1962 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 1, 2018), the CAFC affirmed the PTAB's priority determination invalidating Natural Alternative's patent directed to a human dietary supplement that increases the anaerobic working capacity of muscle and other tissues.
United States Intellectual Property

In Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Iancu., No. 2017-1962 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 1, 2018), the CAFC affirmed the PTAB's priority determination invalidating Natural Alternative's patent directed to a human dietary supplement that increases the anaerobic working capacity of muscle and other tissues. The CAFC held that amendments made to a parent application's priority claim can affect the child application's priority claim, thus allowing earlier-filed applications in the family to be cited as prior art against the later-filed child application. Further discussion of this decision can be found on Finnegan's Federal Circuit IP Blog.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More