United States: The Blockchain Revolution: Time To Ramp Up Your Software Patenting Effort?

Last Updated: September 24 2018
Article by Ward And Smith, P.A.

As you read this article, hundreds of startups and other organizations are working on blockchain applications in such areas as energy trading, data storage trading, peer-to-peer lending, and verifying professional or other credentials.

A lot of these organizations, including tech giants and large financial institutions, are seeking patents on these applications, a rush reminiscent of the one that occurred in the 1990's and 2000's with the advent of the World Wide Web and e-commerce.  What are the current prospects for this new wave of blockchain-related patent applications? 

Although well over 1000 patent applications for U.S. patents have been filed for blockchain-related inventions in the last four years, less than 100 of these applications have emerged as U.S. patents.  A quick survey of published applications relating to blockchain reveals that a significant number have been awaiting examination for over two years.  Thus, the dearth of issued patents can, in large part, be attributed to a backlog in the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). 

There is also some evidence that blockchain-related patent applications, particularly those related to financial or other business applications, have been slowed by the obstacles to software-related inventions raised by the United States Supreme Court's landmark 2014 decision in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l, which caused widespread doubt about the ability to obtain and enforce computer-related invention patents and the desirability of investing resources to attempt to obtain and enforce such patents.  However, recent developments in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("Federal Circuit") and the USPTO suggest that such doubts may be misplaced.

Patent Trolls and the Alice Decision

Alice was the Supreme Court's response to calls from affected industries and other parties to rein in what was perceived as abuse of the patent system by patent "trolls."  Patent trolls are assertion entities that are viewed as exploiting the USPTO's inability to adequately examine software-related patent applications.  Such entities obtain or purchase poorly examined patents and then leverage the threat of litigation defense costs to extract settlement payments from alleged infringers. 

Prior art searching during the examination of patent applications has, for the most part, relied on relatively limited databases of published documents, mostly issued patents, published patent applications, and technical papers.  Prior to Alice, examiners were hindered by a general lack of published evidence about software-related patent claims, making invalidation difficult, even when such claims were of such breadth that they appeared to be blatantly unpatentable. 

Due to the nature of the software industry, many commonplace techniques were never patented nor did anyone bother to describe them in a technical paper.  Moreover, many software inventions tended to be computer-implemented modifications of long-used processes (e.g., certain commercial or financial processes), which were unlikely topics of patents or technical papers.  Therefore, examiners were ill-equipped to put together cases of lack of novelty or obviousness against such claims, causing many dubious patents to issue. 

Armed with such a patent and its statutory presumption of validity, a patent assertion entity could take advantage of the high costs of litigation to extract settlements that were arguably not justified by the value of the claims being asserted. 

Based on 35 U.S.C. § 101 ("Section 101"), which defines what type of subject matter is eligible for patenting,  Alice and its follow-up opinions outline streamlined techniques for the USPTO and district courts to dispose of questionable patent claims without the time and expense typically required to prove non-infringement or invalidity of a patent claim.  

District courts can use the new techniques to weed out illegitimate patents in the early stages of a case, such as at summary judgment, before litigation costs can escalate, which means defendants can also wield greater leverage in settlement negotiations.  Of greater or equal importance, the USPTO can use the techniques to prevent the issuance of such patents by sidestepping limitations on patent examiners' ability to locate published prior art.

The Initial Effect of Alice

There is ample evidence that Alice and the related techniques flowing from it have achieved at least some of the intended effect.  After Alice, the USPTO issued new guidelines for examining computer-implemented inventions that provided examiners a template for invalidating claims under Section 101 and, armed with these guidelines, examiners have significantly slowed issuance of software-related patents, especially in the area of e-commerce. 

From the time the Alice decision was handed down to August of 2017, the Federal Circuit invalidated 91 percent of the 111 patents involved in appeals, based on the lack of subject matter eligibility.  District courts also invalidated a relatively large number of patents on similar grounds, often by summary judgment, and the Federal Circuit has upheld many of these decisions. 

The pace of invalidation slowed somewhat in 2017, perhaps due to a reduction in the number of pre-Alice patents still subject to invalidation, but also because, inevitably, the Federal Circuit began circumscribing the application of Alice in subsequent cases.  Nonetheless, Alice remained a powerful tool for efficiently disposing of computer-related invention claims, particularly in the USPTO.

And Then Came Berkheimer

In February 2018, however, in the case of Berkheimer v. HP, Inc., the Federal Circuit walked back Alice in a manner that is likely to be further reaching in effect, especially when considering the USPTO's reaction. 

In Berkheimer, the Federal Circuit considered an appeal of a summary judgment of patent eligibility for claims of a patent directed to management of digital assets.  The court clarified that consideration of subject matter eligibility is a question of law based on certain factual issues.  This means, for example, that invalidation under Section 101 at summary judgment requires that there be no material issues of fact regarding whether a claim simply performs an abstract idea using "well understood, routine and conventional activities." 

Berkheimer now makes it much more difficult to dispose of a computer-related patent at the summary judgment phase, prior to a full trial and the related higher litigation costs. 

Perhaps more importantly, while Berkheimer did not necessarily apply to the manner in which the USPTO applies Alice during patent examination, the USPTO followed Berkheimer by changing its examination procedure pertaining to subject matter eligibility.   

The new procedure, announced in April 2018, requires patent examiners to provide a tangible evidentiary basis for assertions that proposed patent claims merely represent abstract ideas implemented using well-known conventional techniques, thus shifting the burden further onto the examiner to prove ineligibility.  

It will likely be as difficult for examiners to produce the type of evidence required under this new procedure as it was for them to produce evidence for lack of novelty and obviousness before Alice.   

The Effect of Berkheimer

As a result of Berkheimer, the USPTO may soon again become more of a speed bump than a roadblock for computer-related patent applications.  

Added to the likelihood that Berkheimer will make it significantly more difficult for defendants to dispose of software-related patents in a summary manner, the balance between patentees and potential defendants may have again shifted.

Therefore, it also may be time to re-evaluate any doubts you might have about the efficacy of pursuing those new blockchain or other computer-related patent applications.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In association with
Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centers
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions