ARTICLE
12 September 2018

Potential #MeToo-Motivated Laws Address More Than Just Sexual Harassment

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
The #MeToo movement has spawned several bills, many of which are aimed at prohibiting private arbitration of sexual harassment claims or outlawing confidentiality...
United States Employment and HR

The #MeToo movement has spawned several bills, many of which are aimed at prohibiting private arbitration of sexual harassment claims or outlawing confidentiality provisions in settlement agreements addressing sexual harassment claims.

However, not all of these proposed new laws are directed exclusively at sexual harassment claims. For example, in California, a bill that is currently awaiting the governor's signature targets mandatory employee arbitration agreements. Specifically, the bill prohibits an employer from requiring any job applicant or employee to waive any right, forum, or procedure for a violation of any provision of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (the "FEHA"). The FEHA prohibits discrimination, harassment, or retaliation based on a large list of protected classifications, including, for example, race, national origin, religion, age, and disability. This bill therefore does not only address arbitration of sexual harassment claims, but rather, if passed, would prohibit arbitration of virtually all claims for employment discrimination.

A similar bill is under consideration in New Jersey. Under this law, nondisclosure provisions in settlement agreements related to discrimination, retaliation, or harassment claims would be deemed against public policy and unenforceable. Like the California bill, the New Jersey legislation has a broad reach and does not limit its scope to sexual harassment or discrimination claims.

While it is fairly widely known that potential laws prohibiting arbitration of sexual harassment claims and nondisclosure agreements related to sexual harassment are cropping up in many states, many employers are unaware that such laws also could apply to a wide array of other types of employment-related claims. This means that employers should be cognizant when using form arbitration agreements or settlement agreements, particularly when operating in multiple states, and should always consult counsel before entering into such agreements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More