ARTICLE
2 September 2018

Broker-Dealer Settles Charges Of Violating Market Access Rule

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A broker-dealer agreed to pay $1.1 million to settle charges brought by FINRA and eight securities exchanges for a variety of trading control failures...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

A broker-dealer agreed to pay $1.1 million to settle charges brought by FINRA and eight securities exchanges for a variety of trading control failures, including failure to have procedures to prevent erroneous or duplicative orders and other risk management deficiencies.

FINRA's Department of Market Regulation conducted an investigation of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC ("MSCO") on behalf of FINRA and other exchanges regarding the firm's compliance with the Market Access Rule. According to FINRA, MSCO neglected to institute automated pre-trade hard blocks that would prevent the submission of orders in excess of certain pre-set aggregate capital limits, as required by the Market Access Rule. Instead, MSCO relied on an alert system that made certain personnel aware that MSCO was in danger of breaching these limits. The responsible personnel then had the ability to implement a hard-block to prevent the entry of any further orders. In addition, FINRA determined that MSCO's pre-trade controls for high-touch clients were improperly based on MSCO's aggregate capital limits and were not customer-specific based on appropriate due diligence as to each customer's business and financial condition.

MSCO neither admitted nor denied the charges.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More