ARTICLE
20 August 2018

The Federal Circuit Reverses Long Standing PTAB Precedent On The IPR Time Bar Exception

RG
Ropes & Gray LLP

Contributor

Ropes & Gray is a preeminent global law firm with approximately 1,400 lawyers and legal professionals serving clients in major centers of business, finance, technology and government. The firm has offices in New York, Washington, D.C., Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, London, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul.
Petitioners now have one year to file IPR petitions even if the underlying district court action is eventually voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.
United States Intellectual Property

On August 16, 2018, the Federal Circuit overruled the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("PTAB") long-standing practice of accepting certain inter partes review ("IPR") petitions outside of the one-year time bar window prescribed by Section 315(b) of Title 35. The PTAB has consistently held that, where the underlying district court action was dismissed without prejudice, service of the complaint does not trigger the one-year time bar. The Federal Circuit in Click-to-Call Techs., LP v. Ingenio, Inc. (opinion here) reversed and found that service of the complaint does trigger the one-year time bar, even if the action is later dismissed voluntarily without prejudice. Petitioners now have one year to file IPR petitions even if the underlying district court action is eventually voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.

We will continue to monitor further developments regarding the impact of these decisions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More