United States: South Carolina Opinion: Insurer May Maintain Direct Legal Malpractice Action Against Counsel Hired To Represent Insured

Last Updated: July 17 2018
Article by Brian Comer

The South Carolina Supreme Court issued its opinion today in Sentry Select Insurance Co. v. Maybank Law Firm, LLC, No. 2016-001351, Slip Opinion No. 27806 (click on the citation to be redirected to the full opinion). Justice John Cannon Few issued the opinion for the majority.

General Summary

The case involves an insurance carrier ("Insurer") that brought a legal malpractice lawsuit in federal district court against the lawyer and law firm ("Law Firm") it hired to defend its insured in an automobile accident case. The district court requested that the Court answer the following two questions:

(1) Whether an insurer may maintain a direct malpractice action against counsel hired to represent its insured where the insurance company has a duty to defend?

(2) Whether a legal malpractice claim may be assigned to a third-party who is responsible for payment of legal fees and any judgment incurred as a result of the litigation in which the alleged malpractice arose?

The Court answered the first question "yes," subject to certain limitations. The Court declined to answer the second question.

The Details

In the underlying case, Insurer hired Law Firm to defend a trucking company. Law Firm failed to answer requests to admit served by the plaintiff by the deadline. Insurer claimed Law Firm's failure ultimately led to a higher settlement cost for the case ($900,000) than the range originally projected by Law Firm ($75,000 to $125,000). Insurer then filed a lawsuit against Law Firm pursuant to various theories, including negligence. The district court certified the two questions above to the South Carolina Supreme Court.

In answering the first question, the Court was clear that when an insurance carrier hires an attorney to represent its insured, the attorney-client relationship is between the attorney and insured. The attorney's fiduciary duty is to the insured/client, and not the insurer. However, the insurer has a contractual duty to defend, pay the attorney for his/her time, and pay for settlement or any judgment. Because of this "unique position," the Court answered that an insurer may bring a direct malpractice action against counsel hired to represent an insured. However, this position is subject to certain limitations.

[W]e will not place an attorney in a conflict between his client's interests and the interests of the insurer. Thus, the insurer may recover only for the attorney's breach of duty to his client, when the insurer proves the breach is the proximate cause of damages to the insurer. If the interests of the client are the slightest bit inconsistent with the insurer's interest, there can be no liability of the attorney to the insurer, for we will not permit the attorney's duty to the client to be affected by the interests of the insurance company. Whether there is any inconsistency between the client's and the insurer's interest in the circumstances of an individual case is a question of law to be answered by the trial court.

The Court noted its position was consistent with established policy, citing to Fabian v. Lindsay, 410 S.C. 475, 491, 765 S.E.2d 132, 141 (2014). The Court also noted its decision served the deterrent purpose of tort law, i.e., to prevent such conduct and injuries. Finally, it stated the position was consisted with the rule adopted by the majority of states considering the issue.

In responding to concerns raised by Law Firm, the Court emphasized the loyalties of the attorney may not be divided, and the "attorney owes no separate duty to the insurer." There is no "dual attorney-client relationship" in South Carolina. The insurer may not intrude on the attorney-client privilege between lawyer and insured/client. The Court also cited to South Carolina law that a lawyer may not permit a person who recommends or pays the lawyer to render legal services to direct or regulate the lawyer's professional judgment in providing services. The Court reiterated its opinion was limited so as to avoid "opening the door to other non-clients to sue attorneys for legal malpractice." Finally, the Court stated an insurer must prove its case by clear and convincing evidence.

The Court declined to answer the second question. It was satisfied its answer to the first question rendered the second question "not determinative of the cause then pending in the certifying court," and not necessary. (Citing SCACR 244(a) and 244(f)).

Justice Donald W. Beatty issued a lengthy dissent in which Justice Kaye G. Hearn concurred. He provided the history and jurisprudence concerning legal malpractice claims and the attorney-client privilege. He noted most jurisdictions allowing an insurer to pursue a legal malpractice claim against hired counsel did so based on their recognition of a dual attorney-client relationship, which was a belief not shared by the majority. The dissent focused on the majority's failure to identify a specific theory of recovery to serve as a basis for a direct legal action and proceeded to address both theories advanced by Insurer, i.e., third-party beneficiary of contract theory and negligence.

The dissent rejected third-party beneficiary of contract as a theory justifying a legal malpractice action by Insurer. Per the dissent, Insurer is merely performing its contractual duty to the insured; it is not the intended beneficiary of the contract of representation between the insured and Law Firm. With regard to a negligence theory, the dissent found that the factors set forth in Fabian weighed against allowing Insurer to bring a cause of action in tort for legal malpractice, and Justice Beatty addressed each factor. The dissent also set forth that it disagreed with the insurance carrier that the second question should be answered "yes." The dissent cited to Skipper v. ACE Property and Casualty Co., 413 S.C. 33, 38, 775 S.E.2d 37, 39 (2015) and policy considerations as grounds for denying the assignment of legal claims outright.

I defend professional negligence claims, including claims for legal malpractice, so I will be curious to follow the outcome of this case in the federal district court. I welcome your comments!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions