United States: Considerations For 2008 Compensation Disclosure

Last Updated: December 8 2008
Article by Laura D. Richman

Originally published December 5, 2008

Keywords: Executive Compensation Disclosure, SEC, bailout program, Compensation Discussion and Analysis, CDA, Emergency Stabilization Act, EESA,

Public companies preparing their third year of executive compensation disclosure under the relatively new Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requirements are doing so in an environment where executive compensation has become an important and very visible component of federal government bailout programs. In addition, SEC guidance exists based on its experiences reviewing two years of executive compensation disclosure. Companies should consider the impact of these developments and interpretations on their annual executive compensation disclosure, particularly with respect to drafting the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A).

EESA-Related Considerations

The executive compensation provisions of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and related regulations (EESA), as a technical matter, apply only to companies that are participating in EESA programs. However, those provisions, and the political dynamics giving rise to them, are shaping the conversations about current and future executive compensation and associated disclosure, even for non-participating companies. To the extent that EESA compensation requirements influence the deliberations and the actions of a compensation committee, those principles need to be described in the CD&A.

For example, financial institutions participating in EESA's capital purchase program must not use compensation incentives that encourage senior executive officers to take unnecessary and excessive risks that threaten the value of the institutions. The regulations issued by the Department of Treasury require that the compensation committees of these participating institutions meet annually with the senior risk officers of the company to be sure that incentive compensation does not encourage such risk, with a certification in the CD&A that such a review has been completed. To the extent that limiting incentives to take excessive risk is now part of the compensation landscape, compensation committees of public companies, whether or not they are EESA participants, may consider it advisable to perform risk analysis of this nature. If compensation committees take risk into account when establishing compensation, that fact must be disclosed in the CD&A. As John White, Director of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance, said in a speech this fall:

Would it be prudent for compensation committees, when establishing targets and creating incentives, not only to discuss how hard or how easy it is to meet the incentives, but also to consider the particular risks an executive might be incentivized to take to meet the target — with risk, in this case, being viewed in the context of the enterprise as a whole?... [T]o the extent that such considerations are or become a material part of a company's compensation policies or decisions, a company would be required to discuss them as part of its CD&A, available at http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2008/spch102108jww.htm.

EESA also addresses clawback policies to recover bonus compensation that is based on materially inaccurate financial statements, limitations on severance payments to senior executive and limitations on deductions on federal income tax deductions for compensation paid to senior executive officers. While many companies already address these topics in their CD&A, the publicity surrounding the EESA requirements makes it prudent for public companies, even non-EESA participants, to review and expand their explanations and analyses of these subjects.

CD&A Generally

The CD&A is intended as the centerpiece of a public company's executive compensation disclosure. As such, it merits careful consideration and should be updated each year to reflect the principles that the compensation committee applied when setting compensation decisions for that year. To the extent that current market conditions have affected, or are anticipated to affect, compensation decisions, that needs to be explained and analyzed. This is in addition to the influence, if any, of specific EESA requirements. For example, if stock performance conditions to existing awards have been waived, or if stock performance measures are being applied differently either for year-end 2008 or future awards, the waivers or changes should be explained in the CD&A. If a compensation committee changes the way it allocates incentive compensation between cash and equity awards in light of current market conditions, or for any other reason, the CD&A should discuss the rationale for the new approach. If additional retirement programs are established for named executive officers in response to lowered retirement accounts caused by the unprecedented stock market decline, the CD&A should explain the reasons why such action was taken.

In October 2007, the SEC staff issued a report based on its review of the first year of disclosure for 350 companies under the revised SEC compensation rules, available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/execcompdisclosure.htm. A principal theme of this report was that the SEC staff wants the CD&A to focus on how and why a company arrives at specific executive compensation decisions and policies. The summary of comments described in the October 2007 report is still relevant today. Re-reading this report before drafting 2008 executive compensation disclosure provides a good refresher as to what the SEC is seeking with respect to the CD&A disclosure.

In the speech quoted above, John White highlighted the three most commented upon aspects of the CD&A in SEC review:

  • Analysis,
  • Performance targets, and
  • Benchmarking.

Companies preparing their 2008 CD&A should be responsive to the concerns that the SEC has raised in each of these areas.

Analysis. According to John White, the SEC staff, in its second year of reviewing CD&A disclosure, commented heavily on the need for companies to provide more analysis with respect to:

  • The material elements of their compensation;
  • How they arrive at the varying levels of compensation; and
  • Why they believe their compensation practices and decisions fit within their overall objectives and philosophy.

The SEC staff, in its comment process, has been encouraging companies to provide explanations for each of the specific factors that their compensation committees considered to be material when approving particular components of compensation, and to place those decisions in context. The staff has been pushing for analysis of the reasons why the company believes that its specific compensation decisions are appropriate in light of the various factors that the committee considered. The staff also is seeking analysis on how determinations with respect to one element of compensation impacted other compensation decisions and why such decisions were made.

Performance Targets. Many of the comments that the SEC issued on executive compensation during the last year related to performance targets. When the CD&A discloses that performance targets were used in setting compensation but does not disclose the target levels, the SEC staff asks the company to justify the omission and provide a legal analysis of the reasons why the company believes that disclosure would result in competitive harm, which is the only basis for omission of performance targets that are material to compensation decisions. If a company determines that it is not required to provide quantitative goals, it should clearly explain how qualitative judgments on performance result in payment decisions. Additionally, the company must include a discussion of how difficult the performance targets are to achieve.

Benchmarking. If a company sets a material element of compensation through benchmarking, the CD&A must identify the peer group used for this purpose and explain the basis for the compensation committee's selection of this peer group. In addition, the CD&A must discuss how the benchmarked data were used, as well as the relationship of the data to the actual compensation granted. This detailed benchmarking disclosure is important for providing investors with an understanding of the extent to which the company is setting compensation to remain competitive with a peer group.

Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations

In July 2008, the Division of Corporation Finance consolidated various interpretations of Regulation S-K into a single set of Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations of Regulation S-K, including issues concerning tabular and narrative executive compensation disclosure that appear in proxy statements, available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/regs-kinterp.htm. Many of the interpretations appearing in this guidance remain unchanged from the prior telephone interpretations that the SEC staff has published. However, there are some modified positions and some new interpretations. Therefore, it is useful to consult this consolidated collection of SEC guidance when preparing proxy disclosure for the upcoming proxy season.

For example,

  • Question 118.05 clarifies that for the purpose of preparing CD&A disclosure, compensation benchmarking generally entails using compensation data about other companies as a reference point from which to base, justify or provide a framework for a compensation decision, rather than considering a broad-based third-party survey to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices.
  • Question 118.06 specifies that the role a compensation consultant plays in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation is to be disclosed as part of the compensation committee disclosure. If the consultant plays a material role in compensation-setting practices and decisions, that role must be discussed in the CD&A.
  • Question 119.07 specifies if an executive officer has fully reimbursed the company for any item, that item is not considered a perquisite or other personal benefit and does not need to be separately identified by type. It is important to note that full reimbursement may likely be different from incremental cost in determining the value of a perquisite for disclosure purposes.
  • Question 119.12 addresses the determination of who should be included as the named executive officers for the last completed fiscal year where there has been a reversal of previously expensed equity awards. If a previously expensed amount would have been reported in the summary compensation table had the executive been included in that table during the year in which the award was expensed, the reversal of that expense may be considered in determining whether such executive officer is a named executive officer.
  • Question 119.15 addresses the disclosure of assumptions made in the valuation of stock and option awards in the summary compensation table by reference to a discussion of those assumptions in the registrant's financial statements, footnotes and Management's Discussion and Analysis, specifying that it is not sufficient to reference financial statements (or associated footnotes) that contain only assumptions for the company's grants during the most recent fiscal year if awards granted in prior fiscal years were recognized during the most recent fiscal year.

The above is not intended as a summary of all new and revised positions taken by the SEC staff in the Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations, but as a reminder of the importance of this resource to resolve questions that arise when preparing compensation disclosure.

Learn more about our Corporate & Securities practice.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities ("Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; and JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia. The Mayer Brown Practices are known as Mayer Brown JSM in Asia.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Copyright 2008. Mayer Brown LLP, Mayer Brown International LLP, and/or JSM. All rights reserved.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions