United States: NAIC Updates – June 2018

Model Regulation #275

The Annuity Suitability (A) Working Group of the NAIC Life Insurance and Annuities (A) Committee held an open meeting on Saturday, March 24, 2018 during the NAIC 2018 Spring National Meeting in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The meeting centered on proposed revisions to the Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation #275 ("Model #275") which had been introduced at the NAIC 2017 Fall National Meeting and included a "best interests" standard designed to comport with U.S. Department of Labor's ("DOL") fiduciary rule. Model #275 was adopted to "set standards and procedures for suitable annuity recommendations, and to require insurers to establish a system to supervise recommendations so that the insurance needs and financial objectives of consumers are appropriately addressed." A recent federal circuit court decision has undermined the DOL fiduciary rule raising questions in the Working Group regarding the viability of its proposed revisions to Model #275.

Federal Circuit Court Decisions Affecting DOL Fiduciary Rule

The meeting commenced with a legal analysis provided by Jennifer McAdam of the NAIC of two United States Courts of Appeal decisions impacting the DOL's fiduciary rule (the "Federal Court Decisions"). McAdams explained that the first decision, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. United States Department of Labor, issued by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals struck the DOL fiduciary rule in its entirety. According to McAdam, the Fifth Circuit ruled that, (1) the DOL did not possess authority to adopt the new definition of "fiduciary advice" as it was inconsistent with the text of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"); and (2) the DOL had acted arbitrarily and capriciously when enacting the fiduciary rule in violation of the federal Administrative Procedures Act ("APA").

McAdams next discussed the second decision, Market Synergy Group v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, issued by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals two days before the Fifth Circuit decision. In Market Synergy, McAdams explained, the plaintiffs contended that the DOL fiduciary rule violated the APA by: (1) failing to provide sufficient notice of its intention to exclude transactions involving fixed indexed annuities (FIA) from the Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE); (2) arbitrarily and capriciously handling FIAs disparately than other fixed annuities by eliminating them from PTE; and (3) failing to sufficiently consider the negative economic effect of its exclusions of FIAs from the PTE. McAdams stated that the Tenth Circuit disagreed with Plaintiffs and upheld part of the DOL fiduciary rule.

McAdams has advised that the DOL was currently considering its options in light of these decisions and was not enforcing the fiduciary rule pending further review.

Stakeholder Comments on the Federal Court Decisions' Effect on Model Regulation #275

The American Council of Life Insurers ("ACLI") has remained committed to developing appropriately tailored rules for annuity sellers to protect consumers. The group is interested in moving forward through a coordinated effort among the NAIC, regulators, state legislators, the DOL and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA"). ACLI seeks a "common sense best interests standard" for annuities, which it believes should be achieved by improving Model Regulation #275 in the following key areas: (1) establishing a process-oriented approach to determining what is in the best interests of the consumers; and (2) identifying and disclosing conflicts of interest regarding cash and non-cash compensation. ACLI has also advised that its president has reached out to the SEC to emphasize the importance of working with state regulators to create a best interests standard of care for annuities. ACLI believes that the NAIC should work with the SEC in connection with the SEC's proposed rule.

The Insured Retirement Institute ("IRI") has expressed its agreement with ACLI's comments and its belief that producers already operate in their clients' best interests. The DOL rule did not recognize this according to the IRI. IRI has suggested that, as the Working Group revises Model #275, it target areas that need enhancement and ensure that there are a wide variety of consumer choices/products. The IRI has implored that the Federal Court Decisions free the Working Group to decide where appropriate changes need to be made.

The American Banks Association ("ABA") has expressed its concerns that the proposed revisions to Model Regulation #275 will unsettle the current annuity marketplace and likely remove banks from offering annuity products, which will negatively affect consumers. According to the ABA, the Model currently incorporates standards that are applied to security sellers, which are too onerous on banks. The ABA has contended that, if the revisions are adopted, Model #275 will create increased litigation and inconsistent compliance requirements for banks across jurisdictions.

The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors ("NAIFA") has advised that its representatives have met with the SEC regarding the SEC's proposed rule. NAIFA believes that the NAIC should wait for the SEC so that its model rule can conform to the SEC rule. NAIFA has stated that it supports a best interests standard and has reiterated that NAIFA members have relationships with consumers; thus, annuity sales are driven by that relationship and not by the producer compensation structure. NAIFA has stressed that any approach taken by the NAIC cannot impair the low and middle market consumers' capacity to obtain these products.

Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America ("IIABA") has welcomed the Fifth Circuit Decision striking down the DOL fiduciary rule - which the IIABA deems "very troubling" - and has expressed that the Fifth Circuit Decision allows the Working Group to pause and reset. Before the Decision, the Working Group's goal, according to IIABA, was to create a Model that was uniform with the DOL rule. The IIABA has contended that now, the Working Group can reassess this goal. The IIABA believes that the best interests standard is too vague and does not provide sufficient direction to brokers and agents. NAIC has an opportunity to provide more defined guidance.

Reinsurance Provisions of the Covered Agreement Between EU and U.S.

The NAIC Reinsurance (E) Task Force ("RTF") held an open meeting on Sunday, March 25, 2018 during the NAIC 2018 Spring National Meeting in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. During the meeting, the RTF focused on the reinsurance provisions of the Agreement Between the European Union and the United States of America on Prudential Measures Regarding Insurance and Reinsurance ("Covered Agreement"), which was executed by the United States and the European Union on September 22, 2017. The Covered Agreement will "eliminate reinsurance requirements for EU reinsurers that maintain a minimum amount of own funds equivalent to $250 million and a solvency capital ratio (SCR) of 100% under Solvency II," and allow U.S. reinsurers to do business in the EU without local presence so long as they "maintain capital and surplus equivalent to €226 million with an RBC of 300% of Authorized Control Level." The Covered Agreement requires U.S. states to implement rules that comport with the Covered Agreement within 60 months or risk pre-emption by the federal government.

NAIC To Revise Models To Extend Covered Agreement's Reinsurance Collateral Requirements to Non-EU Qualified Jurisdictions

On February 20, 2018, the NAIC held a public hearing in New York to address the reinsurance collateral provisions of the Covered Agreement. Commissioners McPeak and Altmaier and Superintendent Vullo presided over the meeting, which was attended by approximately 160 people and by another 181 participating by conference call. During the public hearing, 18 speakers - including a representative from the U.S. Department of Treasury, several U.S. domestic insurers and U.S. trade associations, international reinsurers and international trade associations - provided testimony regarding the collateral requirements. The NAIC also received twenty (20) comment letters from various stakeholders and interested parties.

As a result of the hearing, the NAIC has determined that industry consensus favors extending the benefits of the reinsurance collateral requirements of the Covered Agreement to reinsurers in non-EU qualified jurisdictions (Bermuda, Japan, Switzerland and, after Brexit, the UK). However, industry representatives have made it clear that they support this initiative only if the non-EU reinsurers are required to treat the states in the same manner and with the same recognition as do the EU states. This specifically includes a mandate that the non-EU reinsurers recognize the states' approach to group supervision, including group capital.

As such, the commissioner group presiding over the February meeting has drafted a memorandum to the NAIC Financial Condition (E) Committee recommending that it adopt a request for NAIC Model Law Development to amend the Credit for Reinsurance Model Law (#785) and the Credit for Reinsurance Model Regulation (#786) so that those Models both conform to the Covered Agreement's collateral requirements and bestow reinsurers domiciled in non-EU qualified jurisdictions the same or similar reinsurance collateral requirements. In so doing, the commissioners have recommended that the Committee direct NAIC staff to draft the proposed amendments for the RTF's review.

The commissioner group has also advised the Committee to adopt charges to the RTF to (1) revise Model #785 and Model #786 to conform to the Covered Agreement; and (2) design amendments to those Models that authorize non-EU reinsurers domiciled in Qualified Jurisdictions to follow the same or similar reinsurance collateral requirements as set forth in the Covered Agreement. Based on comments and testimony received during the public hearing, the commissioners have asked that the charge mandate that any changes to Model #785 and Model #786 require these reinsurers to be bound by all other constraints imposed upon the EU in the Covered Agreement, including the mandate that the Qualified Jurisdiction agree to recognize the state's approach to group supervision, including group capital. The RTF will be directed to convene with international regulators, as well as other interested parties, to ensure they will abide by this approach.

The commissioner group has also recommended that Financial Condition (E) Committee adopt charges to the Qualified Jurisdiction (E) Working Group to require qualified jurisdictions to recognize fundamental NAIC solvency enterprises, including group supervision, group capital standards as well as mandate increased information sharing between the states and Qualified Jurisdictions so that reinsurers domiciled in those jurisdictions are treated no differently than EU reinsurers under the Covered Agreement.

To view the full article, please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions