United States: Yahoo Settlement Changes SEC Expectations On Cyber Disclosure

Last Updated: June 11 2018
Article by Joseph V. Moreno, Kyle DeYoung, Keith M. Gerver, Alexander Hokenson and Stephen Weiss

Most Read Contributor in United States, October 2018

Public companies should not expect that the SEC will wait for a similarly egregious case to bring future cybersecurity disclosure enforcement actions, attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP write.

In its long-awaited, first-ever enforcement action against a public company for failing to disclose a data breach, the Securities and Exchange Commission recently imposed a $35 million civil money penalty against Altaba Inc. (formerly known as Yahoo! Inc.) alleging that the internet media company made materially misleading statements in its public filings by repeatedly neglecting to disclose its 2014 cyber incident to investors.

Yahoo violated Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, according to the SEC's order, by failing to disclose its 2014 data breach in numerous quarterly, annual, and periodic reports over the subsequent two years, and for failing to maintain controls that ensured the breach would be evaluated for potential public disclosure.

The Yahoo data breach involved several factors that made it particularly serious, including a sophisticated cyberattack conducted by Russian hackers and the loss of more than 500 million users' personal information, known according to an SEC press release as Yahoo's ''crown jewels'' (usernames, email addresses, telephone numbers, birth dates, passwords, and security answers). Further, Yahoo's internal security team and senior management knew about the intrusion, but the company failed to adequately investigate the breach or publicly disclose it for nearly two years. Such a reporting delay portrayed the company in a particularly bad light with regulators.

However, public companies should not expect that the SEC will wait for another similarly egregious case to bring future cybersecurity disclosure enforcement actions and should instead take this opportunity to understand the SEC's expectations for cybersecurity risk and incident disclosures in public filings going forward.

2011 Cyber Disclosure Guidance

The SEC's Division of Corporation Finance issued guidance in October 2011 on reporting obligations for public companies regarding cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents.

The disclosure guidance recognized that the growing reliance of public companies on digital technologies meant that cybersecurity-related risks and events could be sufficiently material to investors such that they may be required to be disclosed in registration statements, financial statements, and other public filings. As a result, it called for public companies to review, on an ongoing basis, the adequacy of their disclosure policies relating to cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents, along with other operational and financial risks.

  • Cybersecurity Risks. The disclosure guidance suggested that companies should disclose the risk of cyber incidents if these issues are ''among the most significant factors that make an investment in the company risky.'' In determining whether to report any cybersecurity risks, companies should consider, among other things: (i) the probability of a cybersecurity incident occurring; (ii) the potential magnitude and costs associated with the risk; (iii) prior cybersecurity incidents; and (iv) the adequacy of possible preventative measures. The disclosure guidance cautioned against ''boilerplate'' disclosures and, instead, advised that companies tailor the discussion of their specific cybersecurity risks. It emphasized, however, that companies need not disclose information that would, in itself, compromise its ability to defend against cyberattacks.
  • Cyber Incidents. The disclosure guidance also set forth a number of considerations regarding the disclosure of cyber incidents, including whether: (i) the incident will have a material effect on the company's financial condition; (ii) material intellectual property was stolen; (iii) the cyber incident materially affected products, services, or customer relationships; and (iv) the company has been subject to prior data breaches. A company should also consider the impact of remediation costs for stolen assets and information, repairs to internal systems that hackers may have compromised, and the necessity of engaging outside firms to assist with breach response and remediation.

2018 SEC Enhancements

The SEC issued interpretive guidance in February for the stated purpose of not replacing but ''reinforcing and expanding upon'' the disclosure guidance. To that effect, it adds detail to several topics, including:

  • Materiality Standard. In determining how general disclosure obligations under federal securities laws apply to cybersecurity, companies should weigh, among other things, the potential materiality of any identified cybersecurity risk and, in the case of cyber incidents, the importance of any compromised information and of the impact of the cyber incident on the company's operations. The materiality of cybersecurity risks or cyber incidents depends on their nature, extent, and potential magnitude, as well as on the range of harm that such incidents could cause to the company's reputation, financial performance, and customer and vendor relationships, and to the possibility of litigation or regulatory actions. In emphasizing that public companies must disclose cybersecurity risks and incidents that are material to investors, the SEC reiterated that companies are not obligated to make disclosures that are so detailed they could compromise the company's cybersecurity efforts. The SEC also emphasized that while an internal investigation may be necessary to ascertain the extent of an incident's materiality, it cannot be used as an excuse to unduly delay disclosures to the investing public.
  • Risk Factors. In disclosing significant factors that make investments in the company's securities speculative or risky, companies should disclose the risks associated with cybersecurity and cybersecurity incidents, including those that arise in connection with acquisitions. In evaluating such disclosures, the SEC suggests a number of factors to consider, including the occurrence of prior incidents; the probability of occurrence and potential magnitude of incidents; the adequacy of preventative actions taken; costs; the potential for reputational harm; and the impact of laws, regulations, and litigation.
  • Management Discussions and Analysis. The cost of ongoing cybersecurity efforts, the costs and other consequences of cybersecurity incidents, and the risks of potential cybersecurity incidents, among other matters, could inform a company's analysis and discussion of its financial condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations.
  • Description of Business. Companies should disclose if cybersecurity incidents or risks materially affect a company's products, services, relationships with customers or suppliers, or competitive conditions.
  • Legal Proceedings. Companies should note that the requirement to disclose information relating to material pending legal proceedings includes any proceedings that relate to cybersecurity issues.
  • Financial Statement Disclosures. Companies should ensure that their financial reporting and control systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information about the range and magnitude of the financial impacts of a cybersecurity incident would be incorporated into its financial statements on a timely basis as the information becomes available.
  • Board Risk Oversight. To the extent that cybersecurity risks are material to a company's business, any discussion of how the company's board of directors administers its risk oversight function should include the nature of its role in overseeing cybersecurity risk.

In addition, the 2018 interpretive guidance touches on several additional topics of interest:

  • Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The 2018 guidance emphasizes the importance of companies maintaining comprehensive policies and procedures related to cybersecurity risks and incidents. Compliance with such policies and procedures should be assessed regularly, including the sufficiency of their disclosure controls and procedures as they relate to cybersecurity disclosure. This includes whether relevant information about cybersecurity risks and incidents is processed and reported up the corporate ladder.
  • Correcting and Updating Prior Disclosures. The 2018 guidance also reminded companies that they may have a duty to correct previous disclosures which they later determine to be untrue or misleading. Companies may also have a duty to update previous disclosures that, while accurate at the time of disclosure, have become materially inaccurate since they were made.
  • Insider Trading. The new guidance also noted that companies should consider how their codes of ethics and insider trading policies take into account and prevent trading on the basis of material nonpublic information related to cybersecurity risk and incidents. In addition, companies should consider whether and when it may be appropriate to implement restrictions on insider trading while significant cybersecurity incidents are being investigated and assessed. The SEC also noted that companies must ensure compliance with Regulation FD with respect to not selectively disclosing material non-public information regarding cybersecurity risks and incidents to insiders before making full disclosure of that same information to the general public.

Conclusion

The SEC's action against Yahoo is its first enforcement action against a company for failing to disclose a cyber breach, and it involved egregious conduct. The details and scope of the Yahoo action may provide insight into how the SEC will evaluate other data breach disclosures, including Equifax's September 2017 data breach disclosure and possibly Facebook's disclosures related to the Cambridge Analytica scandal. Equifax waited approximately five weeks to disclose its breach, where hackers stole Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, and driver's license numbers for approximately 143 million individuals, in addition to credit card numbers for more than 200,000 others. The SEC's review of Equifax will likely take into account the weeks-long delay in reporting the cyber incident, as well as the materiality of the breach, how and when Equifax investigated the breach, and company executives allegedly using confidential information to sell stock before publicly disclosing the breach. Similarly, Facebook reportedly waited years before disclosing the incident where Cambridge Analytica inappropriately collected the personal information of up to 87 million users. Although the Facebook incident may not have been a technical data breach, the SEC will likely look closely at the delay in reporting the incident, the materiality of the incident, and how Facebook responded when it learned of the incident.

Public companies may be tempted to look at the egregious nature of the Yahoo breach and believe the bar is high for future disclosure actions, but that may be short-sighted because companies are now on notice as to what the SEC expects in public disclosures. In-house counsel and compliance professionals are strongly advised to familiarize themselves with the SEC cybersecurity risk and incident disclosure expectations, and ensure they have adequate cybersecurity policies, procedures, and internal controls in place to help make sure their public disclosure obligations are met.

Originally published by Privacy and Security Law Report, Bloomberg Law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions