Seventh Circuit: SEC Lacks Jurisdiction To Adjudicate Certain Disputes Between Securities Firms And Exchanges

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld the SEC's determination that the agency did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate certain claims brought by securities firms against several securities exchanges.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (the "Seventh Circuit") upheld the SEC's determination that the agency did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate certain claims brought by securities firms (the "Market Makers") against several securities exchanges. The Court stated: "The precise question before the SEC was whether it had jurisdiction over a petition brought by private parties seeking damages for an alleged rule violation" (at p.8).

The Market Makers alleged that they had been charged in error by the Chicago Board Options Exchange ("CBOE") and Nasdaq (collectively, the "Exchanges") for fees under Payment for Order Flow programs. The Market Makers filed a petition with the SEC, requesting that the agency force the Exchanges to (i) "provide a full accounting" of all improperly charged fees and (ii) "award damages in that amount, or in the alternative, order disgorgement of the improperly charged fees." The SEC denied the petition on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction, stating that:

  • the petition did not allege that the Exchanges had denied or limited access to any service, as required under Exchange Act Section 19(d);
  • the SEC is not authorized to adjudicate claims against the Exchanges by private parties, such as the Market Makers, under Exchange Act Section 19(h)(1);
  • although the SEC is permitted to impose civil penalties and seek disgorgement in certain actions, it is not authorized to award damages in private actions; and
  • the fact that the dispute involved an SEC rule does not necessarily provide the SEC with jurisdiction.

The CBOE appealed the SEC's decision to the Seventh Circuit, seeking an order that the SEC could exercise jurisdiction over the Market Makers' claims. Although it recognized that the Exchanges had the standing to appeal because the SEC's decision resulted in an "adverse effect in fact" for the Exchanges, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the SEC's determination. The Seventh Circuit explained that the Exchange Act does not speak to whether the SEC can adjudicate a private party billing dispute seeking damages. According to the Seventh Circuit, the SEC's determination that the Exchange Act did not provide it with jurisdiction over such a dispute was reasonable and, therefore, entitled to deference.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More