Principles Of Antitrust Causation Are Alive And Well[Butrin]: Why The Third Circuit Got It Right

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Correctly interpreting Supreme Court precedent, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit made clear in its decision In re Wellbutrin Antitrust Litigation that, in a reverse payment case, to establish antitrust...
United States Antitrust/Competition Law

Correctly interpreting Supreme Court precedent, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit made clear in its decision In re Wellbutrin Antitrust Litigation that, in a reverse payment case, to establish antitrust injury, private plaintiffs must show that it was more likely than not that a non-infringing generic product would have entered earlier absent the settlement agreement.

To view the full article click here

Originally published by Antitrust & Trade Regulation Report, Bloomberg Law 16 March 2018.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More