ARTICLE
16 March 2018

English Court Clarifies Test For Forseeability Risk

CL
Cooley LLP

Contributor

Cooley LLP logo
Clients partner with Cooley on transformative deals, complex IP and regulatory matters, and high-stakes litigation, where innovation meets the law. Cooley has nearly 1,400 lawyers across 18 offices in the United States, Asia and Europe, and a total workforce of more than 3,000.
The ruling provides food for thought to those managing new risks.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The ruling provides food for thought to those managing new risks.



The English Court of Appeal has taken another look at the question of foreseeability risk, again in the context of asbestos-related disease. These cases are important for companies innovating in new technologies, because they give valuable insight into the expectations for how a company should manage its activities when dealing with an area of uncertain or unmeasurable risk. In this case the court considered whether the applicable standard was set by a guidance document published by the government around the relevant time, or whether the right approach is to look at the broader circumstances, including the knowledge of the reasonable company at the time. The court concluded that the latter "more nuanced approach" was the correct route.

Our colleague Richard Hopley considers the judgment in Bussey v Anglia Heating ([2018] EWCA Civ.243, 22 February 2018)  here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More