United States: Supreme Court Narrows Definition Of A Whistleblower Under Dodd-Frank To Require Reporting To SEC

On February 21, 2018, the Supreme Court in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers1 narrowly construed the definition of "whistleblower" in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ("Dodd-Frank" or the "Act") and, consequently, who qualifies for the anti-retaliation protections afforded by the Act. The Court interpreted Dodd-Frank narrowly, holding that a whistleblower is entitled to the anti-retaliation protections of the Act only if he or she reports alleged securities law violations directly to the SEC. As a result, an employee is entitled to no anti-retaliation protections if he or she only reports such purported violations internally, utilizing the employer's internal compliance processes. To date, most whistleblowers have utilized their employers' internal processes rather than going directly to the SEC. While in the short term Digital Realty will likely result in a reduction in the number of employees who can claim whistleblower protection under Dodd-Frank, in the longer run the decision will likely increase the number of employees who opt to bypass their employers' internal reporting mechanisms and instead directly report what they perceive to be securities law violations to the SEC. The likely result will be an increase in the number of law enforcement investigations of alleged corporate misconduct.2

At issue in Digital Realty was the definition of "whistleblower" under Section 922 of Dodd-Frank. The Act defines "whistleblower" as any individual who provides "information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the [Securities and Exchange] Commission."3 (bracketed insertion ours). In 2011, the SEC issued Rule 21F-2, which disregarded this definition with respect to the Act's anti-retaliation provisions—providing that an individual is a whistleblower "[f]or purposes of the anti-retaliation protections" if he or she either reports information regarding purported securities law violations to the SEC directly or reports such violations internally pursuant to the whistleblower provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.4 As such, Rule 21F-2 expanded the statutory definition of a whistleblower under Dodd-Frank to include employees who reported internally and did not report to the SEC. A circuit split soon emerged over the applicable definition of a whistleblower. The Fifth Circuit5 relied on the statutory definition to find that a whistleblower must report to the SEC in order to avail him- or herself of the anti-retaliation provisions, while the Second6 and Ninth7 Circuits deferred to the definition in SEC Rule 21F-2, holding that a whistleblower is protected if he or she discloses internally, even if he or she does not disclose to the SEC.

The Supreme Court's decision in Digital Realty arose from the defendant's appeal of the Ninth Circuit's decision, which deferred to the SEC's definition. Somers worked for Digital Realty from 2010 to 2014, and claimed that Digital Realty terminated him only after he reported potential violations of the securities laws internally to company management. Somers did not provide this information to the SEC. He subsequently brought a whistleblower retaliation claim under Dodd-Frank against Digital Realty for his termination. The company moved to dismiss the claim on the grounds that Somers did not qualify as a whistleblower under Dodd-Frank because he had not reported the alleged securities law violations to the SEC. The district court denied the motion, reasoning that the whistleblower provisions under Dodd-Frank were ambiguous and, as a result, the SEC's broader Rule 21F-2, which accorded protection to internal reports, was entitled to Chevron deference. The Ninth Circuit affirmed, concluding that adoption of the statutory definition of whistleblower, as the company urged, would narrow the anti-retaliation provisions to protect only employees that report possible violations of securities laws both internally and to the SEC, which was unlikely to occur.

The Supreme Court reversed unanimously, with two concurrences, relying on two primary grounds. First, the Court pointed to the explicit statutory language of Dodd-Frank, noting that the specific text of the statute defined a whistleblower as someone who reported to the SEC, and the statutory definition of whistleblower applied to govern the anti-retaliation provisions under the Act.8 The Court also reasoned that Congress must have intended to use a government-reporting requirement because it incorporated such a requirement into the whistleblower definition but not elsewhere in the statute. Second, the Court relied on the legislative intent, holding that the "core objective" of Dodd-Frank was "to prompt reporting to the SEC"9 Construing Dodd-Frank's definition of whistleblower strictly furthered that goal, even if it narrowed the field of eligible employees. Since Congress had directly spoken to the precise question before it, the Court saw no need to accord deference to a contrary view adopted by the SEC in Rule 21F-2.

Digital Realty is the latest in a string of Supreme Court cases that have narrowed the SEC's enforcement capabilities. In the 2013 decision Gabelli v. S.E.C.,10 the Court declined to apply the discovery rule when determining under 28 USC section 2462 when the limitations period for civil money penalties began to run. In 2017, the Court further limited the SEC's enforcement power in Kokesh v. S.E.C.,11 where it held that SEC ordered disgorgement was subject to the five-year statute of limitations under 28 USC section 2462. These decisions, in conjunction with Digital Realty, indicate that the Court does not, and will not, shy away from limiting the SEC's power when it deviates too far from the applicable statutory language or legislative intent.

While the decision in Digital Realty may undercut the SEC's enforcement program in the short term, that probably will not be the case long-term. As noted above, the majority of whistleblowers historically have reported only internally. Going forward, however, Digital Realty will incentivize employees to report directly to the SEC and bypass corporate internal compliance programs. Such compliance programs have historically provided companies with the opportunity to become aware of and internally investigate potential securities laws violations prior to an SEC investigation and prepare accordingly. They have also given companies an opportunity to implement remedial measures if necessary so that if the company decides to self-report, it can present a complete package. The decision underscores how important it is for companies to develop and maintain compliance programs to ensure conformity with the applicable securities laws and limit potential violations that can be reported. Adopting and implementing a robust compliance program can help a company adhere to legal requirements and identify issues so it can address them before they manifest into a legal liability.

For more information concerning this alert or other recent developments regarding Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, please contact us using the information provided in the upper right under "Key Contacts."


1. Digital Realty Tr., Inc. v. Somers, No. 16-1276, 2018 WL 987345 (U.S. Feb. 21, 2018).

2. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act's statutory definition of whistleblower will continue to protect individuals who report up the chain (as opposed to reporting to the SEC). However, Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provisions are much more expansive than those in Sarbanes-Oxley. First, under Dodd-Frank, there is no requirement for an employee to first exhaust administrative remedies, which can be a time consuming process, involving a complaint to the Department of Labor within 180 days, waiting 180 days for DOL to act, and only when it doesn't being able to file a complaint in federal court. Second, Dodd-Frank requires reinstatement, an award of double backpay, with interest, and litigation fees and costs, to a prevailing employee. Sarbanes-Oxley only authorizes reinstatement, backpay and fees and costs. Finally, Dodd-Frank extends the statute of limitations from Sarbanes-Oxley's 180 days to a default limitation period of six years.

3. 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6 (a)(6).

4. 17 C.F.R. § 240.21F-2; 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6 (a)(6), (b)(1); 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(A)..

5. Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA), L.L.C., 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013).

6. Berman v. Neo@Ogilvy LLC, 801 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2015)

7. Somers v. Digital Realty Tr. Inc., 850 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2017).

8. 2018 WL 987345, at *8.

9. 2018 WL 987345, at *9, *12.

10. 568 U.S. 442, 133 S. Ct. 1216 (2013).

11. 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
22 Jan 2019, Seminar, San Francisco, United States

Dentons is pleased to offer a full day of classes, just in time for the California MCLE compliance period deadline of January 31, 2019.*

23 Jan 2019, Seminar, Los Angeles, United States

Dentons is pleased to offer a full day of classes, just in time for the California MCLE compliance period deadline of January 31, 2019.*

24 Jan 2019, Other, New York, United States

Join Dentons’ Health Care Partner Lori Mihalich-Levin and White Collar & Government Investigations Counsel Christine Genaitis as they lead conference sessions at AHLA Academic Medical Centers and Teaching Hospitals Institute.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions