Can Trump Save Coal Without Killing All The Miners?

FH
Foley Hoag LLP

Contributor

Foley Hoag provides innovative, strategic legal services to public, private and government clients. We have premier capabilities in the life sciences, healthcare, technology, energy, professional services and private funds fields, and in cross-border disputes. The diverse experiences of our lawyers contribute to the exceptional senior-level service we deliver to clients.
Last month, the New York Times reported on the identification of the largest cluster of advanced black lung cases ever reported. (And lest you think that this is fake news...
United States Energy and Natural Resources

Last month, the New York Times reported on the identification of the largest cluster of advanced black lung cases ever reported.  (And lest you think that this is fake news, the Times contains a link to the article, which was a Research Letter published by the Journal of the American Medical Association, that known collection of left-wing zealots.)  Here's the sobering summary from one of the authors:

There's an unacceptably large number of younger miners who have end-stage disease and the only choice is to get a lung transplant or wait it out and die.

Apparently, the increase stems from changes in mining operations that have led to increased exposures to Silica dust.  We'll see if this study has any impact on the Trump administration's review of the 2014 coal dust rule promulgated by the Obama Administration.

It may be necessary to destroy all the miners in order to save coal mining.

To view Foley Hoag's Law and the Environment Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More