ARTICLE
28 February 2018

SEC Files Complaint Against Cryptocurrency Exchange For Misappropriating Funds And Misleading Investors

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The SEC filed a Complaint against Jon E. Montroll and BitFunder.com for operating an unregistered securities exchange, defrauding exchange users by misappropriating their funds, and failing to disclose a cyberattack on their system.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

The SEC filed a Complaint against Jon E. Montroll ("Mr. Montroll") and BitFunder.com ("BitFunder" and, collectively, the "Defendants") for operating an unregistered securities exchange, defrauding exchange users by misappropriating their funds, and failing to disclose a cyberattack on their system. The alleged fraud resulted in the theft of more than 6,000 bitcoins.

The Complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Manhattan. As alleged, Mr. Montroll operated BitFunder, an unregistered securities exchange that allowed users to create, offer and sell digital assets that were actually shares in various enterprises that offered dividends. Mr. Montroll also operated WeExchange, an Australian virtual currency exchange providing digital wallets. Traders on BitFunder were required to use WeExchange to hold bitcoin for use as the sole source of payments on BitFunder. From December 2012 through November 2013, Mr. Montroll allegedly mixed BitFunder users' bitcoins in the WeExchange without their knowledge or consent. In the summer of 2013, unidentified individual(s) "hacked" into Mr. Montroll's site and withdrew approximately 6,000 bitcoins from WeExchange, which converts to roughly $60 million. Mr. Montroll allegedly did not alert his users or the public to this incident and, according to the SEC, misled investors and users since that time stating that BitFunder was profitable while operating on a bitcoin deficit.

Based upon evidence collected during the SEC's investigation, the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office filed a separate Complaint against Mr. Montroll for perjury and obstruction of justice.

Commentary / Jeff Robins

The SEC did not allege that bitcoin are securities or that BitFunder was an illegal securities exchange because of the use of bitcoin on the exchange. Rather, bitcoin was the medium of payment for other virtual assets that were allegedly securities.

This case makes good on Chairman Clayton's warning that the SEC would take action against intermediaries facilitating trading of tokens deemed to be securities without appropriate licenses (though the fraud was clearly the main charge). Token brokers, dealers, platform operators (as well as the unnamed parties selling unregistered securities on BitFunder) should take note.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More