United States: Tax Cuts And Jobs Act Adopt Provisions To Prevent Base Erosion

Last Updated: February 5 2018
Article by Sheryl Shah and Stanley C. Ruchelman


Following the lead of the O.E.C.D. and the European Commission ("E.C."), the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("T.C.J.A.") adopts several provisions designed to end certain tax planning opportunities. Provisions such as these are often described as attacks on base erosion and profit shifting. In bygone days, the targeted plans were known as innovative. Now, they are characterized as abusive.

In some instances, the T.C.J.A. closely follows counterpart provisions recommend­ed by the O.E.C.D. and adopted by the E.C. In others, the provisions that are specific to U.S. tax law.


With the adoption of a dividends received deduction ("D.R.D."), the T.C.J.A. em­braces a provision that prevents large U.S.-based groups from reducing U.S. tax through base eroding payments only to have these payments return to the U.S. in a tax-free manner under the D.R.D. The new Code §951A imposes a claw-back tax on U.S. corporations that make tax reducing payments to controlled foreign corpo­rations ("C.F.C.'s"). The receipt of those payments leads the item to be included in the gross income of the C.F.C.'s "U.S. Shareholder," as defined under Broadened Scope of Subpart F below, as Global Intangible Low-Tax Income ("G.I.L.T.I."), to the extent a base amount is exceeded.1 The base amount equals 10% of the tax­payer's Qualified Business Asset Investment. The inclusion is taxed at a special low rate of 10.5%, with a foreign tax credit allowed – albeit capped at 80% of the G.I.L.T.I. This ensures that a tax of at least 10.5% will be paid on the income, and if tax is imposed abroad, a global tax of 13.5% will generally be paid.


Prior Law

Provisions designed to prevent "earnings stripping" were first adopted by the U.S. when Code §163(j) was adopted in 1989. Its goal was to prevent erosion of the U.S. tax base through excessive deductions for interest paid by a taxable corporation to a related party that was not fully taxed in the U.S. on the receipt of the income.

Under prior law, the provision disallowed a deduction for "disqualified interest" paid or accrued by a corporation in a taxable year if two threshold tests were satis­fied. First, the payor's debt-to-equity ratio exceeded 1.5 to 1.0. Second, the pay­or's net interest expense exceeded 50% of its adjusted taxable income, generally, E.B.I.T.D.A. (earnings before interest, taxes, deprecation, and amortization) with certain adjustments for tax concepts.

Disqualified interest included, inter alia, interest paid or accrued to (i) related parties outside the U.S. that were not subject to full withholding tax and (ii) unrelated parties when the obligation was guaranteed or supported by a related party. Interest ex­pense deductions disallowed under these rules could be carried forward indefinitely, and any excess limitation could be carried forward for three years.


The T.C.J.A. expands the scope of Code §163(j) so that it is no longer a provision designed to prevent base erosion through payments to related parties. It is now a provision designed to limit the use of debt to fund the acquisition of business assets and the operation of a business in the U.S.

For taxable years beginning after 2017, the deduction for business interest is limited to the sum of

  • business interest income,
  • 30% of the adjusted taxable income of the taxpayer for the taxable year, and
  • floor plan financing2 interest on loans used to finance the acquisition of motor vehicles.

For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2022, adjusted taxable income is generally computed as under prior law.3 Thereafter, ad­justed taxable income is generally equivalent to E.B.I.T. At that point, depreciation, amortization, and depletion will no longer be added back to income for purposes of determining the base on which the 30% cap is computed.

The amount of any business interest not allowed as a deduction for any taxable year may be carried forward indefinitely, subject to certain restrictions applicable to partnerships.

Business interest means any interest paid or accrued on indebtedness properly allocable to a trade or business. Any amount treated as interest for purposes of the Code is interest for purposes of the provision. Business interest income means the amount of interest includible in the gross income of the taxpayer for the taxable year that is properly allocable to a trade or business. Business interest does not include investment interest, and business interest income does not include investment income, within the meaning of Code 163(d).4

The limitation applies at the taxpayer level. Where a business is carried on through a partnership, including an L.L.C., the partners ignore their respective distributive shares of income, gain, deduction, or loss when calculating adjusted taxable in­come.5 However, a partner of a partnership may deduct additional interest expense to the extent the partnership could have deducted more business interest. The additional interest that may be claimed by each partner is computed by a formula.

Certain businesses are not covered by revised Code §163(j). These include the following:

  • Taxpayers with average annual gross receipts for a three-taxable-year peri­od, ending with the prior taxable year, that do not exceed $25 million
  • A taxpayer in the trade or business of performing services as an employee
  • An electing real property trade or business
  • An electing farming business
  • A taxpayer in the trade or business of furnishing or selling (i) electrical energy, water, or sewage disposal services, (ii) gas or steam through a local distribu­tion system, or (iii) transportation of gas or steam by pipeline, provided that in all such businesses the rates are subject to regulatory approval


Prior Law

The use of hybrid entities and hybrid transactions has been a staple of U.S. tax planners for many years.

An example of a plan involving a hybrid entity includes royalty or interest payments between C.F.C. subsidiaries in different foreign countries where both subsidiaries make elections to be disregarded entities. If the recipient of the payment is based in a low-tax or no-tax country, the payment may be deductible for the payor, subject to little or no tax for the recipient. At the same time the payment may not be viewed to be Foreign Personal Holding Company Income because it is viewed for U.S. purposes to be an internal transaction within one C.F.C.6

An example of a hybrid transaction involves a U.S.-based group with a Luxembourg holding company that issues a contingent participating equity certificate to a group member. In Luxembourg, the payment is treated as interest and is not subject to withholding tax. At the same time, the recipient of the payment takes the position that it may treat the payment as a dividend on which a D.R.D. is allowed under local law.7


Two provisions in the T.C.J.A. limit the use of hybrid transactions and entities to re­duce tax in a cross-border setting. One is Code §267A, which relates to deductions claimed for hybrid payments,8 and the other is Code §245A, which relates to the new D.R.D. provision of U.S. tax law.9

Code §267A

A deduction is disallowed for any "disqualified related party amount" that is paid or accrued pursuant to a hybrid transaction or by, or to, a hybrid entity. A disqualified related party amount is any interest or royalty paid or accrued to a related party to the extent that either of the following are true:

  • There is no corresponding inclusion to the related party under the tax law of the country of which the related party is a resident for tax purposes or is subject to tax.
  • The related party is allowed a deduction with respect to the amount under the tax law of that country.

A related party for these purposes is determined under the rules of Code §954(d)(3), which is applied to the payor as opposed to the C.F.C.

A hybrid transaction is any transaction, agreement, or instrument involving one or more payments that are treated as interest or royalties for Federal income tax pur­poses when comparable treatment is not provided to the recipient for purposes of the tax law in its country of residence (or in a country where the recipient is subject to tax).

A hybrid entity is any entity that meets either of the following conditions:

  • It is treated as fiscally transparent for Federal income tax purposes but not for purposes of the tax law of the foreign country of residence (or in a country where it is subject to tax)
  • It is treated as fiscally transparent, or is subject to tax, for purposes of the tax law of the foreign country of which the entity is resident for tax purposes but is not so treated for Federal income tax purposes.

Under an exception, a disqualified related party amount does not include any pay­ment to the extent such payment is included in the gross income of a U.S. Share­holder under Code §951(a).

Code §245A

This section provides that a hybrid dividend received by a U.S. shareholder from a C.F.C. does not qualify for the D.R.D. A hybrid dividend means an amount received from a C.F.C. that would qualify for the deduction under Code §245A except that the C.F.C. distributing the dividend received a deduction (or other tax benefit) with respect to any income, war profits, or excess profits taxes imposed by any foreign country or possession of the U.S.

A comparable provision applies in the international context when a C.F.C. receives a hybrid dividend from any other C.F.C. and the same U.S. corporation is a U.S. Shareholder of both C.F.C.'s. Where those facts exist, the hybrid dividend is treated as Subpart F income, discussed below, notwithstanding any other provision of the Code. The U.S. Shareholder is taxed on the Subpart F income inclusion.


Subpart F is applicable to C.F.C.'s and their U.S. Shareholders, as defined below. It is the principal anti-deferral regime of relevance to a U.S.-based multinational corporate group.

A C.F.C. generally is defined as any foreign corporation in which U.S. Shareholders own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) shares representing more than 50% of the corporation's voting power or value.

Under the Subpart F, U.S. Shareholders of a C.F.C. are taxed on their pro rata shares of certain C.F.C. income (referred to as Subpart F income). Subpart F in­come is included in the income of a U.S. Shareholder automatically. Thus, the tax­able event does not require the receipt of a dividend from the C.F.C. Within certain limitations, dividends that are paid by a C.F.C. in the year of an inclusion in income, or a subsequent year, are deemed to come from previously taxed earnings of the C.F.C. This means that Subpart F income is taxed on a priority basis in relation to dividends, and consequently, is not taxed when received.

With exceptions, Subpart F income generally includes passive income – dividends, capital gains, interest, and royalties – and other income that is readily movable from one taxing jurisdiction to another. Examples are foreign base company sales income – generally arising from cross border trading activities involving a related supplier or customer based in a third country – and foreign base company services income – generally income from services performed in third countries for or on be­half of a related party.

Certain rules of attribution applied to treat shares owned by one person as if owned by another. In certain circumstances shares could be attributed from shareholders to a U.S. corporation, from one family member to another, and from trusts to bene­ficiaries. Also, shares could be attributed from corporations to shareholders, from partnerships to partners, and from partners to partnerships.

Prior Law

Under prior law, a U.S. Shareholder was a U.S. person that owned shares of the foreign corporation having 10% of the voting power. U.S. persons include U.S. citizens, U.S. residents, U.S. corporations, U.S. domestic trusts or estates, and U.S. partnerships and L.L.C.'s.

Shares could not be attributed from a nonresident, noncitizen individual to a U.S. citizen or resident. Also, shares could not be attributed from a foreign corporation that is a shareholder to a U.S. corporation.

Congress became aware of a relatively simple method to decontrol a C.F.C. without imposing U.S. tax after a foreign corporation acquires a U.S.-based multinational group with foreign subsidiaries. Rather than sell the subsidiaries, the foreign parent of the U.S.-based group could invest in each of the C.F.C.'s and receive sufficient voting shares to own at least 50% of the voting power of the foreign subsidiaries. Those newly issued shares were not attributed to the U.S.-based group.

In addition, before Subpart F could apply to a C.F.C. and its U.S. Shareholders, a foreign corporation was required to be a C.F.C. for 30 days during the taxable year.


Several changes are made to broaden the circumstances in which a U.S. person can be viewed to be a U.S. Shareholder and a foreign corporation can be a C.F.C.

Change in Definition of "U.S. Shareholder"

The T.C.J.A. revises the definition of U.S. Shareholder. A U.S. person can now be a U.S. Shareholder if it owns shares representing 10% of the voting power or 10% of the value of the foreign corporation.

Attribution from Foreign Corporations

Generally, attribution from a foreign parent of stock in a foreign corporation will oc­cur only when a U.S. person actually owns shares in the foreign corporation.

To address the decontrol issue mentioned above, the law is now changed, so that the newly issued shares can be attributed to the U.S.-based group from the foreign parent. The Conference Committee report states that this change in law is intended to apply primarily to stop the use of decontrol plans. Hence, the focus on attribution when some stock is actually owned by the U.S. corporation.

Under the T.C.J.A., the pro rata share of a C.F.C.'s Subpart F income that may be taxed in the hands of a U.S. Shareholder continues to be determined based on direct or indirect ownership of the C.F.C., without application of the new downward attribution rule. In addition, the attribution rules remain unchanged for purposes of determining whether a Form 5471, Information Return of U.S. Persons with Respect to Certain Foreign Corporations, must be filed by a U.S. person.

Repeal of the 30-Day Rule

The T.C.J.A. repeals the 30-day requirement for a foreign corporation to be a C.F.C. in order for Subpart F to apply. Thus, if a foreign person owns all the shares of a for­eign corporation, and a U.S. person acquires those shares within the 29-day period ending on the last day of the C.F.C.'s year, Subpart F applies to the U.S. acquirer for that for the days of ownership within the 29-day period. This prevents the foreign corporation from disposing of its assets without U.S. tax during the 29-day period without a potential tax imposed on the U.S. Shareholder.


Prior Law

Although a U.S. taxpayer generally was not permitted to transfer certain assets to a foreign corporation without recognizing gain,10 an exception was provided for certain transfers of property for use in an active business conducted abroad.11 Certain as­sets were not covered by this exception. These assets included (i) inventory, copy­rights, or similar property; (ii) installment obligations, accounts receivable, or similar property; (iii) foreign currency or other property denominated in foreign currency; (iv) intangible property; and (v) property for which the transferor was the lessor at the time of transfer, unless the transferee is the lessee.12 If the asset transfer was part of the incorporation of a foreign branch that generated losses, gain was required to be recognized in an amount equal to the previously recognized net loss.

A separate rule applied to transfers of intangible property as part of a tax-free trans­action.13 Rather than mandating immediate gain recognition on the transfer, Code §367(d) provided that the transaction would be treated as a sale for contingent consideration based on productivity, use, or disposition of the transferred intangible property. For this purpose, intangible property was defined by reference to Code §936(h). One issue that arose was whether locally developed good will and work­force in place were items of intangible property covered by Code §367(d), as they are not among the listed items specified in Code §936(h).

This provision had many similarities with the buy-in provisions of the qualified cost sharing regulations issued under Code §482, under which related companies in various parts of the world could arrange to share intangible property development costs without the need for cross royalty payments if each participant agreed to bear its proper share of costs based on expected profits.

In recent years, the I.R.S. unilaterally attempted to expand the list of intangible property under Code §936 by asserting that foreign goodwill developed by a foreign branch and the value of a workforce in place were items of intangible property for which compensation would be required on transfer. This position was struck down by courts in Veritas v. Commr.14 and Amazon v. Commr.,15 cases involving qualified cost sharing arrangements. In Amazon, the I.R.S. also asserted that, where ap­propriate, related transfers of intangible property be valued in the aggregate if the value of the whole exceeded the sum of individual values. It also asserted that in determining whether a transaction conducted by related parties was arm's length, realistic alternatives to the chosen form of transaction had to be considered. Both arguments were rejected as inconsistent with the list of intangibles in Code §936. Although the issue was not presented before the court in Amazon, the decision implicitly invalidated Treas. Reg. §1.482-7(g)(2)(iv) regarding qualified cost sharing


The T.C.J.A. addresses the definitional and methodological issues that arose in the Veritas and Amazon cases in connection with the definition of intangible property and legislatively reverses the holdings by revising the law as follows:

  • Workforce in place, both foreign and domestic goodwill, and going concernvalue are intangible property within the meaning of Code §936(h)(3)(B).
  • Also included in covered intangible property is the residual category of "anysimilar item," the value of which is not attributable to tangible property or theservices of an individual.
  • Language at the end of Code §936(h)(3)(B) is removed, to make clear thatthe source or amount of value is not relevant in determining whether propertythat is one of the specified types of intangible property is within the scope ofthe definition.
  • The I.R.S. is granted authority to specify the method to be used to determinethe value of intangible property, both with respect to outbound restructuringsof U.S. operations and to intercompany pricing allocations. This is done byamending Code §482 and granting regulatory authority to the I.R.S. in Code§367 regarding the use of aggregate basis valuation and the application ofthe realistic alternative principle.
  • The use of the aggregate basis valuation method is required in the case oftransfers of multiple intangibles in one or more related transactions if theI.R.S. determines that an aggregate basis achieves a more reliable resultthan an asset-by-asset approach.
  • The use of the realistic alternative principle is codified when determining thetransaction value to be used with respect to intangible property transactions.The realistic alternative principle is predicated on the notion that a taxpayerwill only enter into a particular transaction if none of its realistic alternatives iseconomically preferable to the chosen transaction.
  • Existing regulations under which the I.R.S. may determine an arm's-lengthprice by reference to a transaction that is different from the transaction thatwas actually completed are ratified.

Thus, for example, assume Corporation A is the owner of intangible propertyused to manufacture a widget, and Corporation B is a controlled foreign dis­tributor. Corporation A can choose to manufacture the widget itself, or it canchoose to license the intangible property to Corporation C, a related party ina low-tax jurisdiction, which uses the intangible property to manufacture theproduct for resale to Corporation B. In testing whether the value of the intan­gible asset transfer from Corporation A to Corporation B is arm's length, theI.R.S. may compare the actual results with those in a hypothetical fact patternin which Corporation A chooses to manufacture the product itself.


A partnership is generally treated as a pass-thru entity, and its items are realized by the partners.16 A partner is required to include in its income its share of the part­nership items even if the item has not been distributed. The partner's basis in its partnership interest is increased and decreased by gains and losses, respectively. A transfer of a partnership interest does not trigger a basis adjustment unless a 754 election is made or there is a substantial built-in loss. Any adjustment made is to account for the difference between the transferee's proportionate share and basis in the interest.

Foreign persons that hold partnership interests are treated as engaged in a U.S. trade or business if the partnership is engaged in a U.S. trade or business because of its asset use or business activities.17 Consideration received by the foreign person or corporation for its interest in a U.S. real property interest held by a partnership is treated as received in exchange for such property, making it effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business.18

Prior Law

There have been conflicting rulings on the source of gain or loss from the sale or exchange of an interest in a foreign partnership engaged in U.S. trade or business.

Despite a contradictory revenue ruling, in Grecian Magnesite Mining, Industrial & Shipping Co. v. Commr.,19 the court ruled that a foreign corporation's gain on the sale of a partnership interest of a partnership engaged in a U.S. trade or business wasn't U.S.-source income or effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business.


The T.C.J.A. clarifies the confusion on whether gain or loss is effectively connected to certain interests by assuming a complete sale.

  • The gain or loss from the sale or exchange of a partnership interest will betreated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business to the extentthat the transferor would have effectively connected gain or loss had thepartnership sold all of its assets on the date of the sale or exchange. Gain orloss is allocated to partnership interests in the same way as non-separatelystated income and loss.
  • In addition, the transferee is required to withhold 10% of the amount realizedunless the transferor can certify it is not a nonresident alien or a foreigncorporation. The partnership will deduct and withhold the amount that thetransferee fails to.


Many European politicians have questioned whether the U.S. is compliant with the O.E.C.D.'s B.E.P.S. initiative. In light of the revisions to the international provisions of U.S. tax law that are discussed above, the answer appears to be, "Yes, but in an American way." Limitations have been placed on interest expense deductions, deductions for hybrid transactions have been eliminated in a deduction/no tax sce-nario, the scope of the C.F.C. laws has been broadened, and the transfer to foreign subsidiaries of profit-making opportunities can now be challenged through transfer pricing adjustments. Add to this CbC reporting for U.S.-based multinationals and F.A.T.C.A., and the U.S. appears to have followed the O.E.C.D. action plans in a stealth-like way.


1 The G.I.L.T.I. provision is discussed in greater detail in this edition of Insights in "A New Tax Regime for C.F.C.'s: Who Is G.I.L.T.I.?"

2 "Floor plan financing" is a type of short-term loan used by retailers to purchase high-cost inventory such as automobiles. These loans are often secured by the inventory purchased as collateral.

3 One of the adjustments under current law is the deduction under Code §199 for domestic production activities. This deduction is eliminated by the T.C.J.A. and is excluded from the adjustments.

4 Interest expense incurred of a taxpayer other than a corporation on a borrowing to make an investment is deductible only to the extent of interest income.

5 Similar treatment is applied to S-corporations and their shareholders.

6 Even if the entities do not elect to be treated as disregarded entities for U.S. in­come tax purposes, the payments may avoid Foreign Personal Holding Compa­ny Income characterization by reason of Code §954(c)(6), which characterizes the income of the recipient by reference to the character of the payor's income that is reduced by the payment.

7 The opportunity for dividend treatment has been curtailed in recent years under the O.E.C.D.'s B.E.P.S. initiative, the multilateral tax convention, and various E.C. directives.

8 Code §267A.

9 Code §245A.

10 Code §367(a)(1).

11 Code §3676(a)(2).

12 Code §367(a)(3)(B).

13 Code §367(d).

14 133 T.C. 297 (2009), nonacq., AOD 2010-005, 2010-49 I.R.B. (Dec. 6, 2010).

15 148 T.C. No. 8 (2017).

16Code §702.

17Code §875.

18Code §897(a) and (g).

19149 T.C. No. 3(2017).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions