United States: Delaware Supreme Court Narrows The Stockholder Ratification Defense For Director Self-Compensation Decisions

The Delaware Supreme Court has refined Delaware law regarding shareholder ratification of director self-compensation plans for the first time in more than 60 years. In In re Investors Bancorp, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, CA No. 12327-VCS (Investors Bancorp), decided on December 13, 2017, the court ruled that when directors make discretionary equity awards to themselves under the general parameters of a stockholder approved equity incentive plan (EIP), the stockholder ratification defense is unavailable to dismiss a properly alleged suit against said directors for improperly exercising their discretion. Instead the directors will have to demonstrate that their self-interested actions were entirely fair to the company. 1

Prior to Investors Bancorp, Delaware courts recognized a stockholder ratification defense for stockholder-approved EIPs in three situations—when stockholders approve the specific director awards, when the plan was self-executing, or when directors exercised discretion and determined the amounts and terms of the awards after stockholder approval. While the defense remains available in the first two situations post-Investors Bancorp, the court has severely limited the availability of the defense in the third.

Overview of Delaware Case Law on Ratification Defense for Director Compensation

The Delaware Supreme Court first recognized a ratification defense by directors when reviewing self-compensation decisions in the 1952 decision Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc., 90 A.2d 652.2 The stock option plan at issue in Kerbs was self-executing, meaning the directors had no discretion in implementing the awards once they were approved by the stockholders. The court held that the stockholder ratification cured any voidable defect in the actions of the board in that case. Therefore the awards would be judged by the more lenient business judgment rule, instead of the stricter entire fairness test. The next day, the court decided the case Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp., 90 A.2d 660, where, prior to ratification of a stock option plan, the board disclosed to the stockholders the names of the officers receiving the awards, the number of shares and the price per share.3 The stockholders approved the plan. The court held that, in this situation, stockholder ratification shifted the burden of proof to the objectors, and that the decision by the board of directors would be subject to the business judgment rule.

While Gottlieb was the last case in which the Delaware Supreme Court considered ratification of director self-compensation decisions, the Court of Chancery continued to develop this area of law. In In re 3COM Corp. Shareholders Litigation, C.A. No. 16721, 1999 WL 1009210, and Criden vs. Steinberg, C.A. No. 17082, 2000 WL 354390, the Court of Chancery recognized the ratification defense when the plans approved by the stockholders set upper limits on the amounts to be awarded, but gave directors discretion to decide the specific awards or change conditions of the awards after shareholder approval. 4

However, in Sample v. Morgan, 914 A.2d 647, the Court of Chancery refused to recognize the ratification defense when non-employee directors awarded shares to the company's employee directors under a management stock incentive plan.[[(Del. Ch. 2007)]] The plan in Sample authorized up to 200,000 shares, but had no further limits on how the shares should be awarded. The court saw the authorization of the plan as "a decision by the stockholders to give the directors broad legal authority," but said that the stockholders could still rely on the policing of equity to ensure that authority would be used properly. Finally, in Seinfeld v. Slager, C.A. No. 6462-VCG, 2012 WL 2501105 the Court of Chancery ruled that directors could retain their discretion to make awards after stockholder plan approval, but "the plan had to contain meaningful limits on the awards the directors could make to themselves before ratification could be successfully asserted." 5

Background

Following the completion of a second-step mutual-to-stock conversion in 2014, the directors of Investors Bancorp, Inc. (Company) submitted an EIP for approval by the stockholders. The EIP reserved 30,881,296 common shares for different types of awards for the Company's 1,800 officers, employees, non-employee directors and service providers. The EIP set limits on the number of shares that could be awarded in each category, and further broke down the limits for employee and non-employee directors. In the proxy sent to stockholders, the Company stated that the "number, types and terms of awards to be made pursuant to the [EIP] are subject to the discretion of the Committee...and will not be determined until subsequent to stockholder approval." The EIP was approved by 96.25% of the voting shares at the 2015 annual meeting.

Following approval of the EIP, the Compensation and Benefits Committee (Committee) began meeting with a compensation consultant and outside counsel to begin to determine the allocation of shares. In these meetings, the Committee considered the awards granted by other companies that underwent mutual-to-stock conversions in the last 20 years. After four meetings, the entire board approved equity awards to each of the directors, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer. As the Investors Bancorp second step conversion involved one of the largest common stock offerings in US history for such a transaction, the awards granted significantly exceeded the average for awards granted to directors of converting thrift institutions.

After the awards were disclosed, stockholders filed three separate suits, later consolidated in the Court of Chancery, alleging breach of fiduciary duty by the directors for awarding themselves excessive compensation. The defendants moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim and for failure to make a demand. The Court of Chancery granted both motions and dismissed the complaint because the EIP contained "meaningful, specific awards to all director beneficiaries." The court also dismissed claims directed to the executive directors because the plaintiffs failed to make a pre-suit demand on the board.

Delaware Supreme Court's Decision

In reversing the Court of Chancery, the Delaware Supreme Court disagreed with the Court of Chancery's previous decisions that permitted the ratification defense when directors retained discretion to make awards under an EIP as long as there are "meaningful limits." According to the court, "when it comes to the discretion directors exercise following stockholder approval of an equity incentive plan, ratification cannot be used to foreclose the Court of Chancery from reviewing those further discretionary actions when a breach of fiduciary duty claim has been properly alleged."

According to the court, stockholders have granted directors the legal authority to make the awards, but exercise of that authority by directors must be done consistent with their fiduciary duties. Finally, the court held that "when a stockholder properly alleges that the directors breached their fiduciary duties when exercising their discretion after stockholders approve the general parameters of an [EIP], the directors should have to demonstrate that their self-interested actions were entirely fair to the company."

The court also reversed the Court of Chancery's dismissal for failure to make a pre-suit demand, stating that demand was futile because "it is implausible to us that the non-employee directors could independently consider a demand when to do so would require those directors to call into questions the grants they made to themselves."

Takeaways

What is the status of the stockholder ratification defense post-Investors Bancorp?

The stockholder ratification defense remains available in cases where the stockholders approved the specific director awards or when the plan is self-executing. In these situations, the awards will be judged under the more lenient business judgment rule. However, when directors exercise discretion and determine the amounts and terms of awards following stockholder approval, the ratification defense will no longer be available and the directors will be required to show that the awards were entirely fair to the Company.

What should companies do?

The Investors Bancorp case is a clear invitation to plaintiff's class action attorneys to pursue lawsuits against public companies that have adopted director equity plans providing for future discretionary grants. Compensation Committees of such companies should consult with counsel as to whether to continue such plans or replace them with self-executing or "formula plans", where the amounts and terms of the future grants are fixed or are the subject of a clear formula. For companies that wish to retain discretionary grant plans, compensation committees should re-evaluate with counsel their procedures for determining future grants. Such evaluation may benefit from the use of independent counsel to help defend a challenge under the new standards set forth in Investors Bancorp.

*Tyler Fink contributed to this Advisory. Mr. Fink is a graduate of Washington University School of Law and is employed at Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP's New York office. Mr. Fink is not admitted to the practice of law in New York.

Footnotes

1 (Del. 2017)

2 (Del. 1952)

3 (Del. 1952)

4 (Del. Ch. Oct. 25, 1999); (Del. Ch. Mar. 32, 2000)

5 (Del. Ch. June 29, 2012)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Shearman & Sterling LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Shearman & Sterling LLP
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions